Skip to content

· Private foundation

Sylarn Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.4M
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$1.1M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$11MCrime & Legal$1.7MEducation$1.6MArts & Culture$798kHousing & Shelter$773kPublic Benefit$710kPhilanthropy$250kReligion$160kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $100k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $240k
  • $250k+1 grant · $1.1M
$75,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$5.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN$1,091,600
NMU FOUNDATION$165,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AM$75,000
BEACON HOUSE$45,000
MIKVA CHALLENGE - DC$30,000
THE JEWISH FEDERATION OF SARASOTA -$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $1.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BROADWAY ADVOCACY COALITION INC: $5k → 17%ACCESS YOUTH INC: $460k → 14%ACCESS YOUTH INC: $285k → 14%ACCESS YOUTH INC: $237k → 14%ACCESS YOUTH INC: $200k → 14%ACCESS YOUTH INC: $187k → 14%ACCESS YOUTH INC: $175k → 14%ACCESS YOUTH INC: $175k → 14%ACCESS YOUTH INC: $25k → 14%REACH INCORPORATED: $15k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
CA
MD
DC
MS
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$17M · 18 repeat orgs$396k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +69% since the first grant, against -16% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
7

Total granted

$17M
$396k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+69%
-16%

Still filing today

67%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesHealthArts & CultureCivil RightsFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    University of Michigan
    9× · 2017–2025 · $8.8M · revenue +202%
  • BC
    BAY CLIFF HEALTH CAMP
    4× · 2019–2023 · $2.3M · revenue +9%
  • AI
    ACCESS INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.7M · revenue +185% · 39% of their budget

Funded once

  • DP
    DC PUBLIC SCHOOLS
    one grant, 2017 · $200k
  • TB
    TEMPLE BETH SHOLOM
    one grant, 2017 · $160k
  • REACH EDUCATION INC
    one grant, 2019 · $15k · revenue -16%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
2
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
3
Council for Court Excellence

Council for court excellence's (cce's) mission is to bring people together to conduct research, educate, and advocate to make d.c.'s unique legal systems more just, equitable, and accountable to the community.

—
4
Reach Prep Inc

Provide transformative educational experiences that empower underserved students

Education
5
National College Advising Corps Inc

College advising corps (cac) is the nation's largest nonprofit service organization dedicated to advancing educational equity and expanding opportunity for all high school students. cac provides college enrollment and career guidance to…

Education
6
The Chicago Scholars Foundation

Chicago scholars is transforming the leadership landscape of our city by resolving the fundamental barriers to success for academically driven, first generation college students from under-resourced communities.

Education
7
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
8
College Summit Inc

College summit, inc. d/b/a peerforward (peerforward)'s mission is to unleash the power of positive peer influence to transform the lives of youth living in low-income communities by connecting them to college and careers. in low-income…

Education
9
World Affairs Councils of America

The world affairs councils of america supports, strengthens, and represents a national network of 90 nonpartisan organizations working to deepen their communities' global perspective.

International
10
American Association of University Women Inc

Aauw advances gender equity for women and girls through research, education, and advocacy.

Education
11
Youth Communication Ny Center Inc

Youth communication elevates teen voices to create real change. through the power of true stories, written by youth who have been systemically marginalized, we create more supportive and successful learning communities. youth…

Arts & Culture
12
Read Alliance Inc

Read alliance, inc (read alliance) works to accelerate the educational trajectory of early elementary students through the power of teens who provide one-to-one literacy tutoring in under-resourced communities. read impacts two populations…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Shoutmousepressinc; the most unlike its peers is University of Michigan. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
14/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

University of Michigan: $8,827,607 · OtherUniversity of MichiganBAY CLIFF HEALTH CAMP: $2,322,068 · OtherBAY CLIFF HEALTH CAMPNMU FOUNDATION: $1,745,000 · OtherNMU FOUNDATIONBEACON HOUSE: $508,000 · Other+11 more: $607,795 · OtherACCESS INC: $1,743,750 · Human ServicesACCESS INC+2 more: $20,000 · Human ServicesMIKVA CHALLENGE GRANT FOUNDATION: $510,000 · EducationCollege Success Foundation - District of Columbia: $254,525 · EducationAMERICAN UNIVERSITY: $115,615 · Education+1 more: $25,000 · EducationPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $325,000 · HealthTHRIVE DC: $265,000 · Food & NutritionTHE JEWISH FEDERATION OF SARASOTA-MANATEE INC: $150,000 · PhilanthropyTHE JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC: $15,000 · PhilanthropySHOUTMOUSEPRESSINC: $155,500 · Arts & Culture
Other$14,010,470Human Services$1,763,750Education$905,140Health$325,000Food & Nutrition$265,000Philanthropy$165,000Arts & Culture$155,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBAY CLIFF HEALTH CAMP: $2,322,068 over 4y, 25% of budgetACCESS INC: $1,743,750 over 8y, 39% of budgetMIKVA CHALLENGE GRANT FOUNDATION: $510,000 over 9y, 2.3% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $325,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHRIVE DC: $265,000 over 4y, 2.7% of budgetCollege Success Foundation - District of Columbia: $254,525 over 7y, 2.6% of budgetSHOUTMOUSEPRESSINC: $155,500 over 6y, 13% of budgetTHE JEWISH FEDERATION OF SARASOTA-MANATEE INC: $150,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetAMERICAN UNIVERSITY: $115,615 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC: $47,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLATIN AMERICAN YOUTH CENTER: $40,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetScholarCHIPS Inc: $25,000 over 4y, 5.5% of budgetTHE JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetREACH EDUCATION INC: $15,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetBROADWAY ADVOCACY COALITION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds University of Michigan ↗
  • Who funds BAY CLIFF HEALTH CAMP ↗
  • Who funds ACCESS INC ↗
  • Who funds MIKVA CHALLENGE GRANT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds THRIVE DC ↗
  • Who funds College Success Foundation - District of Columbia ↗
  • Who funds SHOUTMOUSEPRESSINC ↗
  • Who funds THE JEWISH FEDERATION OF SARASOTA-MANATEE INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC ↗
  • Who funds LATIN AMERICAN YOUTH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds ScholarCHIPS Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC ↗
  • Who funds REACH EDUCATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BROADWAY ADVOCACY COALITION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Morris and Gwendolyn Cafritz FoundationDC17.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Morris and Gwendolyn Cafritz Foundation · Greater Washington Community Foundation · Luther I Replogle Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sylarn Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sylarn Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Sylarn Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Sylarn Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Sylarn’s filings →

    More from the funding graph