· Public charity
Teach for America Inc
Children growing up in historically marginalized and disenfranchised communities lack access to a broad spectrum of resources and opportunities, and attend schools that are not equipped to meet their needs.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 8 grants below total $3,630,292 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $35,013,608 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $31,383,316 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k1 grant · $9k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $71k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
- $250k+2 grants · $3.5M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Center For the Future of Learning | $2,000,000 |
| Leadership For Educational Equity Foundation | $1,500,000 |
| Teach Plus Incorporated | $50,000 |
| The Linocut LLC | $29,000 |
| Socol Moran Partners LLC | $22,292 |
| Urban Ed Academy Inc | $10,000 |
| Eye Thrive | $10,000 |
| Nashville Public Education Foundation | $9,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $36.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +21% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
6 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 42% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.1M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- LFLEE FOUNDATION FOR CIVIC LEADERSHIP INC9× · 2017–2025 · $36M · revenue -5% · 67% of their budget
- BOBOARD OF REGENTS NEVADA SYSTEM OF HIGHER EDUCATION2× · 2019–2023 · $3.0M
- CACITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO FINANCE CORPORATION2× · 2020–2021 · $189k
Funded once
- PEPlaylab Education Incone grant, 2024 · $735k
- DEDAKM Enterprises Incone grant, 2024 · $300k
- PUPHOENIX UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICTone grant, 2019 · $125k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To create and inspire better ways to give every student an educational foundation for lifelong success. we imagine a world where every student attends a school that meets them where they are, adapts to the unique ways they learn, and…
See Schedule ODeans for Impact supports educator-preparation programs to bring the science of learning into teaching practice; partners with policymakers to ensure pathways into teaching are accessible, practice-based, and…
The Center is dedicated to providing tools the nation needs to lead the world in education & training in a swiftly globalizing world economy.
Leading educators partners with school systems to build and sustain the conditions, teaching, and leadership to ensure that the students furthest from opportunity succeed in school and in life.
New teacher center (ntc) is a national nonprofit organization dedicated to improving outcomes for all students by accelerating teacher and school leader effectiveness. from preschool through high school, (continued on schedule o)
The chicago public education fund (the fund) is a nonprofit organization that improves public schools in chicago by investing in the talented educators who lead them.
ILearn Collaborative creates equity in education by building the capacity of educators to implement student-centered learning. We provide professional development, consulting services and a wide variety of digital resources, and we welcome…
Building educator excellence to give all students the opportunity for success.
Throughline learning partners with communities to imagine and create more equitable, relevant, and effective schools. using research, we convene, coach, and build capacity to improve outcomes and experiences for all students.
Blue engine optimizes how educators work together to create engaging, individualized learning experiences for students.
We are a nonprofit organization that specializes in codesign research between education technology companies and schools. we match parents, learners and educators with edtech developers to inform, develop, and evaluate the next generation…
Harnessing leadership as a lever for change, we partner with education leaders through professional learning and coaching to transform schools and accelerate learning for all students.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Transcend Inc and the most unlike its peers is Knowledgeworks Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds LEE FOUNDATION FOR CIVIC LEADERSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds Center for the Future of Learning ↗
- Who funds Playlab Education Inc ↗
- Who funds SCHOOL LEADER LAB ↗
- Who funds DELAWARE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds TEACH PLUS INC ↗
- Who funds ACHIEVE MIAMI INC ↗
- Who funds EDUCATORS FOR EXCELLENCE INC ↗
- Who funds DONORSCHOOSEORG ↗
- Who funds TRANSCEND INC ↗
- Who funds NASHVILLE PUBLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FUND FOR EDUCATIONAL EXCELLENCE INC ↗
- Who funds NEW SONG COMMUNITY LEARNING CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Knowledgeworks Foundation ↗
- Who funds EYE THRIVE ↗
- Who funds Urban Ed Academy ↗
- Who funds NEVADA GRANTLAB ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Walton Family Foundation Inc · Gates Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Share Our Strength · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Teach for America Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Delaware Community Foundation Inc — 13% of income from government
- Fund for Educational Excellence Inc — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.