Skip to content

· Private foundation

Suzanne Cohn Simon Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$84k
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$176kFood & Nutrition$143kInternational$118kAnimals$62kHuman Services$53kArts & Culture$50kCivil Rights$5kCommunity Improvement$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k11 grants · $34k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $50k
$5,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$467k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY$20,000
CHILDREN OF HEROES OF UKRAINE - GLOBAL GIVING$20,000
THE GOOD FOOD INSTITUTE$10,000
ANIMAL EQUALITY$7,500
LEVER FOUNDATION$5,000
ALLIED SCHOLARS FOR ANIMAL PROTECTION$5,000
STOREFRONT ACADEMY HARLEM$5,000
TEAM DREAMERS FOUNDATION$5,000
THE HUNTER COLLEGE FOUNDATION$2,750
Individual grant recipient$2,500
STOREFRONT ACADEMY HARLEM$1,000
TEAM DREAMERS FOUNDATION$300
TEAM DREAMER LEGACY FOUNDATION$200
CHILDREN OF HEROES OF UKRAINE - GLOBAL GIVING$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $151k) land where the poverty rate runs at 21%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Children's Aid Society: $25k → 17%Children's Aid Society: $24k → 17%Children's Aid Society: $49k → 28%Childrens Aid Society: $38k → 17%Childrens Aid Society: $15k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$494k · 10 repeat orgs$73k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
7

Total granted

$494k
$40k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+52%

Still filing today

70%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 49% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $33k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
AnimalsFood & NutritionHuman ServicesEducationCommunity ImprovementArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    THE CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY
    5× · 2017–2023 · $151k · revenue +65%
  • TG
    THE GOOD FOOD INSTITUTE INC
    5× · 2019–2024 · $82k · revenue +30%
  • MF
    MERCY FOR ANIMALS INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $30k · revenue +106%

Funded once

  • IF
    INDEPENDENT FILMWORKS INC
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -327%
  • CW
    COMPASSION WITHOUT BORDERSgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +52%
  • HV
    Harlem Village Academies
    one grant, 2020 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Animal Outlook Inc

Animal outlook is a national animal protection organization working to end the abuse of farmed animals using a variety of strategies, including investigations, legal advocacy, corporate and food system reform, and vegan outreach.

Animals
2
A Just World

Our mission is to promote a world where all beings live a just life of dignity and respect. To this end, we engage in practical actions, raise funds, spread understanding and foster compassion.

Animals
3
Animal Agriculture Alliance

The animal agriculture alliance is a nonprofit organization that helps bridge the communication gap between farm and fork. we connect food industry stakeholders, engage food chain influencers and promote consumer choice by helping key…

Food & Nutrition
4
Better Food Foundation Inc

To promote dietary changes to build a healthy, equitable, humane, and environmentally-sustainable food system.

Food & Nutrition
5
Global Animal Partnership
Animals
6
Animal Wellness Action

To prevent cruelty to animals, we promote enacting and enforcing good public policies. enacting good laws depends upon electing good lawmakers, and we remind voters which candidates care about and support animal issues.

Human Services
7
The Food Alliance

Food alliance works at the juncture of science, business and values to define and promote sustainability in agriculture and the food industry, and to ensure safe and fair working conditions, humane treatment of animals, and careful…

Arts & Culture
8
Compassion in World Farming Inc

The Organization campaigns peacefully on a global level to end all cruel factory farming, specializing in farm animal welfare.

Human Services
9
Farm Forward Inc

To develop and implement strategies to promote more humane, sustainable, community-friendly food choices and advance animal agriculture with special attention to animal protection issues.

Animals
10
Global Food Partners Inc

Global food partners ("gfp") is an animal protection organization whose mission is to help food businesses meet their cage-free egg commitments and producers implement cage-free best practices.

Food & Nutrition
11
Foodshot Global Inc

Accelerate the transformation to a healthy, sustainable and equitable food system.

Food & Nutrition
12
Isf Advisors Inc

Isf advisors is the leading strategic and financial advisory group committed to mobilizing capital for a more sustainable, equitable, and productive global food system.

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mercy for Animals Inc; the most unlike its peers is Independent Filmworks Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $54,812 · OtherIndividual grant recipientThe Chamber Music Society: $40,125 · OtherThe Chamber Music SocietyIndividual grant recipient: $31,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCHILDREN OF HEROES OF UKRAINE - GLOBAL GIVING: $20,100 · OtherCHILDREN OF HEROES OF UKRAIN…THE CHILDRENS STOREFRONT: $14,000 · OtherTHE CHILDRENS STOREFRONTHarlem Village Academies: $6,000 · Other+5 more: $11,619 · Other+5 moreTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $137,125 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA …THE HUNTER COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $18,250 · EducationTHE HUNTER COLLEGE FOUNDA…THE CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY: $151,344 · Human ServicesTHE CHILDREN'S AID SOCIE…LEVER FOUNDATION INC: $56,000 · AnimalsLEVER FOUNDATION IN…MERCY FOR ANIMALS INC: $29,734 · AnimalsMERCY FOR ANIMALS I…Animal Equality: $17,500 · AnimalsAnimal EqualityCOMPASSION WITHOUT BORDERS: $10,000 · AnimalsCOMPASSION WITHOUT …Allied Scholars for Animal Protection: $5,000 · AnimalsTHE GOOD FOOD INSTITUTE INC: $81,609 · Food & NutritionTHE GOOD FOOD…A Well-Fed World: $5,000 · Food & NutritionA Well-Fed Wo…INDEPENDENT FILMWORKS INC: $10,000 · Arts & CultureGOOD CAUSES INC: $5,000 · Community Improvement
Other$177,656Education$155,375Human Services$151,344Animals$118,234Food & Nutrition$86,609Arts & Culture$10,000Community Improvement$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY: $151,344 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $137,125 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GOOD FOOD INSTITUTE INC: $81,609 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetLEVER FOUNDATION INC: $56,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetMERCY FOR ANIMALS INC: $29,734 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE HUNTER COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $18,250 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetAnimal Equality: $17,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE CHILDRENS STOREFRONT: $14,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetCOMPASSION WITHOUT BORDERS: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetGOOD CAUSES INC: $5,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetAllied Scholars for Animal Protection: $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetA Well-Fed World: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds THE GOOD FOOD INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds LEVER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MERCY FOR ANIMALS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HUNTER COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Animal Equality ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDRENS STOREFRONT ↗
  • Who funds INDEPENDENT FILMWORKS INC ↗
  • Who funds COMPASSION WITHOUT BORDERS ↗
  • Who funds GOOD CAUSES INC ↗
  • Who funds Allied Scholars for Animal Protection ↗
  • Who funds A Well-Fed World ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management IncNY11.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Suzanne Cohn Simon Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Suzanne Cohn Simon Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Suzanne Cohn Simon Family Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Suzanne Cohn Simon Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Suzanne Cohn Simon Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph