Skip to content
Tabitha M Devisconti Residual Trust at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Tabitha M Devisconti Residual Trust

Funding charitable organizations

$3k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Education$70kPublic Safety & Disaster$38kReligion$29kYouth Development$28kHealth$24kArts & Culture$20kPhilanthropy$20kHuman Services$18kOther$0
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EAST CAROLINA COUNCIL BSA$1,000
TOWN OF FARMVILLE$500
BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICAEAST CAROLINA$500
GIRL SCOUTS OF AMERICA$500
PITT COUNTY SCHOOLS FCHS$200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–23, $18k) land where the poverty rate runs at 21%, against an area that typically sits at 19%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 19%BOYS AND GIRLS HOME OF NC: $10k → 21%BOYS & GIRLS HOMES OF NC INC: $8k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$182k · 8 repeat orgs$80k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
8

Total granted

$182k
$79k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+7%
+64%

Still filing today

38%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $200 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesReligionCommunity ImprovementYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TO
    Town of Farmville
    4× · 2020–2024 · $80k
  • AR
    AMERICAN RED CROSS PITT CO CHAPTER
    2× · 2020–2023 · $18k
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS HOMES OF NC INC
    2× · 2020–2023 · $18k · revenue +7%

Funded once

  • HS
    HB SUGG CHARITABLE ORGANIZATION
    one grant, 2020 · $20k
  • FC
    FARMVILLE COMMUNITY ARTS COUNCIL INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $20k · revenue +536% · 71% of their budget
  • FR
    Farmville Rescue & Emergency Medical Services Inc
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +15%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Farmington Country Club

The club promotes social interaction and recreation for the benefit of its members.

—
2
Boys & Girls Clubs of Southeastern Nc Foundation Inc
—
3
Faith and Freedom Coalition of South Carolina Inc
—
4
Girl Scout Council of Colonial Coast

Girl scout council of colonial coast, a united way agency, serves girls in grades k-12, in southeastern virginia and northeastern north carolina. our mission is to build girls of courage, confidence and character, who make the world a…

Youth Development
5
Boys and Girls Club of Kingsville Inc

Program serves to develop boys and girls in kingsville.

—
6
Boys and Girls Club of Frederick Co

The mission of boys & girls club of frederick county is to enable all youth, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as responsible, productive, caring citizens.

Youth Development
7
The Boys and Girls Club of Fauquier Inc

Helping young people with special concern for those from disadvantaged circumstances, develop the qualities needed to become responsible citizens

—
8
Boys and Girls Clubs of N Cent Nc

To inspire and enable all young people, especially those who need it most, to realize their full potential and to be productive, responsible, and caring citizens.

Youth Development
9
The Boys & Girls Clubs of Metro South Inc

To nurture strong minds, healthy bodies and community spirit through youth driven, quality programming in a safe and fun environment.

—
10
Cape Fear Council Boy Scouts of America

Promote ability of boys, young men & women to do things for themselves & others, training them in scoutcraft & teaching them patriotism, courage, self-reliance & to prepare them to make ethical in their lives.

—
11
Family Research Council

The family research council's primary exempt purpose is to reaffirm and promote nationally, and particularly in washington, dc, the traditional family unit and the judeo-christian value system upon which it is built. frc's activities in…

Human Services
12
The Family Y Young Men's Christian Association/Ywco of the Csra Inc

Our mission is to serve individuals and families in the csra through programs designed to build healthy spirit, mind, and body, reflecting the values of the judeo-christian tradition while maintaining respect for all people.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boys and Girls Clubs of the Coastal Plain; the most unlike its peers is Son Set Ministries Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Town of Farmville: $80,432 · OtherTown of FarmvilleHB SUGG CHARITABLE ORGANIZATION: $20,000 · OtherHB SUGG CHARITABLE ORGANIZATIONFARMVILLE COMMUNITY ARTS COUNCIL INC: $20,000 · OtherFARMVILLE COMMUNITY ARTS COUNCIL INCAMERICAN RED CROSS PITT CO CHAPTER: $17,916 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSS PITT CO CHAPTERAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY HOPE LODGE: $17,916 · OtherAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY HOPE LODGEFARMVILLE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $16,332 · OtherFARMVILLE UNITED METHODIST CHURCHGIRL SCOUTS: $13,640 · OtherGIRL SCOUTSBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF THE COASTAL PLAIN: $10,000 · Other+3 more: $8,006 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS HOMES OF NC INC: $17,916 · Human ServicesSON SET MINISTRIES INC: $13,000 · ReligionFarmville Rescue & Emergency Medical Services Inc: $10,000 · HealthNorth Carolina Stop Human Trafficking Inc: $3,000 · HealthFARMVILLE DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIP INC: $10,000 · Community ImprovementFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $3,000 · Youth Development
Other$204,242Human Services$17,916Religion$13,000Health$13,000Community Improvement$10,000Youth Development$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFARMVILLE COMMUNITY ARTS COUNCIL INC: $20,000 over 1y, 71% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS HOMES OF NC INC: $17,916 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSON SET MINISTRIES INC: $13,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetEAST CAROLINA COUNCIL BSA: $4,501 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNorth Carolina Stop Human Trafficking Inc: $3,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Eddie and Jo Allison …James J & Mamie Richa…University Health Sys…Foundation for the Ca…Natl Christian Charit…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Eddie and Jo Allison Smith Family Foundation IncNC15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Eddie and Jo Allison Smith Family Foundation Inc · James J & Mamie Richardson Perkins Memorial Fund - C/O Bank of America · University Health Systems of Eastern Carolina Foundation Inc · Foundation for the Carolinas · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Tabitha M Devisconti Residual Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Tabitha M Devisconti Residual Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Tabitha M Devisconti Residual Trust?

    Find your warmest path to Tabitha M Devisconti Residual Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Tabitha M Devisconti Residual’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home