· Private foundation
Taranto Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k38 grants · $146k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $97k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $161k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| IMMOKALEE FOUNDATION CHILDCARE | $60,010 |
| NO KID HUNGRYSHARE OUR STRENGTH | $51,200 |
| HEARTSHARE ST VINCENTS SERVICES | $50,000 |
| MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION | $26,000 |
| GUADALUPE CENTER | $10,363 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SW FLORIDA | $10,325 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF NYC | $10,325 |
| DUKE UNIVERSITY | $10,000 |
| GOLDEN PAWS ASSISTANCE | $10,000 |
| EAST SIDE HOUSE | $10,000 |
| OPERATION HEALING FORCES | $10,000 |
| HABITAT FOR HUMANITY COLLIER COUNTY | $7,829 |
| NAPLES ZOO SOCIETY | $7,500 |
| FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF NEW VERNON | $5,500 |
| ST MATTHEWS HOUSE | $5,332 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $232k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 96% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +37% since the first grant, against +28% for the ones you funded once.
79 repeat relationships — 44 still active in FY2025, 35 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SVST VINCENT'S SERVICES INC9× · 2017–2025 · $178k · revenue +65%
THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH9× · 2017–2025 · $90k · revenue +384%- ESEAST SIDE HOUSE INC5× · 2020–2025 · $50k · revenue +70%
Funded once
- MHMemorial Hermann Health Systemgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +89%
- ICINNER CITY SCHOLARSHIP FUND INCone grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue -21%
- CECOALITION ENDING GENDER-BASED VIOLENCEone grant, 2022 · $3k · revenue +4%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The new york botanical garden is a museum of plants and a scientific research center devoted to the study of plants and their uses. it is the garden's mission to improve public understanding of the natural world, horticulture, and the…
Brooklyn bridge park corporation's mission, d/b/a brooklyn bridge park ("bbp") mission is to provide an exceptional public space that connects people, nature, and the waterfront, through inclusive, innovative, and sustainable management…
The governors island corporation, doing business as the trust for governors island, is the 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization created by the city of new york and charged with the planning, redevelopment and ongoing operations of 150…
Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.
Nysci's mission is to nurture generations of passionate learners, critical thinkers, and active citizens through design make play - an approach to learning and engagement that is deeply rooted in research on stem learning and guides the…
The graduate center foundation is committed to promoting and safe-guarding the success of the graduate center by raising funds and managing and investing donations for use by the graduate center. the board of trustees of the foundation…
The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."
To manage the brooklyn navy yard for the city of new york, specifically to expand job opportunities for new yorkers by fostering the development of small businesses.
Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.
See schedule oto coordinate and facilitate the economic development of the hudson yards area of manhattan. this includes construction of an extension to the no. subway line, the coordination of the design and construction of certain public…
CITY REPORT, INC. serves the people of New York through independent journalism that answers their information needs and holds the powerful to account.
To provide excellent healthcare services without regard to age, sex, race, creed, national origin or disability; to serve as an educational and research center for physicians, nurses and healthcare professionals; to provide health…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Brooklyn Bridge Park Conservancy Inc and the most unlike its peers is Schiff Natural Lands Trust Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
67 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 67 of the 104 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SHARE OUR STRENGTH ↗
- Who funds ST VINCENT'S SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH ↗
- Who funds CHILD'S PATH INC ↗
- Who funds EAST SIDE HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds THE IMMOKALEE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
- Who funds SHELTER ISLAND PUBLIC LIBRARY SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds FIGHTING CHANCE INC ↗
- Who funds ST MATTHEWS HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds NEURO CHALLENGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Naples Therapeutic Riding Center Inc ↗
- Who funds Habitat for Humanity of Collier County Inc ↗
- Who funds NAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN INC ↗
- Who funds Golden PAWS Assistance Dogs Inc ↗
- Who funds The New York Public Library Astor Lenox and Tilden Foundations ↗
- Who funds PECONIC LAND TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds BROOKLYN PUBLIC LIBRARY ↗
- Who funds Guadalupe Center Inc ↗
- Who funds PROSPECT PARK ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds Pathways Early Education Center of Immokalee Inc ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S BRAIN TUMOR FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Walter K Hoerning Endowment Fund ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Collier Community Foundation Inc · Strong Foundation of New York · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · Carol B Phelon Foundation · The League Club Inc · The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation · Brooklyn Community Foundation · The Bessemer Giving Fund · The New York Community Trust · The Offensend Family Foundation · Joseph S & Diane H Steinberg 1992 Charitable Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Taranto Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Children's Inn at Nih Inc — 10% of income from government
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
- Homeless Solutions Inc — 6% of income from government
- Naples Botanical Garden Inc — 3% of income from government
- Guadalupe Center Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.