Skip to content

· Private foundation

Susan and David Samrick Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$134k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$34k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$455kReligion$451kPhilanthropy$299kInternational$287kEducation$172kArts & Culture$60kHealth$3kOther$0
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $129k
$20,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HILLEL OF BROWARD AND PALM BEACH$33,500
JEWISH FEDERATION OF GRAND RAPIDS$28,731
AMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC$21,548
NOVA SOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY$20,000
JEWISH FEDERATION OF BROWARD COUNTY$15,000
CONGREGATION CHABAD HOUSE OF WESTERN MICHIGAN$10,000
CONGREGATION B'NAI ZION$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 37% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%JEWISH FEDERATION OF THE SACRAMENTO REGION: $10k → 12%METZAD CONGREGATION: $10k → 14%AMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $85k → 14%HILLEL OF BROWARD AND PALM BEACH: $34k → 11%JEWISH FEDERATION OF GRAND RAPIDS: $44k → 11%METZAD CONGREGATION: $10k → 14%AMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $85k → 14%HILLEL OF BROWARD & PALM BEACH: $18k → 11%JEWISH FEDERATION OF GRAND RAPIDS: $31k → 11%AMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $85k → 14%HILLEL OF BROWARD & PALM BEACH: $16k → 11%CHABAD OF SUNRISE: $5k → 13%JEWISH FEDERATION OF GRAND RAPIDS: $25k → 11%AMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $22k → 14%HILLEL OF BROWARD AND PALM BEACH: $15k → 11%CHABAD OF SUNRISE: $5k → 13%CHABAD OF WESTERN MICHIGAN: $104k → 11%HILLEL OF BROWARD & PALM BEACH: $15k → 11%NOVA SOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY: $20k → 13%CHABAD OF WESTERN MICHIGAN: $72k → 11%HILLEL OF BROWARD & PALM BEACH: $13k → 11%CONGREGATION B'NAI ZION: $5k → 13%CHABAD OF WESTERN MICHIGAN: $45k → 11%HILLEL OF BROWARD AND PALM BEACH: $10k → 11%JEWISH FEDERATION OF GRAND RAPIDS: $35k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF BROWARD COUNTY: $14k → 13%CONGREGATION CHABAD HOUSE OF WESTERN MICHIGAN: $31k → 11%JEWISH FEDERATION OF GRAND RAPIDS: $29k → 11%NOVA SOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY MUSEUM OF ART: $20k → 13%DA BLODGETT - ST JOHN'S: $350k → 11%B'NAI AVIV: $8k → 13%JEWISH FEDERATION OF GRAND RAPIDS: $12k → 11%NOVA SOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY: $20k → 13%DA BLODGETT - ST JOHN'S: $85k → 11%B'NAI AVIV: $8k → 13%CONGREGATION CHABAD HOUSE OF WESTERN MICHIGAN: $10k → 11%NOVA SOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY MUSEUM OF ART: $15k → 13%DA BLODGETT-ST JOHNS: $5k → 11%B'NAI AVIV: $8k → 13%NOVA SOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY MUSEUM OF ART: $15k → 13%B'NAI AVIV: $8k → 13%NOVA SOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY MUSEUM OF ART: $10k → 13%UNITED JEWISH COMMUNITY OF BROWARD COUNTY: $30k → 13%JEWISH FEDERATION OF BROWARD COUNTY: $22k → 13%JEWISH FEDERATION OF BROWARD COUNTY: $18k → 13%JEWISH FEDERATION OF BROWARD COUNTY: $18k → 13%JEWISH FEDERATION OF BROWARD COUNTY: $15k → 13%UNITED JEWISH COMMUNITY OF BROWARD COUNTY: $10k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 14 repeat orgs$146k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
7

Total granted

$1.4M
$146k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
+36%

Still filing today

29%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DB
    DA BLODGETT - ST JOHN'S
    3× · 2017–2023 · $440k · revenue -30%
  • AI
    AMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2017–2024 · $277k · revenue -6%
  • CO
    CHABAD OF WESTERN MICHIGAN
    4× · 2017–2021 · $222k

Funded once

  • UO
    University of Miamigraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $125k · revenue +67%
  • FF
    Foundation for the Defense of Democracies Incgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +36%
  • HA
    HARMEL ACADEMY OF THE TRADES
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue -11%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
2
Hebrew College

Promotes excellence in jewish learning & leadership within a pluralistic environment. see sch ohebrew college promotes excellence in jewish learning and leadership within a pluralistic environment of open inquiry, intellectual rigor,…

Education
3
Jerusalem University College

Jerusalem University College creates opportunities for students to deepen their knowledge of God and His Word through immersive study of the ancient and modern contexts of Israel and the surrounding regions, equipping them for academia,…

International
4
University of Southern California Hillel Foundation

To create an informed, celebratory and satisfying jewish community for students at the university of southern california, to deepen jewish identity through social, intellectual and spiritual participation, to offer diversified…

—
5
University of Judaism Foundation
—
6
San Diego Jewish Academy

San Diego Jewish Academy empowers each student to learn for life, guided by Jewish values and rooted in strength of community.

Education
7
The Academy for Jewish Religion

The academy for jewish religion serves the needs of the jewish people by ordaining rabbis and cantors and training leaders. we affirm our commitment to a vibrant and inclusive jewish pluralism; to an interweaving of sacred texts, critical…

—
8
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
9
Hebrew University of Jerusalem

To promote, encourage, aid and advance higher and secondary education, research and training in all branches of knowledge. as the standard bearer of excellence, the university strives to ensure and foster outstanding achievements in all…

Education
10
Jewish Electorate Institute

The jewish electorate institute (jei) is an independent, non-partisan 501(c)(3) organization that surveys, interprets, reports, and educates the public about the perspectives, voting behaviors, and motivations of the american jewish…

Civil Rights
11
Atlanta Jewish Academy Inc

Atlanta jewish academy is a college preparatory, co-educational, preschool-12th grade, independent jewish day school, guided by modern orthodox values and principles. we embody the ideals of community, tradition, individual development and…

Education
12
Bureau of Jewish Education of Greater Buffalo Inc

Education opportunity for the jewish community

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Jewish Community of Broward County Inc; the most unlike its peers is University of Miami. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
5/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DA BLODGETT - ST JOHN'S: $439,788 · OtherDA BLODGETT - ST JOHN'SCHABAD OF WESTERN MICHIGAN: $222,000 · OtherCHABAD OF WESTERN MICHIGANJEWISH FEDERATION OF GRAND RAPIDS: $175,531 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATION OF GRAND RAPIDSHILLEL OF BROWARD AND PALM BEACH INC: $119,500 · OtherHILLEL OF BROWARD AND PALM BEACH INCJEWISH FEDERATION OF BROWARD COUNTY: $73,000 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATION OF BROWARD COUNTYNOVA SOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY MUSEUM OF ART: $59,800 · Other+11 more: $133,360 · Other+11 moreAMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $276,548 · InternationalAMERICAN ISRAEL ED…Foundation for the Defense of Democracies Inc: $10,000 · InternationalUniversity of Miami: $125,000 · EducationUniversity …Nova Southeastern University Inc: $40,000 · EducationNova Southe…+1 more: $5,000 · EducationUNITED JEWISH COMMUNITY OF BROWARD COUNTY INC: $40,000 · PhilanthropyJewish Federation of the Sacra: $10,000 · Philanthropy
Other$1,222,979International$286,548Education$170,000Philanthropy$50,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDA BLODGETT - ST JOHN'S: $439,788 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetAMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $276,548 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF GRAND RAPIDS: $175,531 over 6y, 7.1% of budgetUniversity of Miami: $125,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHILLEL OF BROWARD AND PALM BEACH INC: $119,500 over 7y, 1.2% of budgetUNITED JEWISH COMMUNITY OF BROWARD COUNTY INC: $40,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNova Southeastern University Inc: $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFoundation for the Defense of Democracies Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJewish Federation of the Sacra: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetHARMEL ACADEMY OF THE TRADES: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DA BLODGETT - ST JOHN'S ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF GRAND RAPIDS ↗
  • Who funds University of Miami ↗
  • Who funds HILLEL OF BROWARD AND PALM BEACH INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED JEWISH COMMUNITY OF BROWARD COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds Nova Southeastern University Inc ↗
  • Who funds Foundation for the Defense of Democracies Inc ↗
  • Who funds Jewish Federation of the Sacra ↗
  • Who funds HARMEL ACADEMY OF THE TRADES ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Renaissance Charitable Foundation IncIN12.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Susan and David Samrick Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Susan and David Samrick Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • University of Miami: 5% of income from government
  • Nova Southeastern University Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Susan and David Samrick Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph