Skip to content

· Private foundation

Taylor Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$391k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$603kArts & Culture$279kInternational$28kRecreation & Sports$14kReligion$8kEnvironment$6kHealth$6kHousing & Shelter$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $35k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $85k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$2,500
Median grant
8
States reached
$278k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VERO BEACH MUSEUM OF ART$250,000
CONNECTICUT COLLEGE$85,000
WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY$25,000
MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECH$10,000
Individual grant recipient$8,000
UNIVERSITY OF PENNYSLVANIA$4,500
ST LAWRENCE UNIVERSITY$2,500
BATES COLLEGE$2,000
YALE UNIVERSITY$1,000
FUQUA SCHOOL OF BUSINESS$1,000
FRIENDS OF LEXINGTON BIKEWAYS$500
LEXINGTON OBSERVER$500
FRIENDS OF CARY MEMORIAL LIBRARY$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%HOPE FOR FAMILIES CENTER INC: $5k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
NY
MA
PA
CT
CA
VA
NC
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 31% of Taylor Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Taylor Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$940k · 30 repeat orgs$19k to everyone else

30 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
4

Total granted

$940k
$17k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+205%

Still filing today

63%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureInternationalRecreation & SportsHealthEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WU
    WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY
    8× · 2017–2025 · $285k · revenue +40%
  • VB
    VERO BEACH MUSEUM OF ART INC
    2× · 2020–2025 · $275k · revenue +917%
  • CC
    CONNECTICUT COLLEGE
    8× · 2017–2025 · $225k · revenue +23%

Funded once

  • TH
    THE HOPE FOR FAMILIES CENTER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +205%
  • TL
    THE LEARNING ALLIANCE INC
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +10%
  • CM
    CROSSOVER MISSION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +433%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
2
Dickinson College

Dickinson college provides a useful, innovative and interdisciplinary education in the liberal arts and sciences to prepare students to lead rich and fulfilling lives of engaged global citizenship

Education
3
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
4
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
5
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
6
Washington and Lee University

Mission statement of washington and lee university: washington and lee university provides a liberal arts education that develops students' capacity to think freely, critically, and humanely and to conduct themselves with honor, integrity,…

Education
7
Sarah Lawrence College

At sarah lawrence college, our mission is to graduate citizens of the world who are diverse in every definition of the word, who take intellectual and creative risks, and who are able to focus exceptional intellectual discipline (continued…

Education
8
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
9
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
10
Wheaton College

Wheaton college provides a transformative liberal arts education, combining theory and practice, for intellectually curious students within a collaborative and vibrant extended community and network that values and strives to create an…

Education
11
Yale University

To improve the world through research, scholarship, education, preservation, and practice.

Education
12
Wellesley College

To provide an excellent liberal arts education for women who will make a difference in the world.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rye Country Day School; the most unlike its peers is The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/26
Grantees still filing
23/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $285,000 · EducationWESLEYAN UNIVERSITYCONNECTICUT COLLEGE: $225,000 · EducationCONNECTICUT COLLEGE+8 more: $43,500 · Education+8 moreVERO BEACH MUSEUM OF ART INC: $275,000 · Arts & CultureVERO BEACH MUSEUM OF ART INC+2 more: $4,000 · Arts & CultureTSTEES OF UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $14,500 · OtherTSTEES OF U…Individual grant recipient: $13,000 · OtherIndividual …UNIVERSITY OF PENNYSLVANIA: $10,500 · OtherUNIVERSITY …HANCOCK CHURCH: $8,000 · OtherHANCOCK CHU…STREAKS RUNNING CLUB INC: $6,000 · OtherSTREAKS RUN…Lexington Education Foundation Inc: $6,000 · OtherLexington E…YALE UNIVERSITY: $4,500 · OtherYALE UNIVERSITY: $4,500 · OtherYALE UNIVERSITY: $3,500 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $3,500 · OtherCUP - THE CENTER FOR URBAN PEDAGOGY: $3,500 · Other+9 more: $19,000 · Other+9 moreSave The Children Federation Inc: $27,500 · InternationalFRIENDS OF LEXINGTON BIKEWAYS INC: $7,500 · Recreation & SportsTHE HOPE FOR FAMILIES CENTER INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesCROSSOVER MISSION INC: $5,000 · Youth Development
Education$553,500Arts & Culture$279,000Other$96,500International$27,500Recreation & Sports$7,500Human Services$5,000Youth Development$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $285,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetVERO BEACH MUSEUM OF ART INC: $275,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCONNECTICUT COLLEGE: $225,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $27,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMassachusetts Institute of Technology: $12,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY: $9,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF LEXINGTON BIKEWAYS INC: $7,500 over 9y, 8.6% of budgetPRESIDENT AND TRUSTEES OF BATES COLLEGE: $6,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLexington Education Foundation Inc: $6,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetTHE LEARNING ALLIANCE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCROSSOVER MISSION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetRYE COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL: $3,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $3,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $3,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $3,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF RYE NATURE CENTER: $2,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetRYE FREE READING ROOM: $2,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE RYE ARTS CENTER INC: $2,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetST LAWRENCE UNIVERSITY: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF CARY MEMORIAL LIBRARY INC: $2,000 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLEXINGTON OBSERVER INC: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds VERO BEACH MUSEUM OF ART INC ↗
  • Who funds CONNECTICUT COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
  • Who funds Massachusetts Institute of Technology ↗
  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF LEXINGTON BIKEWAYS INC ↗
  • Who funds PRESIDENT AND TRUSTEES OF BATES COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Lexington Education Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE HOPE FOR FAMILIES CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE LEARNING ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds CROSSOVER MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds RYE COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds PAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF RYE NATURE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds RYE FREE READING ROOM ↗
  • Who funds THE RYE ARTS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds ST LAWRENCE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF CARY MEMORIAL LIBRARY INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds LEXINGTON OBSERVER INC ↗
  • Who funds SANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA7.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Taylor Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Taylor Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology: 35% of income from government
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Wesleyan University: 1% of income from government
  • Sandy Hook Promise Foundation: 0% of income from government
  • Connecticut College: 0% of income from government
  • Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc: 0% of income from government
  • The Learning Alliance Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Taylor Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Taylor Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Taylor Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph