· Private foundation
Susan Kay Matthew Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2022–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k21 grants · $52k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CORAL RESTORATION FOUNDATION | $10,387 |
| NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING AND DEVELOPMENT | $5,338 |
| GRACE GAINESVILLE HOMELESS ORGANIZATION | $5,182 |
| GREAT SALT LAKE COLLABORATIVE | $5,113 |
| HAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| ST JOSEPHS INDIAN SCHOOL | $5,000 |
| MOTE MARINE LABORATORY - SARASOTA FL | $3,737 |
| ALIVE CHURCH | $2,310 |
| MID-FLORIDA HOMELESS COALITION INC | $2,098 |
| FOSTER CARE REVIEW | $2,058 |
| DAUGHTERS OF THE AMERICAN REVOLUTIONS - NSDAR FUND | $2,053 |
| FOSTER LOVE | $2,000 |
| GAINESVILLE COMMUNITY COUNSELING CENTER | $1,725 |
| TAMPA HILLSBOROUGH HOMELESS INITIATIVE | $1,575 |
| WOMEN IN DISTRESS OF BROWARD COUNTY | $1,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of -1% since the first grant, against -8% for the ones you funded once.
10 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 53% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $27k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TCTHE CORAL RESTORATION FOUNDATION INC2× · 2023–2024 · $21k · revenue +52%
- KHKIDS HURT TOO HAWAII2× · 2023–2024 · $2k · revenue +17%
- KCKULEANA CORAL REEFS2× · 2023–2024 · $2k · revenue +26%
Funded once
- GMGRACE MARKETPLACE (GAINESVILLE FLORIDA HOMELESS ORGANIZATION)one grant, 2023 · $5k
- SFSt Francis Houseone grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue -8%
- GMGRACE MARKETPLACEone grant, 2022 · $1k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The corporation is organized for the purpose of permanently reducing the number of homeless individuals and families in the central florida region.
To help people experiencing or at risk of homelessness build new lives through construction.
Hawaii island community development corporation was established on july 7, 1986, to provide families with low and moderate income with adequate housing and to acquire, construct and provide housing related activities.
The Coalition is to eliminate homelessness by providing education on homelessness issues, advocating for issues that help homeless people, networking with advocates throughout Florida, and promoting involvement
Family promise of hawai'i is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit dedicated to transforming the lives of families with children in hawaii facing homelessness by providing housing, resources, and support.
Habitat for Humanity of Collier County, Inc. is part of a global, nonprofit housing Organization operated on Christian principles that seeks to put God's love into action by building homes, communities and hope.
Providing caring, holistic substance abuse treatment to women and children with the goal of empowering families to live safe, independent and healthy lives.
Lead agency in the community for providers of homeless/prevention services in manatee/sarasota. responsible to plan strategies with community partners, assist with grants, educate the public, advocate with local leadership, administer the…
The florida housing coalition, inc., is a nonprofit, statewide membership organization whose mission is to bring together housing advocates and resources so that all floridians have a quality affordable home and suitable living…
To develop sustainable housing, finance new homebuyers, educate current and prospective homebuyers
Professional and accessible behavioral health counseling sensitive to the spiritual traditions of individuals, families, and communities in Hawaii, regardless of their ability to pay.
To improve the lives of those we touch by offering support, guidance and compassionate care of body, mind and spirit.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hawaii Community Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE CORAL RESTORATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Neighborhood Housing and Development Corporation ↗
- Who funds HAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds St Francis House ↗
- Who funds MID FLORIDA HOMELESS COALITION INC ↗
- Who funds KIDS HURT TOO HAWAII ↗
- Who funds FOSTER CARE REVIEW INC ↗
- Who funds NA KAMA KAI ↗
- Who funds PROJECT HAWAII INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL ALLIANCE ON MENTAL ILLNESS HAWAII ↗
- Who funds KULEANA CORAL REEFS ↗
- Who funds GAINESVILLE COMMUNITY COUNSELING CENTER ↗
- Who funds TAMPA HILLSBOROUGH HOMELESS INITIATIVE INC ↗
- Who funds WOMEN IN DISTRESS OF BROWARD COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Aloha United Way Inc · Network for Good · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Susan Kay Matthew Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Tampa Hillsborough Homeless Initiative Inc — 100% of income from government
- Foster Care Review Inc — 33% of income from government
- The Coral Restoration Foundation Inc — 16% of income from government
- Mid Florida Homeless Coalition Inc — 13% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Susan Kay Matthew Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Susan Kay Matthew Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.