Skip to content

Arizona · Public charity

Swift Charities Inc

To provide assistance to employees of swift transportation in dire need, to provide scholarships for the children and to improve their communities through charitable giving.

$1.2M
Granted FY2019
6
Itemized grants FY2019
6
Organizations funded FY2019
17%
First-time grantees FY2019
Read the full brief

Read this first · the figures below need context

68% of Swift Charities Inc’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Arizona Community Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 1 organization directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2019, the last year Swift Charities Inc named its own grantees at scale: 6 organizations, $237k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

4
’17
12
’18
6
’19
1
’20
1
’21
1
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

Itemized, FY2019
$237k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2019
$25,000
Largest grant, FY2019
$100,000
Organizations funded a year
4 to 12
FY2017 to FY2019
States reached, FY2019
2
Total assets, FY2019
$1.0M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2019, 17% of the organizations Swift Charities Inc funded were first-time grantees, receiving 17% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2019, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $40k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19
HealthHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentPublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY20196$237k17%
FY201812$404k92%
FY20174$165kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$719kHealth$535kYouth Development$190kHuman Services$150kFood & Nutrition$45kEmployment$25kRecreation & Sports$19kArts & Culture$10kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 17 grantees

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Swift Charities Inc supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetChildren's Miracle Network: $291,178 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetMiracle Hill Ministries Inc: $150,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetPlayworks Education Energized: $150,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetAbility360 Inc: $55,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJewish Family and Children's Service Inc: $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHacienda Inc: $47,017 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSt Mary's Food Bank Alliance: $45,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHomeless Youth Connection Inc: $40,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetVetJobs Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCancer Support Community Arizona: $25,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetFoundation for Blind Children: $22,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSpecial Olympics Arizona Inc: $11,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetArizona Trucking Association Foundation: $10,000 over 1y, 8.7% of budgetThe Phoenix Theatre Company and Subsidiary: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTruckers Against Trafficking: $10,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetJunior Golf Association of Arizona Foundation: $7,500 over 1y, 12% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 16.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arizona Community FoundationAZ18.8× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arizona Community Foundation · The Diane and Bruce Halle Foundation · BHHS Legacy Foundation · Thunderbirds Charities · Virginia G Piper Charitable Trust · Phoenix Suns Charities Inc · The Foundation for Community and Health Advancement · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Swift Charities Inc with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Swift Charities Inc?

Find your warmest path to Swift Charities Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Swift Charities Inc

How much does Swift Charities Inc give?
Swift Charities Inc reported 6 itemized grants totaling $237,017, out of $1,191,461 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2019 IRS filing. It funded between 4 and 12 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2019.
What does Swift Charities Inc fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2024, its largest causes are Education (42%), Health (31%), Youth Development (11%).
Who are Swift Charities Inc's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2024: Children's Miracle Network ($291k), Miracle Hill Ministries Inc ($150k), Playworks Education Energized ($150k).
Does Swift Charities Inc fund new organizations?
In FY2019, 17% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as Swift Charities Inc?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Arizona Community Foundation, The Diane and Bruce Halle Foundation, BHHS Legacy Foundation.
Where is Swift Charities Inc based?
Swift Charities Inc is based in AZ.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Swift Charities’ filings →

More from the funding graph