· Private foundation
Tds Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k15 grants · $76k
- $10k–50k28 grants · $454k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $220k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SAMARITAN'S PURSE - THE GREATEST JOURNEY | $70,000 |
| OPEN EYES | $50,000 |
| RON HUTCHCRAFT MINISTRIES | $50,000 |
| THE JESUS FILM PROJECT | $50,000 |
| FAITH COMES BY HEARING | $30,000 |
| HARVEST CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP | $25,000 |
| ENDURING WORD | $25,000 |
| YOUTH FOR CHRIST USA | $25,000 |
| RIDING HIGH MINISTRIES | $25,000 |
| PULSE | $25,000 |
| PRISON FELLOWSHIP INTERNATIONAL | $25,000 |
| THE TIMOTHY INITIATIVE | $20,000 |
| CITY TO CITY LOS ANGELES | $20,000 |
| MISSION ONE ELEVEN | $16,000 |
| NOVO MISSIONS INC | $15,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–24, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 60% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +27% since the first grant, against +10% for the ones you funded once.
25 repeat relationships — 20 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 27 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 49% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $383k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SPSAMARITAN'S PURSE3× · 2021–2024 · $82k · revenue +83%
- RHRIDING HIGH MINISTRIES INC3× · 2022–2024 · $75k · revenue +113%
- EWEnduring Word3× · 2021–2024 · $75k · revenue +72%
Funded once
- OEOPEN EYES INCone grant, 2023 · $50k
- NFNOAHS FARM INCone grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue -26%
- CHCHILDREN'S HUNGER FUNDone grant, 2023 · $24k · revenue +4%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…
To spread the gospel of jesus christ through crusades
Spread the gospel of jesus christ
The organization is dedicated to reaching people for christ through an international network of christians who journey with the poor and marginalized, bringing practical and spiritual support with hope of a better future,(continued on…
This media outreach tool affords preachers and teachers of the Word in Christs Kingdom the global projection of media gospel. Our vision of Propagate Media Incorporation is to lift Jesus Christ higher for the world to see! But I, when I am…
Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.
Proclaim the gospel worldwide, prepare followers of jesus christ, and propel those into their god given destiny.
Religious
Spread the Christianity
Supporing missionaries worldwide
Global City Mission Initiative is dedicated to cross-cultural evanglism, disciplemaking, church planting among diverse diaspora populations in strategic cities reaching out evangelistically to start multiply churches, training believers to…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Child Evangelism Fellowship Inc and the most unlike its peers is TEN9 Ministries. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 19 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 16% of your grantees by number, and just 13% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
45 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 45 of the 80 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HUTCHCRAFT MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds WITH OPEN EYES FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
- Who funds RIDING HIGH MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds Enduring Word ↗
- Who funds THE TIMOTHY INITIATIVE INC ↗
- Who funds GLOBAL MEDIA OUTREACH ↗
- Who funds PRISON FELLOWSHIP INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds YOUTH FOR CHRISTUSA INC ↗
- Who funds CITY TO CITY SOCAL ↗
- Who funds REVELATION MEDIA INC ↗
- Who funds Mission One Eleven ↗
- Who funds KIDS AROUND THE WORLD INC ↗
- Who funds NOAHS FARM INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HUNGER FUND ↗
- Who funds Word for Word Ministries Inc ↗
- Who funds CHAMPION MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds GOODWORD PARTNERSHIP ↗
- Who funds Favor International Inc ↗
- Who funds CHILD EVANGELISM FELLOWSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds THE MAILBOX CLUB INC ↗
- Who funds PURE FREEDOM INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Servant Foundation · The Signatry Charitable Trust · Christian Community Foundation Inc · Chattanooga Christian Community Foundation · The Bolick Foundation · International Generosity Foundation Trust · The Maclellan Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Christian Community Foundation of Memphis · In His Steps Foundation · Thrivent Charitable Impact & Investing · The US Charitable Gift Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Tds Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Tds Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Tds Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.