Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Swedish Health Services

To improve the health and well-being of each person we serve.

$1.1M
Granted FY2024still arriving
39
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$270k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Health$27MHousing & Shelter$5.2MHuman Services$687kEmployment$527kCommunity Improvement$409kEducation$330kArts & Culture$270kYouth Development$233kOther$0
02FY2024 · 39 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 39 grants below total $1,124,409 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,149,409 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $25,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k33 grants · $665k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $174k
  • $250k+1 grant · $270k
$20,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$3.7B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SEATTLE SCIENCE FOUNDATION$270,000
ASIAN COUNSELING AND REFERRAL SERVICE$63,500
HOPELINK$55,000
KIN ON HEALTHARK AND WINNI$55,000
CANCER LIFELINE$45,000
ALZHEIMERS ASSOC$35,000
SEATTLE UNIVERSITY$30,000
LIFELONG$30,000
REFUGEE ARTISAN INITIATIVE$30,000
MEDICAL TEAMS INTERNATIONAL$30,000
NORTHWEST HOPE & HEALING FOUNDATION$30,000
SOUND GENERATIONS$29,909
NORTHWEST KIDNEY CENTERS$26,000
COLORECTAL CANCER ALLIANCE INC$25,000
COMMUNITY LUNCH CAPITOL HILL$25,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $787k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%LIFEWIRE: $15k → 9%ASIAN COUNSELING AND REFERRAL SERVICE: $64k → 9%ASIAN COUNSELING AND REFERRAL SERVICE: $20k → 9%EL CENTRO DE LA RAZA: $13k → 9%ASIAN COUNSELING AND REFERRAL SERVICE: $10k → 9%ASIAN COUNSELING AND REFERRAL SERVICE: $10k → 9%ASIAN COUNSELING AND REFERRAL SERVICE: $10k → 9%ASIAN COUNSELING AND REFERRAL SERVICE: $10k → 9%NORTHWEST SARCOMA FOUNDATION: $10k → 9%EL CENTRO DE LA RAZA: $10k → 9%NW SARCOMA FOUNDATION: $10k → 9%SOLID GROUND: $10k → 9%HOPELINK: $55k → 9%HOPELINK: $10k → 9%HOPELINK: $8k → 9%FOUNDATION OF THE ROTARY CLUB OF MERCER ISLAND: $30k → 9%YWCA OF SEATTLE-KING COUNTY-SNOHOMISH COUNTY: $50k → 9%WELLSPRING FAMILY SERVICES EAP: $10k → 9%WELLSPRING FAMILY SERVICES EAP: $10k → 9%SOUND GENERATIONS: $51k → 9%YWCA OF SEATTLE - KING - SNOHOMISH: $10k → 9%SOUND GENERATIONS: $45k → 9%BYRD BARR PLACE: $10k → 9%SOUND GENERATIONS: $40k → 9%SOUND GENERATIONS: $30k → 9%SOUND GENERATIONS: $20k → 9%YWCA OF SEATTLE-KING COUNTY-SNOHOMISH COUNTY: $8k → 9%SOUND GENERATIONS: $20k → 9%SOUND GENERATIONS: $10k → 9%YWCA OF SEATTLE-KING COUNTY-SNOHOMISH COUNTY: $8k → 9%REAL CHANGE HOMELESS EMPOWERMENT PROJECT: $15k → 9%YMCA OF GREATER SEATTLE: $13k → 9%ELIZABETH GREGORY HOME: $20k → 9%SOMALI HEALTH BOARD: $10k → 9%FILIPINO COMMUNITY OF SEATTLE: $23k → 9%NAMI WANAMI WALK: $10k → 9%SOMALI HEALTH BOARD: $10k → 9%CHINESE INFO AND SERVICE CENTER: $8k → 9%NAMI WANAMI WALK: $10k → 9%SOMALI HEALTH BOARD: $10k → 9%CHINESE INFORMATION AND SERVICE CENTER: $8k → 9%ELIZABETH GREGORY HOME: $10k → 9%LUTHERAN COMMUNITY SERVICES NW: $8k → 9%FILIPINO COMMUNITY OF SEATTLE: $10k → 9%LUTHERAN COMMUNITY SERVICES NW: $8k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
NY
MA
OR
CA
VA
DC
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$34M · 75 repeat orgs$984k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +28% since the first grant, against +8% for the ones you funded once.

75 repeat relationships — 36 still active in FY2024, 39 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

75
38

Total granted

$34M
$686k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+8%

Still filing today

91%
66%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $298k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesEducationCommunity ImprovementArts & CultureRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SWEDISH MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION
    4× · 2017–2023 · $23M · revenue +400% · 29% of their budget
  • PH
    PLYMOUTH HOUSING GROUP AND SUBSIDIARIES
    4× · 2018–2023 · $5.1M · revenue +108%
  • PA
    Project Access Northwest
    4× · 2017–2020 · $300k · revenue +36%

Funded once

  • PM
    PROLIANCE MINOR AND JAMES SURGICAL SPECIALISTS
    one grant, 2017 · $108k
  • YEAR UP INC
    one grant, 2018 · $52k · revenue -11%
  • CI
    CAREERWORKS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $50k · revenue +84%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Emergency Medical Services at the University of Washington
Health
2
North Olympic Healthcare Network

To provide patient-centered, quality-driven, whole-person healthcare services, accessible to everyone in our community.

Health
3
The Seattle Chapter American Institute of Archite

We champion the central role of architects in creating and sustaining a better built environment.

—
4
Uw Physicians Network

To improve the health of the public.

Education
5
Washington Association for Community Health

The mission of washington association for community health is to strengthen and advocate for washington's community health centers (chcs) as they build healthcare access, innovation, and value. the association provides training and…

—
6
Swedish Health Services

To improve the health and well-being of each person we serve.

Health
7
Legacy Salmon Creek Hospital

Legacy Salmon Creek Hospital (LSCH), established in 2005, provides acute and critical care in Vancouver, with 165 licensed beds. LSCH operates adult, pediatric, and OB/GYN hospitalist programs, as well as four primary care physician…

Health
8
Planned Parenthood of Greater Washington and North Idaho

To provide exceptional reproductive and complementary health care services, honest education, and advocacy for all.

Health
9
Washington Physicians for Social Responsibility

Washington Physicians for Social Responsibility engages the community to create a healthy, just, peaceful and sustainable world. We take on the gravest current threats to human health and survival -- nuclear weapons, economic inequity, and…

International
10
Disability Rights Washington

Disability rights washington's mission is to advance the dignity, equality, and self determination of people with disabilities. we work to pursue justice on matters related to human and legal rights.

Human Services
11
Northwest Health Law Advocates

NoHLA works toward achieving a health care system in which all individuals receive quality, affordable health care, provided on an equitable and timely basis, and are assured of basic rights and protections. NoHLA conducts outreach,…

Health
12
Wenatchee Valley Hospital

We are dedicated to improving our patients' health by providing safe, high-quality care in a compassionate and cost-effective manner.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Seattle Roots Community Health and the most unlike its peers is P4 Medicine Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyHomeless Services & ShelterFaith-Based Health SystemsProfessional Trade Associat…International Development &…Community Grantmaking Found…Faith-Based Healthcare Syst…Food Assistance and Hunger …Stem Education & Career Pat…Youth Mentoring & Developme…Regional Economic Developme…Legal Advocacy & JusticeAffordable Housing Developm…Washington State Policy Adv…Private Membership ClubsFamily Philanthropic Founda…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number23%1%<5yr15%4%5–10yr19%16%10–20yr19%35%20–35yr12%26%35–55yr12%17%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value23%0%<5yr15%1%5–10yr19%4%10–20yr19%6%20–35yr12%85%35–55yr12%4%55yr+

The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%2/116
the rest of the field
14%
1,717/12,623

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

102 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 102 of the 117 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
18
Early backer (in before they grew)
97/102
Grantees still filing
66/102
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SWEDISH MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $22,888,898 · HealthSWEDISH MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION+43 more — $3,701,608 · Health+43 morePLYMOUTH HOUSING GROUP AND SUBSIDIARIES — $5,076,025 · Housing & ShelterPLYMOUTH HOUSING…+1 more — $12,500 · Housing & ShelterSEATTLE UNIVERSITY — $172,500 · OtherPROLIANCE MINOR AND JAMES SURGICAL SPECIALISTS — $108,386 · OtherSUSAN G KOMEN PUGET SOUND AFFILIATE — $100,000 · OtherSEAFAIR FOUNDATION — $95,000 · OtherMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED — $94,918 · OtherFOUNDATION FOR PRIVATE ENTERPRISE — $92,500 · OtherROTARY CLUB OF MERCER ISLAND — $90,000 · OtherLife Support — $55,000 · OtherGirls on the Run Puget Sound — $98,400 · OtherSeattle Center Foundation — $100,000 · Other+27 more — $559,215 · OtherSOUND GENERATIONS — $216,384 · Human ServicesASIAN COUNSELING AND REFERRAL SERVICE — $123,500 · Human ServicesYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SEATTLE-KING COUNTY-SNOHOMISH COUNTY — $112,508 · Human ServicesHOPELINK — $72,500 · Human ServicesFILIPINO COMMUNITY OF SEATTLE — $32,500 · Human ServicesSOMALI HEALTH BOARD — $30,000 · Human ServicesElizabeth Home — $30,000 · Human ServicesFOUNDATION OF THE ROTARY CLUB OF MERCER ISLAND — $30,000 · Human Services+12 more — $197,050 · Human ServicesGREATER SEATTLE PARTNERS — $300,000 · Community ImprovementINTERIM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION — $158,500 · Community ImprovementRefugee Artisan Initative — $85,000 · Community Improvement+1 more — $15,000 · Community ImprovementPROJECT LIFELONG — $105,000 · EducationRENTON TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $94,500 · EducationTHE FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE OF WASHINGTON — $70,000 · EducationUNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC — $60,000 · EducationYEAR UP INC — $52,000 · EducationCAREERWORKS INC — $50,000 · EducationAlliance for Education — $48,500 · EducationKD HALL FOUNDATION — $35,000 · Education+1 more — $9,000 · EducationMEDICAL TEAMS INTERNATIONAL — $201,650 · International
Health$26,590,506Housing & Shelter$5,088,525Other$1,565,919Human Services$844,442Community Improvement$558,500Education$524,000International$201,650

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSWEDISH MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $22,888,898 over 4y, 29% of budgetPLYMOUTH HOUSING GROUP AND SUBSIDIARIES — $5,076,025 over 4y, 8.3% of budgetGLOBAL TO LOCAL HEALTH INITIATIVE — $460,000 over 2y, 17% of budgetGREATER SEATTLE PARTNERS — $300,000 over 2y, 16% of budgetProject Access Northwest — $300,000 over 4y, 4.8% of budgetSeattle Science Foundation — $270,000 over 1y, 9.5% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $220,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSOUND GENERATIONS — $216,384 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC — $214,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMEDICAL TEAMS INTERNATIONAL — $201,650 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetLIFELONG HEALTH FOR ALL — $195,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetWASHINGTON POISON CENTER — $181,000 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetSEATTLE UNIVERSITY — $172,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCANCER LIFELINE — $164,000 over 8y, 2.9% of budgetNORTHWEST HOPE & HEALING FOUNDATION — $159,950 over 8y, 6.4% of budgetINTERIM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION — $158,500 over 4y, 5.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $140,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Diabetes Association — $135,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetASIAN COUNSELING AND REFERRAL SERVICE — $123,500 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetHARMONY HILL OF UNION — $121,516 over 3y, 4.8% of budgetYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SEATTLE-KING COUNTY-SNOHOMISH COUNTY — $112,508 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetNORTHWEST KIDNEY CENTERS — $106,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT LIFELONG — $105,000 over 3y, 22% of budgetSeattle Center Foundation — $100,000 over 7y, 2.6% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $100,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGirls on the Run Puget Sound — $98,400 over 5y, 4.1% of budgetSEAFAIR FOUNDATION — $95,000 over 3y, 18% of budgetRENTON TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $94,500 over 7y, 2.9% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR PRIVATE ENTERPRISE — $92,500 over 5y, 7.5% of budgetROTARY CLUB OF MERCER ISLAND — $90,000 over 3y, 38% of budgetSEATTLE ROOTS COMMUNITY HEALTH — $90,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetKIN ON HEALTH CARE CENTER — $90,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetRefugee Artisan Initative — $85,000 over 3y, 5.9% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $75,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHOPELINK — $72,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE OF WASHINGTON — $70,000 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY — $61,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC — $60,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLife Support — $55,000 over 6y, 4.6% of budgetYEAR UP INC — $52,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC — $50,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCAREERWORKS INC — $50,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetCOLORECTAL CANCER ALLIANCE — $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWASHINGTON STATE HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION — $49,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC — $49,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAlliance for Education — $48,500 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetCascade Bicycle Club — $48,390 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY LUNCH ON CAPITOL HILL — $45,000 over 2y, 5.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SWEDISH MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PLYMOUTH HOUSING GROUP AND SUBSIDIARIES ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL TO LOCAL HEALTH INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds GREATER SEATTLE PARTNERS ↗
  • Who funds Project Access Northwest ↗
  • Who funds Seattle Science Foundation ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds SOUND GENERATIONS ↗
  • Who funds MARCH OF DIMES INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDICAL TEAMS INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds LIFELONG HEALTH FOR ALL ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON POISON CENTER ↗
  • Who funds SEATTLE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds CANCER LIFELINE ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWEST HOPE & HEALING FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds INTERIM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds American Diabetes Association ↗
  • Who funds ASIAN COUNSELING AND REFERRAL SERVICE ↗
  • Who funds HARMONY HILL OF UNION ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SEATTLE-KING COUNTY-SNOHOMISH COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWEST KIDNEY CENTERS ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT LIFELONG ↗
  • Who funds Seattle Center Foundation ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds Girls on the Run Puget Sound ↗
  • Who funds SEAFAIR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds RENTON TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR PRIVATE ENTERPRISE ↗
  • Who funds ROTARY CLUB OF MERCER ISLAND ↗
  • Who funds SEATTLE ROOTS COMMUNITY HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds KIN ON HEALTH CARE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Refugee Artisan Initative ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HOPELINK ↗
  • Who funds THE FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE OF WASHINGTON ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Seattle FoundationPuget Sound Energy Fo…United Way of King Co…The Norcliffe Foundat…Lucky Seven FoundationKaiser Foundation Hea…Credit Unions in the …Gates FoundationMoccasin Lake Foundat…Sheng-Yen Lu Foundati…Food LifelineFred Hutchinson Cance…
Seattle FoundationWA60.2× affinity42 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Seattle Foundation · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · United Way of King County · The Norcliffe Foundation · Lucky Seven Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of Washington · Credit Unions in the State of Washington · Gates Foundation · Moccasin Lake Foundation · Sheng-Yen Lu Foundation · Food Lifeline · Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Swedish Health Services funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 14%
  • Medical Teams International — 14% of income from government
  • Year Up Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
35report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 117 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines