Skip to content

· Private foundation

Tara & Jim Knicos Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$285k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$667kEducation$183kReligion$142kRecreation & Sports$110kAnimals$89kHuman Services$19kYouth Development$10kArts & Culture$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $35k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $245k
$70,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST LUKES UNIV HEALTH NETWORK$100,000
ANIMAL FOOD BANK OF THE LEHIGH VALL$75,000
BETHLEHEM AQUATIC CLUB$70,000
A CHANNEL OF PEACE$25,000
ALLENTOWN SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION INC$10,000
CHILDREN'S DEVELOPMENTAL PROGRAM$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–19, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%CENTRAL BUCKS ROTARY FOUNDATION: $3k → 6%CENTRAL BUCKS ROTARY FOUNDATION: $3k → 6%CENTRAL BUCKS ROTARY FOUNDATION: $3k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 11 repeat orgs$114k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
9

Total granted

$1.1M
$79k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+77%

Still filing today

27%
78%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesHealthArts & CultureCrime & LegalPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FO
    FOLDS OF HONOR EASTERN-PA-NJ-CHAPTER
    2× · 2022–2023 · $40k · revenue +39%
  • CO
    Circle of Seasons Charter School
    4× · 2017–2020 · $18k · revenue +111%
  • CD
    CHILDREN'S DEVELOPMENTAL PROGRAM INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $15k · revenue +8%

Funded once

  • GS
    GOOD SHEPHERD REHABILITATION NETWORK
    one grant, 2023 · $30k · revenue +2%
  • FT
    FUND TO BENEFIT CHILDREN AND YOUTH INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +77%
  • PA
    PARKLAND AQUATIC CLUB INC
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +11%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Pennsylvania State Police Camp Cadet of Lancaster County
—
2
Golf Association of Philadelphia Foundation
Recreation & Sports
3
North Central Pennsylvania Golf Association

Golf instruction & clinics for youth, handicapping services

—
4
Philadelphia Girls' Rowing Club

To provide recreational, educational & social activities for the community & to foster & encourage good health habits, good sportsmanship & civic standards through the sport of rowing.

Recreation & Sports
5
Bucks County Horse Park

The Bucks County Horse Park, Inc. part of the Bucks County Park System, is a unique facility dedicated to the preservation of natural environment for amateur equestrian pursuits. Located in Revere Pennsylvania, we provide a variety of…

Environment
6
Lower Perkiomen Perkettes

Provide girls in the community an opportunity to build teamwork and sportsmanship qualities while playing sports in a competitive atmosphere.

—
7
Pennsylvania Society of Sons of the Revolution
—
8
Racquet Club of Philadelphia

Social activities among members

—
9
Supporters of Camp Archbald

Provided scholarships and program opportunities to Girl Scouts in Northeastern Pennsylvania.

Recreation & Sports
10
Pennsylvania State Police Camp Cadet of Chester County Inc

Free 1 week overnight camp for boys and girls ages 11-13 free 1 day camp for special needs individuals of any age

—
11
Five Star Swim Club Inc

Teaching swimming and water safety to school age children in the lancaster, pa area.

Recreation & Sports
12
Girls on the Run Lehigh Valley & Pocono

An inclusive, fun, girl-empowerment program that builds resilience through creatively combining social, emotional, and physical health with movement.

Youth Development
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fund to Benefit Children and Youth Inc; the most unlike its peers is Allentown Symphony Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
9/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST LUKES UNIV HEALTH NETWORK: $620,000 · OtherST LUKES UNIV HEALTH NETWORKNORTHAMPTON COMM COLL FDTN: $120,000 · OtherNORTHAMPTON COMM COLL FDTNBETHLEHEM AQUATIC CLUB INC: $95,000 · OtherBETHLEHEM AQUATIC CLUB INCANIMAL FOOD BANK OF THE LEHIGH VALL: $87,000 · OtherANIMAL FOOD BANK OF THE LEHIGH VALLKRIPALU: $80,000 · OtherKRIPALU+8 more: $85,500 · Other+8 moreFOLDS OF HONOR EASTERN-PA-NJ-CHAPTER: $40,000 · EducationCircle of Seasons Charter School: $18,000 · EducationCHILDREN'S DEVELOPMENTAL PROGRAM INC: $15,000 · EducationTHE OAKS WOMEN'S CLUB INC: $5,000 · EducationGOOD SHEPHERD REHABILITATION NETWORK: $30,000 · HealthALLENTOWN SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION INC: $10,000 · Arts & CultureFUND TO BENEFIT CHILDREN AND YOUTH INC: $10,000 · Crime & LegalGIRLS INCORPORATED: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentCENTRAL BUCKS ROTARY FOUNDATION INC: $9,000 · Human Services
Other$1,087,500Education$78,000Health$30,000Arts & Culture$10,000Crime & Legal$10,000Youth Development$10,000Human Services$9,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFOLDS OF HONOR EASTERN-PA-NJ-CHAPTER: $40,000 over 2y, 4.0% of budgetGOOD SHEPHERD REHABILITATION NETWORK: $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCircle of Seasons Charter School: $18,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S DEVELOPMENTAL PROGRAM INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetALLENTOWN SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFUND TO BENEFIT CHILDREN AND YOUTH INC: $10,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetPARKLAND AQUATIC CLUB INC: $10,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetCENTRAL BUCKS ROTARY FOUNDATION INC: $9,000 over 3y, 3.9% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE LEGACY TRAIL INC: $5,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetTHE OAKS WOMEN'S CLUB INC: $5,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetCAMP PAPILLON ANIMAL SHELTER INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FOLDS OF HONOR EASTERN-PA-NJ-CHAPTER ↗
  • Who funds GOOD SHEPHERD REHABILITATION NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds Circle of Seasons Charter School ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S DEVELOPMENTAL PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds ALLENTOWN SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FUND TO BENEFIT CHILDREN AND YOUTH INC ↗
  • Who funds PARKLAND AQUATIC CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds GIRLS INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL BUCKS ROTARY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE LEGACY TRAIL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE OAKS WOMEN'S CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds CAMP PAPILLON ANIMAL SHELTER INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Ppl FoundationPA13.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ppl Foundation · Chubb Charitable Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Tara & Jim Knicos Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Tara & Jim Knicos Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Tara & Jim Knicos’ filings →

    More from the funding graph