Skip to content
Sutter Bay Medical Foundation at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Sutter Bay Medical Foundation

Mission statement: mission: caring for our patients first and our people always.

$942k
Granted FY2024still arriving
22
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$360k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$18MHuman Services$671kEducation$431kFood & Nutrition$145kRecreation & Sports$135kYouth Development$124kHousing & Shelter$123kPhilanthropy$97kOther$0
02FY2024 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 22 grants below total $619,312, the rows itemized in this filing. The $942,106 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $322,794 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k16 grants · $120k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $75k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $64k
  • $250k+1 grant · $360k
$7,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.5B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SUTTER HEALTH$360,337
SUTTER BAY HOSPITALS$63,975
PENINSULA VOLUNTEERS INC$25,000
9 11 DAY$20,000
SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK SANTA CRUZ COUNTY$20,000
VOLUNTEER CENTER OF SANTA CRUZ$10,000
TAARIKA FOUNDATION$7,500
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA$7,500
NAT'L ALL ON MENTAL ILLNESS OF SANTA CRUZ CO$7,500
ADOLESCENT COUNSELING SERVICES$7,500
HEALTH CONNECTED$7,500
PALCARE INC$7,500
ABUNDANT GRACE COASTSIDE WORKER$7,500
ROOTS COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER$7,500
SAFESPACE CENTER INC$7,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $676k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 28% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%FAMILIES FIRST INC: $10k → 16%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $15k → 14%AVENIDAS: $35k → 8%SENIOR NETWORK SERVICES: $10k → 13%PALCARE INC: $8k → 7%AVENIDAS: $10k → 8%SENIOR NETWORK SERVICES: $10k → 13%PALCARE INC: $8k → 7%SENIOR NETWORK SERVICES: $10k → 13%PALCARE INC: $8k → 7%AVENIDAS: $10k → 8%SENIOR NETWORK SERVICES: $10k → 13%PALCARE INC: $8k → 7%SENIOR NETWORK SERVICES: $10k → 13%AVENIDAS: $10k → 8%SAFE ALTERNATIVES TO VIOLENT ENVIRONMENTS: $10k → 10%SAFE ALTERNATIVES TO VIOLENT ENVIRONMENTS: $10k → 10%MISSION HOSPICE AND HOME CARE: $10k → 7%MISSION HOSPICE AND HOME CARE: $8k → 7%PENINSULA JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $8k → 7%HEART OF HOPE ASIAN AMERICAN HOSPICE CARE: $8k → 8%ABUNDANT GRACE COASTSIDE WORKER: $10k → 7%AYUDANDO LATINOS A SONAR: $10k → 7%ABUNDANT GRACE COASTSIDE WORKER: $8k → 7%MAITRI: $18k → 8%STARVISTA: $10k → 7%MAITRI: $8k → 8%DEAF PLUS ADULT COMMUNITY: $8k → 10%NEXT DOOR SOLUTIONS TO DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $8k → 8%DEAF PLUS ADULT COMMUNITY: $8k → 10%ABUNDANT GRACE COASTSIDE WORKER: $8k → 7%NEXT DOOR SOLUTIONS TO DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $8k → 8%DEAF PLUS ADULT COMMUNITY: $8k → 10%PENINSULA VOLUNTEERS INC: $25k → 7%next door solutions to domestic violence: $8k → 8%FAMILY SERVICE AGENCY OF THE CENTRAL COAST: $24k → 13%FAMILY SERVICE AGENCY OF THE CENTRAL COAST: $16k → 13%WALNUT AVENUE FAMILY AND WOMENS CENTER: $10k → 13%YMCA OF SILICON VALLEY: $28k → 8%YMCA OF SILICON VALLEY: $28k → 8%YMCA OF SILICON VALLEY: $28k → 8%YMCA OF SILICON VALLEY DBA PALO ALTO FAMILY YMCA: $10k → 8%UPLIFT FAMILY SERVICES: $10k → 8%SUNNYVALE COMMUNITY SERVICES: $25k → 8%SUNNYVALE COMMUNITY SERVICES: $25k → 8%SUNNYVALE COMMUNITY SERVICES: $10k → 8%SUNNYVALE COMMUNITY SERVICES: $10k → 8%COMMUNITY SERVICES AGENCY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW AND LOS: $13k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$19M · 73 repeat orgs$964k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +60% since the first grant, against +20% for those funded once.

73 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2024, 55 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

73
39

Total granted

$19M
$909k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+60%
+20%

Still filing today

92%
85%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $55k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesEducationRecreation & SportsYouth DevelopmentHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SH
    SUTTER HEALTH
    5× · 2017–2024 · $8.1M · revenue +53%
  • SB
    SUTTER BAY HOSPITALS
    6× · 2017–2024 · $5.1M · revenue +84%
  • SC
    South County Community Health Center Inc dba Ravenswood Family Health Center
    4× · 2017–2020 · $1.3M · revenue +115%

Funded once

  • SH
    Soquel High School
    one grant, 2022 · $210k
  • SV
    SUTTER VALLEY HOSPITALSgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $180k · revenue +64%
  • PH
    PENINSULA HEALTHCARE CONNECTION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $75k · revenue +362%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sutter Bay Medical Foundation

Mission statement: mission: caring for our patients first and our people always. vision: to be the most comprehensive, integrated and connected health system for getting and staying well. values: excellence - we deliver high-quality,…

Health
2
Santa Cruz Community Health Centers

Our mission is to improve the health of our patients and the community and advocate the feminist goals of social, political, & economic equality.

Health
3
Asian Health Services

Asian Health Services (AHS) provides a continuum of medical care, mental health care, dental care and other healthcare services for all, including health education; perinatal services; behavioral health; family and youth services;…

Health
4
Marin Community Clinic

To improve the health of our patients and community by providing high quality, cost-effective, culturally sensitive, patient-centered health care.

Health
5
California Pacific Medical Center Foundation

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
6
Community Medical Centers Inc

The organization provides primary medical, behavior health, and dental care to the population of san joaquin, and solano counties without regard to patients' ability to pay.

Health
7
Tiburcio Vasquez Health Center Inc

Provide comprehensive community health services to southern Alameda County.

Health
8
Bay Area Community Services Housing Corp

Improve the quality of life for individuals in Alameda County, Contra Costa County, Solano County, Monterey County, Sacramento County and the surrounding area in the State of California.

Housing & Shelter
9
Asian and Pacific Islander Wellness Center Inc

Our core belief at San Francisco Community Health Center is that everyone deserves to be healthy and needs access to the highest quality health care. Our mission is to transform lives by advancing health, wellness and equality.

Health
10
Asian Pacific Health Care Venture Inc

Asian Pacific Health Care Venture, Inc. is a family of community health centers whose mission is to be the medical home for our patients by providing personalized, quality health care services in a culturally accessible manner.

—
11
Equity Health

Our mission is to ensure health care access to quality comprehensive health care services for persons who are medically needy or medically under-served and have traditionally experienced difficulty in getting care from traditional sources.

—
12
Health Projects Center

Health Projects Center supports people as they age to live safely at home by delivering high quality services and programs in the Monterey Bay Region.

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Health Trust; the most unlike its peers is Taarika Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

109 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 109 of the 118 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
32
Early backer (in before they grew)
106/109
Grantees still filing
88/109
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SUTTER HEALTH: $8,102,980 · HealthSUTTER HEALTHSUTTER BAY HOSPITALS: $5,099,497 · HealthSUTTER BAY HOSPITALSSouth County Community Health Center Inc dba Ravenswood Family Health Center: $1,310,000 · HealthSouth County Community Health Center Inc dba Ravenswood Family Health Center+33 more: $2,947,000 · Health+33 moreBAY AREA COMMUNITY HEALTH: $535,000 · OtherBAY AREA …Soquel High School: $210,000 · OtherSoquel Hi…MAYVIEW COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC: $200,000 · OtherMAYVIEW C…+35 more: $732,688 · Other+35 moreYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SILICON VALLEY: $92,500 · Human ServicesSUNNYVALE COMMUNITY SERVICES: $70,000 · Human ServicesAVENIDAS: $65,000 · Human ServicesNEXT DOOR SOLUTIONS TO DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $60,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY SERVICE AGENCY OF THE CENTRAL COAST: $54,375 · Human ServicesSENIOR NETWORK SERVICES INC: $50,000 · Human ServicesMAITRI: $40,000 · Human ServicesPENINSULA VOLUNTEERS INC: $31,000 · Human ServicesPALCARE INC: $30,000 · Human ServicesAbundant Grace Coastside Worker Inc: $25,000 · Human Services+14 more: $173,000 · Human ServicesCabrillo College Foundation: $67,500 · EducationHealth Connected: $65,000 · EducationSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC: $36,500 · EducationNEW HOPE CHINESE CANCER CARE FOUNDATION: $32,500 · EducationPRESIDENT-BOARD OF TRUSTEES SANTA CLARA COLLEGE: $20,000 · EducationBURLINGAME COMMUNITY FOR EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $20,000 · EducationRiekes Center for Human Enhancement: $16,750 · EducationLevantar: $16,500 · Education+2 more: $12,500 · EducationBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA: $70,000 · Youth DevelopmentTEEN KITCHEN PROJECT: $40,050 · Youth DevelopmentFoodWhat Incorporated: $32,500 · Youth DevelopmentYOUTH COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $24,000 · Youth DevelopmentBay Area Womens Sports Initiative: $76,000 · Recreation & SportsCALIFORNIA DRAGON BOAT ASSOCIATION: $12,000 · Recreation & SportsInclusion Matters by Shanes Inspiration: $10,000 · Recreation & SportsMAGICAL BRIDGE FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Recreation & SportsThe Silicon Valley Leadership Group Foundation: $46,000 · EnvironmentActerra Action for a Healthy Planet: $43,000 · Environment
Health$17,459,477Other$1,677,688Human Services$690,875Education$287,250Youth Development$166,550Recreation & Sports$108,000Environment$89,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSUTTER HEALTH: $8,102,980 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetSUTTER BAY HOSPITALS: $5,099,497 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetSouth County Community Health Center Inc dba Ravenswood Family Health Center: $1,310,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetBAY AREA COMMUNITY HEALTH: $535,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetTHE ASIAN AMERICANS FOR COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY INC: $450,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetAXIS COMMUNITY HEALTH INC: $450,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetHEALTHIER KIDS FOUNDATION: $400,000 over 4y, 3.1% of budgetINDIAN HEALTH CENTER OF SANTA CLARA VALLEY: $400,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetMAYVIEW COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC: $200,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetSUTTER VALLEY HOSPITALS: $180,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEALTH IMPROVEMENT PARTNERSHIP OF SANTA CRUZ COUNTY: $105,000 over 3y, 7.0% of budgetADOLESCENT COUNSELING SERVICES: $95,000 over 8y, 1.7% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SILICON VALLEY: $92,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBay Area Womens Sports Initiative: $76,000 over 6y, 3.8% of budgetPENINSULA HEALTHCARE CONNECTION INC: $75,000 over 1y, 5.4% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA: $70,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetSUNNYVALE COMMUNITY SERVICES: $70,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetCabrillo College Foundation: $67,500 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetAVENIDAS: $65,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetNAMI SANTA CRUZ COUNTY: $65,000 over 8y, 3.8% of budgetHealth Connected: $65,000 over 8y, 1.2% of budgetDOMINICAN HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $60,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetNEXT DOOR SOLUTIONS TO DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $60,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetSAFESPACE CENTER INC: $57,500 over 7y, 2.4% of budgetFAMILY SERVICE AGENCY OF THE CENTRAL COAST: $54,375 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetSENIOR NETWORK SERVICES INC: $50,000 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetGARDNER FAMILY HEALTH NETWORK INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCARDIAC THERAPY FOUNDATION OF THE MIDPENINSULA: $50,000 over 5y, 2.3% of budgetWEST VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY INC: $47,500 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetDIENTES COMMUNITY DENTAL CARE: $47,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCOASTAL KIDS HOME CARE: $47,500 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetCOMMON ROOTS FARM: $47,500 over 6y, 2.7% of budgetThe Silicon Valley Leadership Group Foundation: $46,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetCHILD ADVOCATES OF SILICON VALLEY INC: $45,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetActerra Action for a Healthy Planet: $43,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetTEEN KITCHEN PROJECT: $40,050 over 5y, 2.5% of budgetMAITRI: $40,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTAARIKA FOUNDATION: $40,000 over 5y, 40% of budgetTHE HEALTH TRUST: $40,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMental Health Association For Chinese Communities: $40,000 over 5y, 2.6% of budgetSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC: $36,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S HEALTH COUNCIL INC: $35,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCHAC FKA COMMUNITY HEALTH AWARENESS COUNCIL: $35,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetNEW HOPE CHINESE CANCER CARE FOUNDATION: $32,500 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetFoodWhat Incorporated: $32,500 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetPENINSULA VOLUNTEERS INC: $31,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetVOLUNTEER CENTERS OF SANTA CRUZ COUNTY: $30,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sutter Bay HospitalsKaiser Foundation Hos…The David and Lucile …The Sobrato Family Fo…Los Altos Mountain Vi…Silicon Valley Commun…Sunlight GivingGordon E and Betty I …Monterey Peninsula Fo…Sand Hill FoundationThe Palo Alto Communi…Philanthropic Venture…
Sutter Bay HospitalsCA75.3× affinity35 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sutter Bay Hospitals · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · The David and Lucile Packard Foundation · The Sobrato Family Foundation · Los Altos Mountain View Community Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Sunlight Giving · Gordon E and Betty I Moore Foundation · Monterey Peninsula Foundation · Sand Hill Foundation · The Palo Alto Community Fund · Philanthropic Ventures Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sutter Bay Medical Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sutter Bay Medical Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    57report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 118 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Sutter Bay Medical’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home