Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Tagliabue Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$162k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192025.

Philanthropy$393kHuman Services$210kScience & Tech$125kEnvironment$100kHealth$50kHousing & Shelter$42kPublic Benefit$20kAnimals$16kOther$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $142k
$66,667
Median grant
1
States reached
$4.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BIGELOW LABORATORY FOR OCEAN SCIENCES$75,000
BOOTHBAY REGION YMCA$66,667
REBUILDING TOGETHER - LINCOLN COUNTY$10,000
BOOTHBAY REGION COMMUNITY RESOURCE COUNCIL$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–22, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 28%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%DESTINATION TOMORROW: $3k → 28%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$410k · 5 repeat orgs$174k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +33% since the first grant, against +5% for the ones you funded once.

5 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
8

Total granted

$410k
$174k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+5%

Still filing today

100%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’22’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’22’24’25
EnvironmentHousing & ShelterPublic BenefitScience & TechEducationHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YM
    Young Men's Christian Association Boothbay Region
    4× · 2019–2025 · $200k · revenue +33%
  • RT
    REBUILDING TOGETHER-LINCOLN COUNTY
    4× · 2019–2025 · $42k · revenue +81%
  • BR
    BOOTHBAY REGION COMMUNITY RESOURCE COUNCIL
    3× · 2019–2025 · $28k · revenue +36%

Funded once

  • BH
    Boothbay Harbor Waterfront Preservation
    one grant, 2019 · $80k · revenue -71%
  • M
    MAINEHEALTH
    one grant, 2022 · $50k
  • CR
    COMMUNITY RESOURCE COUNCIL
    one grant, 2022 · $16k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wetlands Foundation
Environment
2
Islesboro Islands Trust

The mission of Islesboro Islands Trust is to enhance the quality of residents' lives through the preservation of open space, educate all residents as to the value of the island's natural ecosystems, and act as an environmental advocate on…

Philanthropy
3
Boothbay Region Land Trust

To conserve for the public benefit natural habitat, scenic beauty, and working land of the Boothbay region of Maine by providing stewardship, public access, and environmental programs.

Environment
4
Boothbay Region Maritime Foundation

Preserving our Maritime Heritage by supporting working waterfront, promoting sustainable practices, and embracing the educational opportunities this stewardship provides.

Environment
5
Protect Maine's Fishing Heritage Foundation
Environment
6
Maine Island Trail Association

The mission of the Maine Island Trail Association is to advance a model of thoughtful use and volunteer stewardship of Maine's wild islands, creating an inspiring recreational water trail that is cared for by the people who use it.

Environment
7
Frenchman Bay Conservancy

Frenchman Bay Conservancy protects and cares for our local lands and waters for the benefit of communities and nature.

Environment
8
Kennebunk Land Trust

Kennebunk Land Trust's mission is to permanently conserve and steward land to benefit natural and human communities.

Environment
9
Sebasticook Regional Land Trust

The mission of the SRLT is to recognize and conserve the rich wild and workinglandscape of Central Maine's Sebasticook River watershed through conservation,stewardship and education. Our focal programs are land conservation for…

Environment
10
Maine Donor Alliance Fund

To build a permanent and powerful progressive movement in Maine. We will promote a healthy, just, equitable democracy through research, engagement, and education of Maine's citizens. We will engage in democracy expansion, voter engagement,…

Education
11
Maine Maritime Museum

To connect people to the past, present, and future of Maine's waterways and their global reach.

Arts & Culture
12
Somerset Woods Trustees

To conserve lands with significant ecological or cultural resources and manage them in a sustainable way for public benefit.

Environment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Mid Coast Maine Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Sterling Donor Advised Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
7/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE STERLING DONOR ADVISED FUND — $385,000 · PhilanthropyTHE STERLING DONOR ADVISED FUNDYoung Men's Christian Association Boothbay Region — $199,667 · OtherYoung Men's Christian Association…MAINEHEALTH — $50,000 · OtherMAINEHEALTHCOMMUNITY RESOURCE COUNCIL — $16,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY RESOURCE COUNCILFREEPORT HIGH SCHOOL SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION — $10,000 · Other+3 more — $13,000 · OtherBigelow Laboratory for Ocean Sciences — $125,000 · Science & TechBigelow Labora…Boothbay Harbor Waterfront Preservation — $80,000 · EnvironmentBoothbay Ha…Squirrel Island Preservation Foundation — $15,235 · EnvironmentSquirrel Is…REBUILDING TOGETHER-LINCOLN COUNTY — $42,000 · Housing & ShelterBOOTHBAY REGION COMMUNITY RESOURCE COUNCIL — $28,000 · Public BenefitIsland Institute — $5,000 · Education
Philanthropy$385,000Other$288,667Science & Tech$125,000Environment$95,235Housing & Shelter$42,000Public Benefit$28,000Education$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE STERLING DONOR ADVISED FUND — $385,000 over 4y, 2.7% of budgetYoung Men's Christian Association Boothbay Region — $199,667 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetBigelow Laboratory for Ocean Sciences — $125,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetREBUILDING TOGETHER-LINCOLN COUNTY — $42,000 over 4y, 14% of budgetBOOTHBAY REGION COMMUNITY RESOURCE COUNCIL — $28,000 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetSquirrel Island Preservation Foundation — $15,235 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetFREEPORT HIGH SCHOOL SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetUNITED WAY OF MID COAST MAINE INC — $8,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetIsland Institute — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDESTINATION TOMORROW INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNEW IMMIGRANT COMMUNITY EMPOWERMENT INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Sterling Donor Advised FundVA20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Sterling Donor Advised Fund · Maine Community Foundation Inc · Palmer Walbridge Foundation · Mildred H McEvoy Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Tagliabue Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph