Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Swenson Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$6.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
33
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$1.6M
Largest
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$23MReligion$15MRecreation & Sports$5.2MHealth$4.9MHuman Services$1.7MArts & Culture$507kAnimals$225kFood & Nutrition$150kOther$0
02FY2025 · 33 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $290k
  • $50k–250k13 grants · $1.2M
  • $250k+6 grants · $4.6M
$50,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$94M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY MN DULUTH$1,600,000
CHOC CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION$1,000,000
FRIENDS OF HOLY INNOCENTS$500,000
CHAPMAN UNIVERSITY$500,000
CALIFORNIA LUTHERAN UNIVERSITY$500,000
CHAPMAN UNIVERSITY$500,000
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SUPERIOR FOUNDATION INC$218,041
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SUPERIOR FOUNDATION INC$218,041
UNIVERSITY MN DULUTH$132,000
THE DOLLYWOOD FOUNDATION$125,000
OLIVE CREST$100,000
OCEAN INSTITUTE$70,000
LUTHERAN BIBLE TRANSLATORS$62,500
HUNGRY FOR MUSIC$62,500
CALIFORNIA LUTHERAN UNIVERSITY$50,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $221k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 47% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%LUTHERAN CHURCH CHARITIES: $63k → 14%LUTHERAN CHURCH CHARITIES: $42k → 14%FURNISHING HOPE: $42k → 10%FURNISHING HOPE: $35k → 10%FURNISHING HOPE: $20k → 10%FURNISHING HOPE: $20k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
MT
MN
IL
WI
OR
IN
CA
UT
MO
VA
AZ
DC
AL
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 6% of Swenson Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Swenson Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 4.4% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$50M · 35 repeat orgs$1.1M to everyone else

35 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

35
16

Total granted

$50M
$840k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+7%
+56%

Still filing today

49%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $215k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureHealthReligionAnimalsHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-SUPERIOR ALUMNI AND FRIENDS FOUNDATION INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $8.8M · revenue +100% · 65% of their budget
  • CL
    CALIFORNIA LUTHERAN UNIVERSITY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $7.1M · revenue +18%
  • CF
    CHOC FOUNDATION
    6× · 2019–2025 · $3.2M · revenue +60%

Funded once

  • SHARE OUR STRENGTH
    one grant, 2023 · $125k · revenue +8%
  • IL
    IMAGINATION LIBRARY INC
    one grant, 2022 · $125k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $100k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
2
Augustana University Association

Inspired by lutheran scholarly tradition and the liberal arts, augustana provides an education of enduring worth that challenges the intellect, fosters integrity and integrates faith with learning and service in a diverse world.

Education
3
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
4
University of the Sciences in Philadelphia

University of the sciences prepares students to become leaders, innovators, and skilled practitioners in the sciences, the health professions, and related disciplines. we deliver excellence in teaching, research, and service through a safe…

5
Whitworth University

Since 1890, whitworth has held fast to its founding mission of providing "an education of mind and heart" through rigorous intellectual inquiry guided by dedicated christian scholars.

Education
6
Los Angeles Pacific University

Los angeles pacific university exists to deliver high quality, accessible christ-centered education to learners everywhere.

Education
7
President-Board of Trustees Santa Clara College

Scu is a catholic and jesuit institution that makes student learning its central focus, promotes faculty and staff learning in its various forms, and exhibits organizational learning.

Education
8
Ashland University

Ashland university, guided by our christian heritage, is a comprehensive, private university that provides a transformative learning experience, shaping graduates who work, serve and lead with integrity in their local, national, and global…

Education
9
Arizona Christian University

Arizona christian university provides a biblically-integrated, liberal arts education equipping graduates to serve the lord jesus christ in all aspects of life, as leaders of influence and excellence.

Education
10
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

11
Lawrence University of Wisconsin

Lawrence university of wisconsin, through its undergraduate residential college and conservatory of music, educates students in the liberal arts and sciences. the university is devoted to excellence and integrity in all of its activities…

Education
12
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Olive Crest and the most unlike its peers is Friends of Holy Innocents. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity Health CentersPublic University Foundatio…Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Child and Family ServicesCommunity Arts OrganizationsClassical Music EnsemblesFood Pantries & AssistanceWildlife Rehabilitation Cen…Christian Missionary Organi…Animal Rescue and AdoptionLand Conservation Organizat…Cancer Support Organizations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%6%<5yr15%0%5–10yr20%12%10–20yr17%30%20–35yr11%24%35–55yr13%27%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%7%<5yr15%0%5–10yr20%1%10–20yr17%21%20–35yr11%44%35–55yr13%28%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 7% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 3% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
3%1/35
the rest of the field
14%
26,002/186,943

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 60 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/29
Grantees still filing
16/29
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNIVERSITY MN DULUTH — $9,098,405 · OtherUNIVERSITY MN DULUTHGLORIA DEI LUTHERAN CHURCH — $5,291,100 · OtherGLORIA DEI LUTHERAN CHURCHBIG SKY BIBLE CHURCH — $3,500,000 · OtherBIG SKY BIBLE CHURCHCHURCH OF THE HOLY INNOCENTS — $1,000,000 · Other+34 more — $2,923,498 · Other+34 moreUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-SUPERIOR ALUMNI AND FRIENDS FOUNDATION INC — $8,828,007 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-SUPERIOR ALUMNI AND…CALIFORNIA LUTHERAN UNIVERSITY — $7,081,170 · EducationCALIFORNIA LUTHERAN UNIVERSITYCHAPMAN UNIVERSITY — $3,083,334 · EducationCHAPMAN UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION — $668,213 · Education+1 more — $100,000 · EducationFRIENDS OF HOLY INNOCENTS — $2,500,000 · ReligionFRIENDS OF…OCEAN INSTITUTE — $2,184,833 · ReligionOCEAN INST…+1 more — $75,000 · ReligionCHOC FOUNDATION — $3,246,667 · HealthCHOC FOUN…OLIVE CREST — $850,000 · HealthOLIVE CRE…+2 more — $75,000 · HealthSegerstrom Center for the Arts — $175,000 · Arts & CultureEDUCATION THROUGH MUSIC — $75,000 · Arts & CultureSUPERIOR PUBLIC MUSEUMS — $62,500 · Arts & CultureHUNGRY FOR MUSIC — $62,500 · Arts & CultureLUCIUS WOODS PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC — $40,000 · Arts & CultureTHE DAVID SHELDRICK WILDLIFE TRUST USA INC — $75,000 · AnimalsBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY — $75,000 · AnimalsANIMAL WELFARE INSTITUTE — $75,000 · AnimalsFURNISHING HOPE INC — $116,667 · Human ServicesLUTHERAN CHURCH CHARITIES FUND — $104,166 · Human Services
Other$21,813,003Education$19,760,724Religion$4,759,833Health$4,171,667Arts & Culture$415,000Animals$225,000Human Services$220,833

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-SUPERIOR ALUMNI AND FRIENDS FOUNDATION INC — $8,828,007 over 7y, 65% of budgetCALIFORNIA LUTHERAN UNIVERSITY — $7,081,170 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetCHOC FOUNDATION — $3,246,667 over 6y, 1.8% of budgetCHAPMAN UNIVERSITY — $3,083,334 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF HOLY INNOCENTS — $2,500,000 over 4y, 100% of budgetOCEAN INSTITUTE — $2,184,833 over 8y, 12% of budgetOLIVE CREST — $850,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION — $668,213 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSegerstrom Center for the Arts — $175,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSHARE OUR STRENGTH — $125,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFURNISHING HOPE INC — $116,667 over 4y, 4.2% of budgetLUTHERAN CHURCH CHARITIES FUND — $104,166 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetAchievement Institute for STEM Scholars — $100,000 over 2y, 18% of budgetTHE DAVID SHELDRICK WILDLIFE TRUST USA INC — $75,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY — $75,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLUTHERAN BIBLE TRANSLATORS INC — $75,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetANIMAL WELFARE INSTITUTE — $75,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetSUPERIOR PUBLIC MUSEUMS — $62,500 over 1y, 21% of budgetGIVSUM FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 1y, 27% of budgetLUCIUS WOODS PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC — $40,000 over 2y, 19% of budgetLIVING DESERT THE — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCONCORDIA COLLEGE CORPORATION — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPHIL'S FRIENDS NFP — $25,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetWORLD VISION INC — $5,120 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY ALUMNI ASSOCIATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGENERAL FEDERATION OF WOMENS CLUBS — $5,000 over 1y, 4.9% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-SUPERIOR ALUMNI AND FRIENDS FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA LUTHERAN UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds CHOC FOUNDATION
  • Who funds CHAPMAN UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF HOLY INNOCENTS
  • Who funds OCEAN INSTITUTE
  • Who funds OLIVE CREST
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Segerstrom Center for the Arts
  • Who funds SHARE OUR STRENGTH
  • Who funds FURNISHING HOPE INC
  • Who funds LUTHERAN CHURCH CHARITIES FUND
  • Who funds Achievement Institute for STEM Scholars
  • Who funds THE DAVID SHELDRICK WILDLIFE TRUST USA INC
  • Who funds BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY
  • Who funds LUTHERAN BIBLE TRANSLATORS INC
  • Who funds ANIMAL WELFARE INSTITUTE
  • Who funds EDUCATION THROUGH MUSIC
  • Who funds SUPERIOR PUBLIC MUSEUMS
  • Who funds HUNGRY FOR MUSIC
  • Who funds GIVSUM FOUNDATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Orange County Community FoundationCA14.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Orange County Community Foundation · AbbVie Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Swenson Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Swenson Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Swenson Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 60 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph