Skip to content

· Private foundation

Tabachnick Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$18k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$52kCivil Rights$46kHuman Services$32kInternational$25kEducation$23kSocial Science$16kArts & Culture$14kPublic Benefit$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
4
States reached
$18k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$7,500
VOICES FOR PROGRESS EDUCATION FUND$2,500
J STREET EDUCATION FUND$1,800
MCGILL UNIVERSITY$1,354
CONGREGATION BETH YAM$915
PITTSBURGH YOUTH SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA$750
THE AMERICAN PROSPECT$650
CONGRESSIONAL PROGRESSIVE CAUCUS CE$500
ACLU OF PENNSYLVANIA$500
WESTMORELAND FOOD BANK$475
KEYSTONE PROGRESS EDUCATION FUND$400
LIGONIER VOLUNTEER HOSE COMPANY$300
FALLING WATER$250
PEOPLE FOR THE AMERICAN WAY$150
MANNA FOOD BANK$150
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $32k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%VOICES FOR PROGRESS EDUCATION FUND: $9k → 14%VOICES FOR PROGRESS EDUCATION FUND: $4k → 14%VOICES FOR PROGRESS EDUCATION FUND: $4k → 14%VOICES FOR PROGRESS EDUCATION FUND: $4k → 14%VOICES FOR PROGRESS EDUCATION FUND: $3k → 14%VOICES FOR PROGRESS EDUCATION FUND: $3k → 14%VOICES FOR PROGRESS EDUCATION FUND: $3k → 14%VOICES FOR PROGRESS EDUCATION FUND: $3k → 14%VOICES FOR PROGRESS EDUCATION FUND: $2k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
PA
CA
CO
MD
NC
SC
DC
AL
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 15% of Tabachnick Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Tabachnick Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 27% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$181k · 30 repeat orgs$5k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +40% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

30 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
16

Total granted

$181k
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
0%

Still filing today

50%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Civil RightsSocial SciencePublic BenefitArts & CultureEnvironmentInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JS
    J STREET EDUCATION FUND INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $50k · revenue +40%
  • SP
    SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $5k · revenue +10%
  • TA
    THE AMERICAN PROSPECT INC
    3× · 2022–2025 · $2k · revenue +41%

Funded once

  • PC
    PROGRESSIVE CAUCUS CENTER
    one grant, 2021 · $1k
  • CN
    CleanAIRE NCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $500 · revenue +55%
  • IU
    INSPIRE US
    one grant, 2019 · $360
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Pro Publica Inc

Pro publica is an independent, non-profit, pulitzer prize-winning newsroom that produces investigative journalism in the public interest. our work focuses exclusively on truly important stories. [see continuation on schedule o] we produce…

Arts & Culture
2
Institute for Public Accuracy

To teach and disseminate educational materials to the public.

Arts & Culture
3
Commission On Presidential Debates

Organize general election presidential and vice-presidential debates

Civil Rights
4
The Campaign Legal Center Inc

The nonpartisan campaign legal center advances democracy through law at the federal, state and local levels, fighting for every american's rights to responsive government and a fair opportunity to participate in and affect the democratic…

Crime & Legal
5
America's Newspapers

Providing research, education and practical information all aimed at optimizing newspapers' business operations, deepening their community engagement and enhancing the quality of their journalism.

Employment
6
Pew Research Center

Pew Research Center is a nonpartisan "fact tank" that informs the public about the issues, attitudes and trends shaping America and the world. Pew Research Center generates a foundation of facts that enriches the public dialogue and…

Social Science
7
Common Future

Common future is a network of pioneering leaders across the u.s. and canada who work deeply within their communities to create alternative approaches to business, philanthropy, and investing. we envision an economy that has transitioned…

Community Improvement
8
World Privacy Forum

The world privacy forum is dedicated to reimaging privacy in a digital era through ground-breaking, in-depth privacy research and consumer education of the highest quality. our vision is to empower people with the knowledge, rights, and…

Public Benefit
9
The Center for Public Integrity

The center for public integrity inspires change using investigative reporting that reveals the causes and effects of inequality. discriminatory systems in employment, housing, health care, education and access to democracy affect people…

Public Benefit
10
National Taxpayers Union Foundation

National taxpayers union foundation (ntuf) provides crucial, impactful research and analysis showing americans how taxes, government spending, and regulations affect them. with our unique combination of policy expertise, outreach know-how,…

—
11
Liberty Justice Center

To advance economic and social liberties and a free enterprise society through strategic litigation, training, communication, activism and research. in addition, the center will train law students, lawyers and policy activists in the…

Crime & Legal
12
Center for American Progress

The center for american progress (cap) is an independent nonpartisan policy institute that is dedicated to improving the lives of all americans through bold, progressive ideas, as well as strong leadership and concerted action. our aim is…

Civil Rights
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is People for the American Way; the most unlike its peers is Greater Susquehanna Valley Ymca. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/29
Grantees still filing
17/29
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $29,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $25,100 · OtherIndividual grant recipientKEYSTONE PROGRESS ED FUND: $13,125 · OtherKEYSTONE PROGRESS ED FUNDPITTSBURGH YOUTH SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $10,515 · OtherPITTSBURGH YOUTH SYMPHONY ORCHESTRAMCGILL UNIVERSITY: $10,008 · OtherMCGILL UNIVERSITYACLU OF PENNSYLVANIA: $8,000 · OtherACLU OF PENNSYLVANIA+33 more: $15,477 · Other+33 moreJ STREET EDUCATION FUND INC: $49,580 · ReligionJ STREET EDUCATION FUND I…TIDES CENTER: $32,450 · Human ServicesTIDES CENTERKeystone Research Center Inc: $15,518 · Social ScienceECONOMIC POLICY INSTITUTE: $700 · Social Science+2 more: $250 · Social ScienceSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $5,150 · Crime & LegalTHE AMERICAN PROSPECT INC: $1,650 · Arts & CultureTYPE MEDIA CENTER INC: $600 · Arts & CultureThe Women and Girls Foundation of Southwest Pennsylvania: $500 · Civil RightsTHE VOTER PARTICIPATION CENTER: $400 · Civil RightsKEYSTONE PROGRESS EDUCATION FUND: $400 · Civil RightsMI FAMILIA EN ACCION: $250 · Civil Rights
Other$111,225Religion$49,580Human Services$32,450Social Science$16,468Crime & Legal$5,150Arts & Culture$2,250Civil Rights$1,550

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJ STREET EDUCATION FUND INC: $49,580 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetTIDES CENTER: $32,450 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetKeystone Research Center Inc: $15,518 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $5,150 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN PROSPECT INC: $1,650 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPEOPLE FOR THE AMERICAN WAY: $1,300 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetECONOMIC POLICY INSTITUTE: $700 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF WESTERN PA INC: $650 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTYPE MEDIA CENTER INC: $600 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCleanAIRE NC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Women and Girls Foundation of Southwest Pennsylvania: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE VOTER PARTICIPATION CENTER: $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCLEAN WATER ACTION: $363 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetINSPIRE US: $360 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetPUBLIC CITIZEN INC: $310 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMON CAUSE EDUCATION FUND: $260 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMI FAMILIA EN ACCION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BIRTH CENTER: $250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetInstitute for Southern Studies Inc: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR POPULAR DEMOCRACY INC: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCLEAN WATER FUND: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED PHILANTHROPY FORUM: $125 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPUBLIC CITIZEN FOUNDATION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUnited for A Fair Economy Inc: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW JEWISH NARRATIVE INC: $36 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGreater Susquehanna Valley YMCA: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds J STREET EDUCATION FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds TIDES CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Keystone Research Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN PROSPECT INC ↗
  • Who funds PEOPLE FOR THE AMERICAN WAY ↗
  • Who funds ECONOMIC POLICY INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF WESTERN PA INC ↗
  • Who funds TYPE MEDIA CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds CleanAIRE NC ↗
  • Who funds The Women and Girls Foundation of Southwest Pennsylvania ↗
  • Who funds THE VOTER PARTICIPATION CENTER ↗
  • Who funds KEYSTONE PROGRESS EDUCATION FUND ↗
  • Who funds CLEAN WATER ACTION ↗
  • Who funds INSPIRE US ↗
  • Who funds PUBLIC CITIZEN INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMON CAUSE EDUCATION FUND ↗
  • Who funds MI FAMILIA EN ACCION ↗
  • Who funds THE BIRTH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC ↗
  • Who funds Institute for Southern Studies Inc ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR POPULAR DEMOCRACY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Tides FoundationCA16.7× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Tides Foundation · New Venture Fund · The Ford Foundation · Impactassetsinc · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Proteus Fund Inc · Hopewell Fund · Annie E Casey Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Tabachnick Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Tabachnick Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Tabachnick Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Tabachnick Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 52 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Tabachnick Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph