Skip to content

· Private foundation

Sylk Charitable Trust

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$59k
Granted FY2023
17
Grants FY2023
4
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Education$344kHealth$62kArts & Culture$61kReligion$31kHuman Services$18kScience & Tech$12kCrime & Legal$10kPhilanthropy$5kOther$0
02FY2023 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k15 grants · $29k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $31k
$1,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$239k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LYCOMING COLLEGE$20,000
Individual grant recipient$10,800
CHILDRENS CRISIS TREATMENT CTR$5,000
UNIVERSITY OF PA CANCER CTR$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
HAR ZION TEMPLE$4,000
PA ACADEMY OF FINE ARTS$3,000
BULL STONE HOUSE$2,500
WOODMERE ART MUSEUM$1,000
MAGUIRE ART MUSEUM$1,000
Individual grant recipient$750
DO-GOODERS$700
FRIENDS CENTRAL SCHOOL$250
MORRIS ARBORETUM$150
MERION CIVIC ASSN$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–20, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%JCHAI: $1k → 10%JCHAI: $300 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$532k · 23 repeat orgs$35k to everyone else

23 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2023, 14 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
12

Total granted

$532k
$15k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+56%
+73%

Still filing today

26%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
Arts & CultureEducationHealthPhilanthropyCrime & LegalHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LC
    LYCOMING COLLEGE
    7× · 2017–2023 · $170k · revenue +11%
  • CC
    CHILDREN'S CRISIS TREATMENT CENTER
    6× · 2017–2023 · $31k · revenue +56%
  • PHILADELPHIA ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION
    4× · 2017–2020 · $24k · revenue +52%

Funded once

  • BF
    BARNES FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue ×17
  • NC
    NATIONAL CONSTITUTION CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $4k · revenue +182%
  • MK
    MISSION KIDS CHILD ADVOCACY CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $2k · revenue +490%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
2
Dickinson College

Dickinson college provides a useful, innovative and interdisciplinary education in the liberal arts and sciences to prepare students to lead rich and fulfilling lives of engaged global citizenship

Education
3
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
4
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
5
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
6
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
7
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—
8
Regents of the Mercersburg College

At mercersburg academy we embrace the values of hard work, character, and community while learning to balance independence with interdependence and individual humility with collective pride. our students commit to a life of learning, seek…

Education
9
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
10
Williams College

Williams College strives to achieve educational excellence by fostering a community of learning in collaboration with students, faculty, staff, devoted alumni and parents.

Education
11
The Public School of Germantown

Germantown academy inspires students to be independent in thought; confident in expression; compassionate in spirit; collaborative in action; and honorable in deed. germantown academy is a private school educating students from pre-k…

Education
12
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Franklin & Marshall College; the most unlike its peers is Barnes Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
11/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COLUMBIA UNIV BUS SCHOOL: $155,000 · OtherCOLUMBIA UNIV BUS SCHOOLHAR ZION TEMPLE: $25,125 · OtherHAR ZION TEMPLEU OF PA ABRANSON CANCER: $20,000 · OtherU OF PA ABRANSON CANCERUNIVERSITY OF PA-ABRAMSON CANCER: $20,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF PA-ABRAMSON CANCERROMAN CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL: $16,250 · OtherPA ACADEMY OF FINE ARTS: $13,000 · OtherTHE BULL STONE HOUSE FDTN: $12,000 · OtherBSD CODE DESIGN ACADEMY: $11,795 · Other+22 more: $51,275 · Other+22 moreLYCOMING COLLEGE: $170,000 · EducationLYCOMING COLLEGE+2 more: $1,950 · EducationCHILDREN'S CRISIS TREATMENT CENTER: $30,600 · Health+1 more: $100 · HealthPHILADELPHIA ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION: $23,500 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL CONSTITUTION CENTER: $4,000 · Arts & CultureWOODMERE ART MUSEUM: $1,700 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $500 · Arts & CultureBARNES FOUNDATION: $5,000 · PhilanthropyMIDDLE EAST FORUM: $3,000 · InternationalMISSION KIDS CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER: $2,000 · Crime & LegalJUDITH CREED HORIZONS FOR ACHIEVING INDEPENDENCE: $1,300 · Human Services
Other$324,445Education$171,950Health$30,700Arts & Culture$29,700Philanthropy$5,000International$3,000Crime & Legal$2,000Human Services$1,300

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLYCOMING COLLEGE: $170,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S CRISIS TREATMENT CENTER: $30,600 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPHILADELPHIA ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION: $23,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBARNES FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 7.9% of budgetNATIONAL CONSTITUTION CENTER: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMIDDLE EAST FORUM: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMISSION KIDS CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWOODMERE ART MUSEUM: $1,700 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFRANKLIN & MARSHALL COLLEGE: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJUDITH CREED HORIZONS FOR ACHIEVING INDEPENDENCE: $1,300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $450 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS PENNSYLVANIA INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LYCOMING COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S CRISIS TREATMENT CENTER ↗
  • Who funds PHILADELPHIA ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds BARNES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL CONSTITUTION CENTER ↗
  • Who funds MIDDLE EAST FORUM ↗
  • Who funds MISSION KIDS CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds WOODMERE ART MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds FRANKLIN & MARSHALL COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds JUDITH CREED HORIZONS FOR ACHIEVING INDEPENDENCE ↗
  • Who funds VICTOR D'AMICO INSTITUTE OF ART ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Erlbaum Family FoundationPA15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Erlbaum Family Foundation · Daniel M Tabas Family Foundation · The Saramar Charitable Fund · The Snider Foundation · The Philadelphia Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sylk Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sylk Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Sylk’s filings →

    More from the funding graph