Skip to content
Td Jakes Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Td Jakes Foundation

The primary mission of the foundation is to connect underrepresented and underserved communities to life changing opportunities.

$8.4M
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$1.5M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Housing & Shelter$3.0MCommunity Improvement$1.8MHealth$1.5MEmployment$750kHuman Services$657kFood & Nutrition$500kSocial Science$500kArts & Culture$210kOther$0
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 10 grants below total $7,700,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $8,353,396 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $653,396 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$500,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$4.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PAUL QUINN UNIVERSITY$1,500,000
WILEY UNIVERSITY$1,500,000
MOREHOUSE COLLEGE$1,500,000
KINGDOM GLOBAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION$500,000
LIGHTSHIP FOUNDATION$500,000
BONTON FARMS$500,000
POWER 52 FOUNDATION$500,000
JOINT CENTER FOR POLITICAL AND ECONOMIC STUDIES$500,000
OPERATION HOPE$450,000
THE MILKEN INSTITUTE$250,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $1.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 11% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%POWER 52 FOUNDATION: $500k → 6%KINGDOM GLOBAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $500k → 8%Community Council of Greater Dallas: $122k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
2
Dunwoody College of Technology

Dunwoody college changes lives by building opportunities for graduates to have successful careers, to develop into leaders and entrepreneurs, and to engage in "the better performance of life's duties." quote is from the last will and…

Education
3
Dallas Black Chamber of Commerce

To serve as an advocate for the creation, growth, and general welfare of African-Americanbusinesses in the greate Dallas area. The Chamber focuses on economic and businessdevelopment, education, and special projects.

—
4
Women's Business Enterprise National Council

Wbenc's mission is to fuel economic growth globally by identifying, certifying, and facilitating the development of women-owned businesses.

Civil Rights
5
Wallin Education Partners

To ensure college and career success for high-potential students from low-income backgrounds, and through our efforts help build diverse, equitable, and vibrant communities. we do this through a comprehensive model of financial aid and…

Education
6
The University of TexasTexas a&M Investment Management Company

To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…

Education
7
Progress Texas Institute

The Progress Texas Institute provides research and strategic communications on issues with the ultimate goal of increasing civic engagement.

Civil Rights
8
Coop Careers Inc

Building a movement of diverse, upwardly mobile college grads overcoming underemployment through digital skills and peer connections.

Education
9
Criswell College

The mission of criswell college is to provide ministerial and professional higher education for men and women preparing to serve as christian leaders throughout society, while maintaining an institutional commitment to biblical inerrancy.

Education
10
The Management Center

We help leaders working for social change build and run more equitable, sustainable, and results-driven organizations.

Education
11
Goodwill Industries of Dallas Inc

Goodwill Industries of Dallas, Inc. is a not-for-profit organization with a mission to help people with barriers to employment build skills, find jobs and reach their goals in life so that they can reach their full potential and experience…

Employment
12
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies Inc; the most unlike its peers is Wiley College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
4/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Wiley College: $1,500,000 · EducationWiley CollegeMOREHOUSE COLLEGE: $1,500,000 · EducationMOREHOUSE COLLEGEPaul Quinn College: $1,500,000 · EducationPaul Quinn CollegeBONTON ENTERPRISES: $500,000 · EducationBONTON ENTERPRISES+1 more: $35,244 · EducationTHE POTTERS HOUSE OF DALLAS INC: $800,000 · OtherTHE POTTERS HOUSE O…OPERATION HOPE INC: $450,000 · OtherOPERATION HOPE INCTHE MILKEN INSTITUTE: $250,000 · OtherTHE MILKEN INSTITUT…+1 more: $22,000 · OtherPOWER52 INC: $500,000 · Human ServicesPOWER52 INCKingdom Global Community Development Corporation: $500,000 · Human ServicesKingdom Global…COMMUNITY COUNCIL OF GREATER DALLAS: $122,076 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY COUN…Hillman Accelerator: $500,000 · Community ImprovementDALLAS MOMENTUM INC: $40,000 · Community ImprovementJOINT CENTER FOR POLITICAL AND ECONOMIC STUDIES INC: $500,000 · Social ScienceBroadway Dallas Inc: $200,000 · Arts & CultureDallas Holocaust and Human Rights Museum: $10,000 · Arts & CultureGIRL SCOUTS OF NORTHEAST TEXAS: $60,000 · Youth DevelopmentCONSCIOUS CAPITALISM INC: $20,000 · International
Education$5,035,244Other$1,522,000Human Services$1,122,076Community Improvement$540,000Social Science$500,000Arts & Culture$210,000Youth Development$60,000International$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWiley College: $1,500,000 over 1y, 9.4% of budgetMOREHOUSE COLLEGE: $1,500,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetPaul Quinn College: $1,500,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetHillman Accelerator: $500,000 over 1y, 37% of budgetPOWER52 INC: $500,000 over 1y, 49% of budgetKingdom Global Community Development Corporation: $500,000 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetBONTON ENTERPRISES: $500,000 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetJOINT CENTER FOR POLITICAL AND ECONOMIC STUDIES INC: $500,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetOPERATION HOPE INC: $450,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTHE MILKEN INSTITUTE: $250,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBroadway Dallas Inc: $200,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCOMMUNITY COUNCIL OF GREATER DALLAS: $122,076 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF NORTHEAST TEXAS: $60,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetDALLAS MOMENTUM INC: $40,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetWILKINSON CENTER: $35,244 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetTexas Women's Foundation: $22,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCONSCIOUS CAPITALISM INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetDallas Holocaust and Human Rights Museum: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Communities Foundatio…The Dallas FoundationCelanese FoundationJpmorgan Chase Founda…The Graham and Caroly…Texas Instruments Fou…The Blackbaud Giving …Charities Aid Foundat…National Philanthropi…American Online Givin…The Bank of America C…Vanguard Charitable E…
Communities Foundation of Texas IncTX15.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · The Dallas Foundation · Celanese Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Graham and Carolyn Holloway Family Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Td Jakes Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Td Jakes Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 100%
  • POWER52 Inc: 100% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Td Jakes’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home