Skip to content
Sustainable Charitable Legacy Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

Sustainable Charitable Legacy Inc

Organizations mission is to support and carry out the purposes of its supported organization - HUMANITY PHILANTHROPIC FOUNDATION, INC.

$946k
Granted FY2025still arriving
22
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
04Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01FY2025 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $224k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $450k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$22,500
Median grant
10
States reached
$17M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA$250,000
ADVANCEMENT OF RURAL KIDS$200,000
CINCINNATI CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$100,000
CHABAD JEWISH CENTER$50,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MIGDAL OHR$50,000
KETER TORAH$50,000
KOLLEL OF ELIZABETH CONGREGATIONINC$45,000
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL$25,000
ROFEH CHOLER CANCER SOCIETY INC$25,000
FOUNDATION OF THE ASSOCIATION OF ENERGY ENGINEERS$25,000
VISION SPRINGS INC$22,500
ANTARA INTERNATIONAL$20,000
PROJECT PEARLS$20,000
UNION OF ORTHODOX JEWISH CONGREGATION OF AMERICA$11,250
LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY INC$10,000
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY25–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 85% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%AGASTYA USA: $10k → 8%AKSHARYA PATRA FOUNDATION USA: $9k → 10%CHILDREN'S HOPE INDIA: $5k → 6%ADVANCEMENT OF RURAL KIDS: $200k → 17%ROFEH CHOLER CANCER SOCIETY INC: $25k → 20%EKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA: $250k → 16%NATIONAL FRAGILE X FOUNDATIONINC: $10k → 14%FOUNDATION OF THE ASSOCIATION OF ENERGY ENGINEERS: $25k → 14%CINCINNATI CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $100k → 16%PROJECT EZRAH: $5k → 7%KOLLEL OF ELIZABETH CONGREGATIONINC: $45k → 10%OPERATION SMILE: $1k → 10%CHABAD JEWISH CENTER: $50k → 11%ANTARA INTERNATIONAL: $20k → 8%PROJECT PEARLS: $20k → 10%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MIGDAL OHR: $50k → 17%MAGIC BUS USA: $2k → 16%KETER TORAH: $50k → 7%UNION OF ORTHODOX JEWISH CONGREGATION OF AMERICA: $11k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
OH
NJ
CA
VA
MD
TN
DC
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Annapurna Global Foundation
Philanthropy
2
Intelehealth Inc

Intelehealth leverages open-source technology for Governments, NGOs and Hospitals to seamlessly connect 'hard to reach' populations with high quality primary healthcare. Health organizations all over the world have used our technology to…

International
3
Akhand Jyoti Usa

Eradicate cureable blindness, girls education, and women empowerment in the rural india

Health
4
Ananta Giving Foundation

To provide support for charitable and educational organizations and initiatives in the united states and abroad, including but not limited to organizations and initiatives focused on providing and facilitating access to high quality…

Philanthropy
5
Dakshana Foundation

The Foundation is a philanthropic foundation focused on alleviating poverty. It is focused on providing world-class educational opportunities to economically and socially disadvantaged gifted children from impoverished rural backgrounds in…

Education
6
Global Educ Campaign

Dosti sets up and manages schools in asian countries

Philanthropy
7
Armman-Usa

ARMMAN USA aims to support ARMMAN India directed towards reducing maternal, child, and neonatal mortality in India by providing financial support, technical support, and internships for professionals in India, forming volunteer groups, and…

International
8
Asha Partners

To eliminate poverty through the creation of sustainable and effective community development projects, and to create holistic transformation by bringing hope, empowerment, and healing to those with the greatest need.

Religion
9
Pratham Usa

PRATHAM USA'S PRIMARY OBJECTIVES ARE (i) raising funds to support learning, (ii) increasing awareness about the challenges facing students and equitable approaches to improving learning outcomes at scale, (CONTINUED ON SCHEDULE O)

Philanthropy
10
Indo-Us Foundation

The foundation provides medical grants and educational assistance to needy groups and organizations.

Human Services
11
Asset India Foundation

Facilitating international charitable donations to support urgent and high-impact needs in India, including healthcare, education, livelihoods, and social welfare, by enabling U.S. donors to give to vetted causes through Milaap.org.

International
12
Adara Development (Usa)

Our mission is to bridge the world of business and the world of people in extreme poverty, and to support vulnerable communities with health, education and other essential services

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Akshaya Patra Foundation (Usa); the most unlike its peers is Blood Cancer United Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
8/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ADVANCEMENT OF RURAL KIDS: $200,000 · OtherADVANCEMENT OF RURAL KIDSCINCINNATI CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $100,000 · OtherCINCINNATI CHILDREN'S HOSPITALKETER TORAH: $50,000 · OtherKETER TORAHCHABAD JEWISH CENTER: $50,000 · OtherCHABAD JEWISH CENTERKOLLEL OF ELIZABETH CONGREGATIONINC: $45,000 · OtherKOLLEL OF ELIZABETH CONGREGATIONINCFOUNDATION OF THE ASSOCIATION OF ENERGY ENGINEERS: $25,000 · OtherVISION SPRINGS INC: $22,500 · Other+2 more: $21,250 · OtherEKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA: $250,000 · InternationalEKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USAPROJECT PEARLS USA INC: $20,000 · InternationalPROJECT PEARLS USA INC+3 more: $8,000 · InternationalST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $25,000 · HealthANTARA INTERNATIONAL INC: $20,000 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $10,000 · HealthAmerican Friends of Migdal OHR: $50,000 · Youth DevelopmentROFEH CHOLIM CANCER SOCIETY INC: $25,000 · PhilanthropyAGASTYA USA: $10,000 · PhilanthropyProject Ezrah Needs Inc: $5,000 · PhilanthropyAKSHAYA PATRA FOUNDATION (USA): $9,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$513,750International$278,000Health$55,000Youth Development$50,000Philanthropy$40,000Food & Nutrition$9,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA: $250,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetFOUNDATION OF THE ASSOCIATION OF ENERGY ENGINEERS: $25,000 over 1y, 29% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAKSHAYA PATRA FOUNDATION (USA): $9,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOPERATION SMILE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global…American Online Givin…Paypal Charitable Giv…National Philanthropi…Vanguard Charitable E…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN12.1× affinity6 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sustainable Charitable Legacy Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sustainable Charitable Legacy Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Sustainable Charitable Legacy Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Sustainable Charitable Legacy Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Sustainable Charitable Legacy’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home