Skip to content

Colorado · Public charity

Swedish Medical Center Auxiliary

The exempt purpose is to provide caring service to improve the health and well being of patients (and their families, visitors, and hospital employees) at swedish medical center, as well as providing services to improve the health of the community.

$957k
Granted FY2019
15
Itemized grants FY2019
15
Organizations funded FY2019
80%
First-time grantees FY2019
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2019
$921k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2019
$12,000
Largest grant, FY2019
$315,000
Organizations funded a year
4 to 15
FY2018 to FY2019
States reached, FY2019
2

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2019, 80% of the organizations Swedish Medical Center Auxiliary funded were first-time grantees, receiving 78% of its grant dollars.

The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY201915$921k80%
FY20184$18kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2019.

Health$519kEducation$315kHuman Services$89kReligion$10kAnimals$5kFood & Nutrition$1k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2018 to FY2019, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 12 grantees
All grantees of Swedish Medical Center Auxiliary by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Regis University$315,00010%
Doctors Care$199,00027%
Listen Foundation Inc$155,000128%
Craig Hospital Foundation$152,87512%
The Hca Hope Fund$30,00010%
Wellspring Community$15,00011%
Integrated Family Community Services$15,00011%
Clothes to Kids of Denver Inc$10,00011%
Colorado Neurological Institute$6,00011%
Denver Pet Partners$5,000113%
Denver Rescue Mission$2,00010%
Food Bank of the Rockies$1,00010%

Plus 4 recipients with no EIN on record ($33k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Swedish Medical Center Auxiliary supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 1 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 12 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRegis University: $315,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetDoctors Care: $199,000 over 2y, 7.5% of budgetListen Foundation Inc: $155,000 over 1y, 28% of budgetCraig Hospital Foundation: $152,875 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetThe Hca Hope Fund: $30,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWellspring Community: $15,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetIntegrated Family Community Services: $15,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetClothes to Kids of Denver Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetColorado Neurological Institute: $6,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetDenver Pet Partners: $5,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetDenver Rescue Mission: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFood Bank of the Rockies: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 12.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Colorado Gives FoundationCO19× affinity7 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · Schlessman Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Swedish Medical Center Auxiliary with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Swedish Medical Center Auxiliary?

Find your warmest path to Swedish Medical Center Auxiliary through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Swedish Medical Center Auxiliary

How much does Swedish Medical Center Auxiliary give?
Swedish Medical Center Auxiliary reported 15 itemized grants totaling $921,158, out of $957,144 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2019 IRS filing. It funded between 4 and 15 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2019.
What does Swedish Medical Center Auxiliary fund?
By grant dollars over FY2018 to FY2019, its largest causes are Health (55%), Education (34%), Human Services (9%).
Who are Swedish Medical Center Auxiliary's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2018 to FY2019: Regis University ($315k), Doctors Care ($199k), Listen Foundation Inc ($155k).
Does Swedish Medical Center Auxiliary fund new organizations?
In FY2019, 80% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as Swedish Medical Center Auxiliary?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Colorado Gives Foundation, Schlessman Foundation Inc, American Online Giving Foundation Inc.
Where is Swedish Medical Center Auxiliary based?
Swedish Medical Center Auxiliary is based in CO.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Swedish Medical Center Auxiliary’s filings →

More from the funding graph