Skip to content
T Causemetics Foundation Dba Thrive Causemetics Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

T Causemetics Foundation Dba Thrive Causemetics Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$21M
Granted FY2024still arriving
205
Grants FY2024still arriving
41
States reached
$310k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Health$25MHuman Services$21MHousing & Shelter$13MPublic Safety & Disaster$4.2MCivil Rights$3.1MCrime & Legal$1.3MEmployment$1.1MPublic Benefit$678kOther$0
02FY2024 · 205 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $7k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $159k
  • $50k–250k196 grants · $20M
  • $250k+2 grants · $560k
$88,586
Median grant
41
States reached
$13M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
POSITIVE RESULTS CENTER$309,548
ANGEL HANZ FOR THE HOMELESS INC$250,796
I SUPPORT THE GIRLS$206,978
HOOKS FOR HEROES CONNECTICUT INC$201,170
SOLDIERS' ANGELS$201,170
FIGHTING PRETTY$191,312
HAGARS HEART$181,996
RICHMOND FRIENDS OF THE HOMELESS$181,996
YWCA OF GREATER BATON ROUGE$181,996
BEAUTY 2 THE STREETZ$179,378
BRCASTRONG$170,586
PROJECT BEAUTY SHARE$162,050
SOCKS FOR THE STREETS$162,050
THE WARDROBE$162,050
COVENANT HOUSE CALIFORNIA$162,050
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $16.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 49% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%HOPE WOMEN'S CENTER: $108k → 11%ADVOCATES AGAINST FAMILY VIOLENCE: $114k → 11%BEVERLY'S BIRTHDAYS: $108k → 10%NEWS: $154k → 9%NAPA SOLANO SANE SART: $129k → 10%PROJECT GLIMMER: $108k → 10%OUT MY CLOSET INC: $108k → 13%PROJECT BEAUTY: $110k → 5%HAGARS HEART: $182k → 11%COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS: $108k → 15%WICHITA WOMENS INITIATIVE NETWORK INC: $88k → 16%BEREAVED TOGETHER: $97k → 5%SHIELD OF SISTERS: $92k → 8%PARTNERSHIP FOR GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER SUPPORT: $89k → 12%HELLO GORGEOUS OF HOPE INC: $98k → 13%THE GATHERING PLACE: $89k → 17%PROJECT BEAUTY SHARE: $162k → 12%PRECIOUS LITTLE LADIES INC: $132k → 16%FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER INC: $98k → 16%THE CUPCAKE GIRLS: $88k → 13%THE LIFE OF A SINGLE MOM: $126k → 19%I SUPPORT THE GIRLS: $2.7M → 8%PROJECT CONFIDENCE: $108k → 7%DRESS FOR SUCCESS BOSTON INC: $88k → 16%FOUNDATION FOR WOMEN WARRIORS: $88k → 11%THE CHICK MISSION: $89k → 17%FOUNDATION FOR GIRLS: $157k → 10%MAGENTA MOMZ INC: $94k → 9%Step Sisters: $1.6M → 4%Richmond Friends of the Homeless: $286k → 7%YWCA OF GREATER BATON ROUGE: $182k → 19%I SUPPORT THE GIRLS: $207k → 8%WOMEN HELPING WOMEN: $98k → 9%SINGLE PARENTS ALLIANCE & RESOURCE CENTER: $108k → 9%BREAK THE SILENCE AGAINST DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $98k → 9%STEP SISTERS: $154k → 4%RICHMOND FRIENDS OF THE HOMELESS: $182k → 7%COVENANT HOUSE CALIFORNIA: $162k → 14%GLAMOURGALS FOUNDATION INC: $88k → 17%HOUSE OF CHERITH: $132k → 13%NEW LIFE CENTER: $88k → 11%BOTTOMLESS CLOSET: $152k → 17%UTOPIA WA: $2.2M → 9%UTOPIA WASHINGTON: $162k → 9%American Red Cross: $4.2M → 14%CHILDREN'S INSTITUTE INC: $93k → 14%BEAUTY 2 THE STREETZ: $179k → 14%THE VILLAGE FAMILY SERVICES: $88k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
WA
ID
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
SD
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
KY
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 12% of T Causemetics Foundation Dba Thrive Causemetics Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

T Causemetics Foundation Dba Thrive Causemetics Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

31%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$21M · 8 repeat orgs$46M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +51% since the first grant, against +44% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 197 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
10

Total granted

$21M
$26M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%
+44%

Still filing today

75%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 7% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $19M went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthCrime & LegalEmploymentCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • For the Girls Inc
    3× · 2021–2024 · $7.4M · revenue +138% · 66% of their budget
  • SA
    SOLDIERS' ANGELS
    2× · 2023–2024 · $5.6M · revenue +56%
  • UT
    UNITED TERRITORIES OF PACIFIC ISLANDERS WASHINGTON-UTOPIA WA
    2× · 2023–2024 · $2.4M · revenue +13% · 65% of their budget

Funded once

  • I
    iGoPink
    one grant, 2020 · $10M
  • DIGNITY FOR DIVASgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $5.8M · revenue +44%
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branchesgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $4.2M · revenue +38%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Pink Is My Power Color

To meet the well-being of women who are in mental, and psychological need of support. to help women dealing with, recovering from or diagnosed with cancer who are in need of the support of other survivors. as well as helping women who…

Health
2
My Sistahs Pink Journey

Helping women with cancer

Health
3
We Lift You Up

Encourage cancer survivors to seek the support and camaraderie of other cancer survivors, so that they can find their strength, purpose and passion through our empowering, life-skill building activities.

Human Services
4
Womens Cancer Resource Center

The Womens Cancer Resource Center improves equitable access to cancer information, support and care.

Unclassified
5
Woman Inc

W.O.M.A.N., Inc. supports survivors of domestic violence and their loved ones along their healing journeys, bridging value rich networks designed to address intersections of violence. In all our work, we strive to continually increase our…

Health
6
Women Empowering Women
Unclassified
7
Pampered Pink

Supporting local women in their battle against breast cancer.

Health
8
Here for the Girls Inc

Form 990, part iii, line 1 here for the girls, inc. (h4tg) is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization dedicated to supporting women under 50 in their unique breast cancer journey. h4tg offers a variety of personalized services crafted…

Health
9
Courageous Women Association

Women Support Services

Human Services
10
Woman Survival Inc

Help abused & battered woman

Housing & Shelter
11
Beautiful Self Inc

Beautiful self inc. is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization devoted to making a difference in the lives of women afflicted with post breast cancer trauma. the grueling and long-term effects of breast cancer treatment wreak havoc on the…

—
12
Bloom for Women Inc

To provide sanctuary and a continuum of care to heal, empower, and employ survivors of sex trafficking and exploitation

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Women Helping Women; the most unlike its peers is Teamizzy Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

166 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 166 of the 215 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

37
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
165/166
Grantees still filing
53/166
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

For the Girls Inc: $7,412,206 · Human ServicesFor the Girls IncDIGNITY FOR DIVAS: $5,833,324 · Human ServicesDIGNITY FOR DIVASAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $4,178,616 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent …UNITED TERRITORIES OF PACIFIC ISLANDERS WASHINGTON-UTOPIA WA: $2,357,164 · Human ServicesUNITED TERRITORIES OF PACIFIC ISLANDERS WASHIN…THE STEP SISTERS: $1,794,208 · Human ServicesTHE STEP SISTERS+47 more: $5,484,272 · Human Services+47 moreiGoPink: $10,103,819 · OtheriGoPinkDRESS FOR SUCCESS: $3,525,840 · OtherDRESS FOR SUCCESSANGEL HANZ FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $2,243,618 · OtherANGEL HANZ FOR THE HOMELESS INCNATIONAL BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION: $1,190,480 · Other+81 more: $9,454,852 · Other+81 moreSOLDIERS' ANGELS: $5,626,794 · Public Safety & DisasterSOLDIERS'…FIGHTING PRETTY INC: $697,912 · HealthBRCA Strong Corp: $170,586 · Health+40 more: $3,784,153 · HealthPOSITIVE RESULTS CENTER: $309,548 · Crime & LegalWOMEN SPEAKING OUT: $107,890 · Crime & LegalTeleverde Foundation: $87,562 · Crime & LegalJOURNEY OF HOPE INC: $87,562 · Crime & LegalSAFECHILD: $85,540 · Crime & LegalSafeBae Org Inc: $77,872 · Crime & LegalCOALITION TO ABOLISH SLAVERY & TRAFFICKING: $74,748 · Crime & LegalIN OUR OWN VOICE NATIONAL BLACK WOMEN'S REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE AGENDA: $74,748 · Crime & LegalTHE CAREER WARDROBE: $162,050 · EmploymentDowntown Streets Inc: $144,122 · EmploymentDRESS FOR SUCCESS RIVER CITIES INC: $107,890 · EmploymentJVS SOCAL: $87,562 · EmploymentDRESS FOR SUCCESS TWIN CITIES: $77,872 · EmploymentDRESS FOR SUCCESS SW FLORIDA INC: $74,748 · EmploymentJunior League of Boca Raton Inc: $93,280 · Community ImprovementOPERATION HOMEFRONT INC: $93,280 · Community ImprovementCOMMUNITY PARTNERS: $87,562 · Community ImprovementNORTHEAST FLORIDA WOMENS VETERANS INC: $87,562 · Community ImprovementHOPE THRU SOAP INC: $87,562 · Community ImprovementPOSITIVE IMPACT INTERNATIONAL INC: $74,748 · Community Improvement
Human Services$27,059,790Other$26,518,609Public Safety & Disaster$5,626,794Health$4,652,651Crime & Legal$905,470Employment$654,244Community Improvement$523,994

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFor the Girls Inc: $7,412,206 over 3y, 66% of budgetSOLDIERS' ANGELS: $5,626,794 over 2y, 18% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $4,178,616 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED TERRITORIES OF PACIFIC ISLANDERS WASHINGTON-UTOPIA WA: $2,357,164 over 2y, 65% of budgetTHE STEP SISTERS: $1,794,208 over 2y, 48% of budgetFIGHTING PRETTY INC: $697,912 over 2y, 92% of budgetRICHMOND FRIENDS OF THE HOMELESS LTD: $468,168 over 2y, 16% of budgetPOSITIVE RESULTS CENTER: $309,548 over 1y, 33% of budgetYWCA OF GREATER BATON ROUGE: $181,996 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetBeauty 2 The Streetz: $179,378 over 1y, 15% of budgetBRCA Strong Corp: $170,586 over 1y, 62% of budgetTHE CAREER WARDROBE: $162,050 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE CALIFORNIA: $162,050 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPROJECT BEAUTY SHARE: $162,050 over 1y, 8.1% of budgetCon Mi MADRE: $156,440 over 1y, 16% of budgetROSE HAVEN CIC: $154,208 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetNEWS: $154,208 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetBOTTOMLESS CLOSET: $152,328 over 1y, 8.9% of budgetWesthab Inc: $144,122 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDowntown Streets Inc: $144,122 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetUPWARD BOUND HOUSE: $144,122 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetTEAMIZZY FOUNDATION: $139,706 over 1y, 27% of budgetPINK WARRIOR ADVOCATES: $138,586 over 1y, 44% of budgetWomen Veterans Giving Inc: $138,208 over 1y, 91% of budgetHouse of Cherith Inc: $132,464 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetCENTER OF HOPE: $132,464 over 1y, 14% of budgetFAITHFULLY RESTORED: $131,274 over 1y, 14% of budgetUnite for HER: $131,274 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetSharsheret Inc: $131,274 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetNATIONAL BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $131,274 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPENNSYLVANIA BREAST CANCER COALITION: $131,274 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetNAPA SOLANO SANESART: $129,464 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetPEACE OVER VIOLENCE: $129,464 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetTHE LIFE OF A SINGLE MOM: $125,548 over 1y, 13% of budgetCIRCLE OF HOPE INC: $117,470 over 1y, 8.9% of budget305 Pink Pack Inc: $117,470 over 1y, 36% of budgetMILE HIGH COUNCIL ON ALCOHOLISM AND DRUG ABUSE: $116,660 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTHE TRANSLATIN COALITION: $116,660 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetBREAST FRIENDS: $114,140 over 1y, 28% of budgetADVOCATES AGAINST FAMILY VIOLENCE: $114,140 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetTEEN CANCER AMERICA INC: $114,140 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetCRISIS PREGNANCY CENTER OF MONROVIA: $114,140 over 1y, 55% of budgetFIREFLY SISTERHOOD: $114,140 over 1y, 28% of budgetPROJECT GLIMMER: $107,890 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSINGLE PARENTS ALLIANCE & RESOURCE CENTER INC: $107,890 over 1y, 24% of budgetWOMEN SPEAKING OUT: $107,890 over 1y, 17% of budgetEVERYMIND INC: $107,890 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetBEVERLY'S PGH: $107,890 over 1y, 3.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Mary Kay Ash Foundati…Weingart FoundationKaiser Foundation Hos…Pledgeling FoundationAmerican Eagle Outfit…California Physicians…Conrad N Hilton Found…Dress for Success Wor…Scentsy Family Founda…Good360Baby2babyLiberty Mutual Founda…
Mary Kay Ash FoundationTX18.8× affinity8 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Mary Kay Ash Foundation · Weingart Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Pledgeling Foundation · American Eagle Outfitters Foundation · California Physicians' Service Fdn Dba Blue Shield of California Fdn · Conrad N Hilton Foundation · Dress for Success Worldwide · Scentsy Family Foundation Inc · Good360 · Baby2baby · Liberty Mutual Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization T Causemetics Foundation Dba Thrive Causemetics Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from T Causemetics Foundation Dba Thrive Causemetics Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 190%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • New Avenues for Youth Inc: 20% of income from government
  • Women's Rights Information Center: 16% of income from government
  • Delaware Breast Cancer Coalition Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Sharsheret Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Everymind Inc: 4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
19get no government money at all
39report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 215 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on T Causemetics Foundation Dba Thrive Causemetics’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home