Skip to content

· Private foundation

Tamaasus

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$49k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$365kEducation$73kInternational$31kEnvironment$5kFood & Nutrition$5kPublic Benefit$3kHuman Services$3kCommunity Improvement$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k18 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $26k
$1,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$43k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$15,400
Individual grant recipient$10,533
Individual grant recipient$5,190
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Individual grant recipient$2,500
Individual grant recipient$1,488
MIZNA$1,085
Individual grant recipient$1,000
UGLY DUCKLING PRESSE$1,000
THE BROOKLYN YOUTH CHOIR$1,000
Individual grant recipient$704
Individual grant recipient$700
Individual grant recipient$700
Individual grant recipient$699
THE INVISIBLE DOG FUNDRAISER KICKSTARTER$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 83% of grant dollars ($620k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 17% that went abroad ($129k) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $105) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%FROST VALLEY YMCA: $105 → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
MN
IL
WI
NY
MA
OH
CA
CO
MO
VA
AZ
GA
TX
FL

Beyond the US: 17% of all-years giving ($129k)

9 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
United Kingdom$51k · 2 grants
Morocco$49k · 5 grants
Chile$13k · 3 grants
OC$9k · 3 grants
Egypt$2k · 1 grant
France$2k · 3 grants
Germany$1k · 1 grant
India$775 · 1 grant
Canada$775 · 1 grant
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 28% of Tamaasus’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Tamaasuslessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 17% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

65%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$380k · 23 repeat orgs$204k to everyone else

23 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
67

Total granted

$380k
$184k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+41%

Still filing today

30%
18%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 58% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $21k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationAnimalsCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IS
    INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL OF BROOKLYN
    2× · 2021–2022 · $40k · revenue +20%
  • NU
    Naropa University
    4× · 2017–2021 · $13k · revenue +34%
  • TP
    THE POETRY PROJECT LTD
    5× · 2020–2024 · $6k · revenue ×32

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $58k
  • US
    UPLAND SOUND LLC
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
National Poetry Series Inc
—
2
Columbia University Press

Enhance Columbia University's education mission by acquiring and publishing outstanding original works by scholars and others that contribute to an understanding of global human concerns. Columbia University Press became part of the…

Arts & Culture
3
Ether Sea Projects Inc Dba Litmus Press

Ether Sea Projects D/B/A Litmus Press publishes innovative poetry, prose, and formally experimental writing from around the world. We champion avant-garde legacies through our stewardship of foundational feminist predecessors of small…

Arts & Culture
4
Essay Press Publishers
Arts & Culture
5
Dzanc Books Inc

Dzanc Books was hailed as the future of publishing in Publishers Weekly in December 2007. Beginning with modest goals of publishing 4-6 titles each year, the house now publishes between 10-15 books annually. Notable and award-winning…

Arts & Culture
6
A Public Space Literary Projects Inc

The organization is an independent publisher of a public space books and a literary and arts magazine that supports overlooked and unclassifiable work from beyond established confines. the organizations programs also include writing and…

Arts & Culture
7
Canopy Canopy Canopy Inc
Arts & Culture
8
Nomadic Press

Through publications, events, and active community participation, Nomadic Press collectively weaves together platforms for intentionally marginalized voices to take their rightful place within the world of the written and spoken word.…

Arts & Culture
9
Susan Smith Blackburn Prize Inc
—
10
Graywolf Press

Graywolf press publishes risk-taking, visionary writers who transform culture through literature. when writers are free to do their most ambitious work, their books serve as portals to new possibilities and enable deeper understanding…

Arts & Culture
11
Poetry Flash

Poetry flash builds community through literature

—
12
Boa Editions Ltd

To publish and foster appreciation of comtemporary literary works.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Woodland Pattern Inc; the most unlike its peers is East River Park Action Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 106 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
13/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $66,200 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $57,970 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $50,317 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $48,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientInternat Sorop Scol Fille Rurale: $46,200 · OtherInternat Sorop Scol Fille RuraleSOROPTOMIST CLUB MARRAKECH: $30,800 · OtherSOROPTOMIST CLUB MARRAKECHUPLAND SOUND LLC: $25,000 · Other+83 more: $196,211 · Other+83 moreINTERNATIONAL SCHOOL OF BROOKLYN: $40,000 · EducationINTERNATION…PRATT INSTITUTE: $15,000 · EducationPRATT INSTI…THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $2,505 · Education+2 more: $3,000 · EducationBROOKLYN ARTS EXCHANGE INC: $1,250 · Arts & CultureUGLY DUCKLING PRESSE LTD: $1,250 · Arts & CultureBELLADONNA SERIES INC: $1,000 · Arts & CultureFUTUREPOEM INC: $500 · Arts & CultureWOMEN MAKE MOVIES INC: $350 · Arts & CultureWORLD POETRY BOOKS: $208 · Arts & Culture+2 more: $90 · Arts & CultureEast River Park Action Inc: $1,000 · Community ImprovementFROST VALLEY YMCA: $105 · Human ServicesSAVE THE MANATEE CLUB INC: $100 · Animals
Other$520,698Education$60,505Arts & Culture$4,648Community Improvement$1,000Human Services$105Animals$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetINTERNATIONAL SCHOOL OF BROOKLYN: $40,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPRATT INSTITUTE: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNaropa University: $12,950 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE POETRY PROJECT LTD: $6,148 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $2,505 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOFFEE HOUSE PRESS INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBROOKLYN ARTS EXCHANGE INC: $1,250 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUGLY DUCKLING PRESSE LTD: $1,250 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY CORPORATION SAN FRANCISCO STATE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEast River Park Action Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetBELLADONNA SERIES INC: $1,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetFUTUREPOEM INC: $500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetARTISTS IN RESIDENCE INC: $300 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD POETRY BOOKS: $208 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSAVE THE MANATEE CLUB INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SEGUE FOUNDATION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOODLAND PATTERN INC: $40 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL OF BROOKLYN ↗
  • Who funds PRATT INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds Naropa University ↗
  • Who funds THE POETRY PROJECT LTD ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND ↗
  • Who funds COFFEE HOUSE PRESS INC ↗
  • Who funds BROOKLYN ARTS EXCHANGE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Poetry FoundationIL17.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Poetry Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Tamaasus funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Tamaasus. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Tamaasus?

    Find your warmest path to Tamaasus through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 106 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Tamaasus’ filings →

    More from the funding graph