Skip to content

· Private foundation

Sunrise Foundation for Education and the Arts

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.1M
Granted FY2024still arriving
18
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$5.0M
02FY2024 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $235k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $562k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$33,389
Median grant
4
States reached
$2.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
The Metropolitan Opera Association Inc$250,000
Klezmer by Alicia Svigals LLC$122,000
Individual grant recipient$110,226
Individual grant recipient$103,200
Individual grant recipient$90,220
San Francisco Silent Film Festival$75,000
Individual grant recipient$60,919
Individual grant recipient$49,213
Individual grant recipient$33,389
San Francisco Silent Film Festival$33,333
Friends of the VATMF$30,500
Jewish Community of Helsinki$24,824
Jewish Community of Helsinki$24,540
Blackhawk Films Inc$20,000
National Center for Jewish Film Inc$19,557
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 53% of grant dollars ($2.7M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 47% that went abroad ($2.3M) is mapped below.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 67% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%National Center for Jewish Film Inc: $20k → 7%National Film Preserve Ltd: $250k → 10%San Francisco Silent Film Festival: $75k → 10%Yiddish Arts Academics Assoc of N A: $5k → 11%Friends of The Cineteca di Bologna: $10k → 14%The Metropolitan Opera: $258k → 17%Le Giornate del Cinema Muto: $48k → 15%Donald Sosin: $103k → 9%Heart Mountain Wyoming Foundation: $250k → 11%REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFO: $127k → 10%San Francisco Silent Film Festival: $73k → 10%University of California San Diego: $33k → 11%Friends of Cineteca di Bologna: $10k → 14%Klezmer by Alicia Svigals LLC: $122k → 17%REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFO: $118k → 10%San Francisco Silent Film Festival: $50k → 10%San Diego Opera: $10k → 11%Friends of the VATMF: $31k → 14%The Metropolitan Opera Association Inc: $250k → 17%National Film Preserve Ltd: $9k → 10%San Francisco Silent Film Festival: $41k → 10%Friends of the VATMF: $4k → 14%Jewish Creativity International: $5k → 17%Telluride Film Festival: $9k → 10%San Francisco Silent Film Festival: $33k → 10%Blackhawk Films Inc: $142k → 14%The Metropolitan Opera: $50k → 17%Telluride Film Festival: $9k → 10%San Francisco Silent Film Festival: $33k → 10%Blackhawk Films Inc: $20k → 14%Dept of German at Univ of CA Berkel: $105k → 10%San Francisco Silent Film Festival: $25k → 10%Filmforum Inc: $47k → 14%Dept of German at Univ of CA Berkel: $55k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Beyond the US: 47% of all-years giving ($2.3M)

5 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Germany$1.1M · 17 grants
Austria$888k · 2 grants
Finland$277k · 6 grants
Italy$48k · 1 grant
Netherlands$14k · 1 grant
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

64%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.2M · 12 repeat orgs$1.8M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +41% since the first grant, against +10% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
11

Total granted

$3.2M
$1.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+10%

Still filing today

17%
27%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 60% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $426k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    5× · 2020–2024 · $821k
  • SF
    San Francisco Silent Film Festival
    4× · 2020–2024 · $331k
  • TM
    The Metropolitan Opera
    2× · 2020–2023 · $308k

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $888k
  • HM
    HEART MOUNTAIN WYOMING FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $250k · revenue -60%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $61k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
5/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $887,508 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $820,762 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSan Francisco Silent Film Festival: $331,106 · OtherSan Francisco Silent Film FestivalThe Metropolitan Opera: $307,900 · OtherThe Metropolitan OperaJewish Community of Helsinki: $277,003 · OtherJewish Community of HelsinkiREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFO: $245,000 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFOIndividual grant recipient: $241,700 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $202,491 · OtherBlackhawk Films Inc: $161,570 · OtherDept of German at Univ of CA Berkel: $160,000 · OtherKlezmer by Alicia SvigalsLLC: $140,500 · Other+9 more: $324,170 · Other+9 moreThe National Film Preserve Ltd: $277,150 · Arts & CultureThe National Film P…Metropolitan Opera Association Inc: $250,000 · Arts & CultureMetropolitan Opera …HEART MOUNTAIN WYOMING FOUNDATION: $250,000 · Arts & CultureHEART MOUNTAIN WYOM…FILMFORUM INC: $47,250 · Arts & CultureFILMFORUM INC+2 more: $29,557 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF CINETECA DI BOLOGNA: $20,000 · International
Other$4,099,710Arts & Culture$853,957International$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe National Film Preserve Ltd: $277,150 over 3y, 2.7% of budgetMetropolitan Opera Association Inc: $250,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHEART MOUNTAIN WYOMING FOUNDATION: $250,000 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetFILMFORUM INC: $47,250 over 1y, 19% of budgetFRIENDS OF CINETECA DI BOLOGNA: $20,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetNATIONAL CENTER FOR JEWISH FILMINC: $19,557 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetSan Diego Opera Association: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The National Film Preserve Ltd ↗
  • Who funds Metropolitan Opera Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds HEART MOUNTAIN WYOMING FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FILMFORUM INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF CINETECA DI BOLOGNA ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL CENTER FOR JEWISH FILMINC ↗
  • Who funds San Diego Opera Association ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

California Community FoundationCA12.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sunrise Foundation for Education and the Arts funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sunrise Foundation for Education and the Arts. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • National Center for Jewish Filminc: 4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Sunrise Foundation for Education and the Arts?

Find your warmest path to Sunrise Foundation for Education and the Arts through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Sunrise Foundation for Education and the Arts’ filings →

More from the funding graph