Skip to content

· Private foundation

Sunnen Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.4M
Granted FY2025still arriving
30
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$336k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$3.0MHealth$2.7MFood & Nutrition$386kEducation$166kCrime & Legal$125kEmployment$125kRecreation & Sports$98kReligion$58kOther$0
02FY2025 · 30 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $39k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $119k
  • $50k–250k8 grants · $941k
  • $250k+1 grant · $336k
$10,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$15M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YMCA OF THE OZARKS$336,026
OPERATION FOOD SEARCH$230,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF ST LOUIS$225,000
L'ARCHE ST LOUIS$135,000
HOME SWEET HOME$100,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD - SOUTHEAST$80,056
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTHERN NEW ENGLAND$70,000
RANKEN JORDAN$51,000
CASA OF ST LOUIS$50,000
BCI INC$24,000
KIDS IN THE MIDDLE$20,000
READY READERS$15,000
SHERWOOD FOREST$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
WILD BIRD REHABILITATION$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $804k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%EARTH SANGHA: $5k → 6%EARTH SANGHA: $5k → 6%EARTH SANGHA: $3k → 6%NURSES FOR NEWBORNS: $10k → 11%NURSES FOR NEWBORNS: $7k → 11%FRIENDS OF KIDS WITH CANCER: $5k → 11%FRIENDS OF KIDS WITH CANCER: $5k → 11%FRIENDS OF KIDS WITH CANCER: $5k → 11%FRIENDS OF KIDS WITH CANCER: $5k → 11%FRIENDS OF KIDS WITH CANCER: $5k → 11%HOME SWEET HOME: $100k → 11%HOME SWEET HOME: $30k → 11%HOME SWEET HOME: $25k → 11%HOME SWEET HOME: $25k → 11%GATEWAY REGION YMCA: $250k → 21%LITTLE BIT FOUNDATION: $10k → 21%LITTLE BIT FOUNDATION: $10k → 21%HOME SWEET HOME: $20k → 11%LITTLE BIT FOUNDATION: $10k → 21%LITTLE BIT FOUNDATION: $5k → 21%LITTLE BIT FOUNDATION: $5k → 21%LITTLE BIT FOUNDATION: $5k → 21%LITTLE BIT FOUNDATION: $2k → 21%ST LOUIS LEARNING DISABILITIES ASSOCIATION: $10k → 11%ST LOUIS LEARNING DISABILITIES ASSOCIATION: $10k → 11%ST LOUIS LEARNING DISABILITIES ASSOCIATION: $8k → 11%ST LOUIS LEARNING DISABILITIES ASSOCIATION: $5k → 11%ST LOUIS LEARNING DISABILITIES ASSOCIATION: $5k → 11%ST LOUIS LEARNING DISABILITIES ASSOCIATION: $5k → 11%PROMISE COMMUNITY HOMES (RAINBOW VILLAGE): $55k → 11%PROMISE COMMUNITY HOMES (RAINBOW VILLAGE): $50k → 11%PROMISE COMMUNITY HOMES (RAINBOW VILLAGE): $45k → 11%PROMISE COMMUNITY HOMES (RAINBOW VILLAGE): $25k → 11%HAVEN HOUSE: $25k → 11%RAINBOW VILLAGE: $10k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
PA
CT
CA
MO
VA
AZ
TN
NC
AL
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$7.8M · 35 repeat orgs$435k to everyone else

35 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

35
24

Total granted

$7.8M
$401k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+48%

Still filing today

74%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $34k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthArts & CultureFood & NutritionCivil RightsRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OF
    OPERATION FOOD SEARCH INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $613k · revenue +13%
  • PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTHERN NEW ENGLAND INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $393k · revenue +26%
  • TR
    The Ranken-Jordan Home For Convalescent Crippled Children
    7× · 2019–2025 · $335k · revenue +65%

Funded once

  • GR
    GATEWAY REGION YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2022 · $250k · revenue +10%
  • RT
    Ranken Technical Collegegraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $28k · revenue +30%
  • HH
    HAVEN HOUSE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $25k · revenue +55%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Arbor Research Collaborative for Health

Arbor research collaborative for health is committed to improving patient care through research that shapes medical policies and practice. in particular, arbor research conducts health outcomes research on chronic disease and end-stage…

Health
2
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
3
Eastern National

Eastern national promotes the public's understanding and support of america's national parks and other public trust partners by providing quality educational experiences, products and services.

Recreation & Sports
4
Food & Water Watch

Food & water watch conducts extensive research and public education to ensure the food and water we consume is safe, accessible and sustainably produced. so we can all enjoy and trust in what we eat and drink, we help people take charge of…

Food & Nutrition
5
Population Connection

Overpopulation threatens the quality of life for people everywhere. population connection is the national grassroots population organization that educates young people and advocates progressive action to stabilize world population at a…

Social Science
6
The Riverwoods Group

The mission of the riverwoods group (trwg) is to plan, coordinate, implement & further the missions of the riverwoods company at exeter new hampshire (rwe), birch hill terrace (bh) dba riverwoods manchester (rwm), riverwoods durham (rwd),…

Human Services
7
United Children's Services of Bennington County Inc

Children's services

Human Services
8
Lincoln Children's Museum

The lincoln children's museum invites children to create, discover and learn through the power of play.

Arts & Culture
9
Homeward Bound Inc

Providing innovative and life-enriching services for children, adolescents, and adults with disabilities.

Human Services
10
The Saint Louis Zoo Association

The saint louis zoo association was established to support and enhance the saint louis zoo by providing facilities, funds, and advice. the association provides direct financial support to the zoo for renovations, new facilities, programs,…

Animals
11
Path

Path makes good health more accessible in 70+ countries by improving the health care people receive, creating affordable health products, and advancing effective health policies.

International
12
People Inc

People inc. provides health and human services that enrich lives and communities through innovation and supportive services. with a goal to help people achieve greater independence and quality of life, people inc. provides day,…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kids in the Middle Inc; the most unlike its peers is Earth Sangha. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

43 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 43 of the 69 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
42/43
Grantees still filing
31/43
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

YMCA OF THE OZARKS: $2,569,801 · OtherYMCA OF THE OZARKSPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF ST LOUIS: $1,680,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF ST LOUISPLANNED PARENTHOOD - SOUTHEAST: $582,706 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD - SOUTHEAST+43 more: $660,317 · Other+43 morePLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTHERN NEW ENGLAND INC: $392,500 · HealthPLANNED PAREN…The Ranken-Jordan Home For Convalescent Crippled Children: $335,155 · HealthThe Ranken-Jo…LARCHE ST LOUIS: $235,000 · HealthLARCHE ST LOU…+4 more: $38,500 · HealthGATEWAY REGION YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $250,000 · Human ServicesGATEWAY REG…HOME SWEET HOME: $200,000 · Human ServicesHOME SWEET …RAINBOW VILLAGE INC: $185,000 · Human ServicesRAINBOW VIL…THE LITTLE BIT FOUNDATION: $47,000 · Human ServicesTHE LITTLE …ST LOUIS LEARNING DISABILITIES ASSOCIATION: $42,500 · Human Services+4 more: $79,600 · Human Services+4 moreOPERATION FOOD SEARCH INC: $613,000 · Food & Nutrition+1 more: $1,000 · Food & NutritionCASA OF ST LOUIS: $175,000 · Civil Rights+1 more: $500 · Civil RightsREADY READERS: $50,000 · EducationRanken Technical College: $27,540 · EducationPROJECT CU INC: $61,000 · Employment
Other$5,492,824Health$1,001,155Human Services$804,100Food & Nutrition$614,000Civil Rights$175,500Education$77,540Employment$61,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOPERATION FOOD SEARCH INC: $613,000 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTHERN NEW ENGLAND INC: $392,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetThe Ranken-Jordan Home For Convalescent Crippled Children: $335,155 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetGATEWAY REGION YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $250,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetLARCHE ST LOUIS: $235,000 over 4y, 2.7% of budgetHOME SWEET HOME: $200,000 over 5y, 2.4% of budgetRAINBOW VILLAGE INC: $185,000 over 5y, 17% of budgetCASA OF ST LOUIS: $175,000 over 9y, 2.2% of budgetKIDS IN THE MIDDLE INC: $120,000 over 9y, 1.9% of budgetFOURCHE VALLEY CHARITABLE TRUST: $74,500 over 3y, 21% of budgetPROJECT CU INC: $61,000 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetHOPE IGNITES ST LOUIS: $61,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetREADY READERS: $50,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetWILD BIRD REHABILITATION INC: $50,000 over 9y, 2.7% of budgetTHE LITTLE BIT FOUNDATION: $47,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetST LOUIS LEARNING DISABILITIES ASSOCIATION: $42,500 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetSHERWOOD FOREST CAMP INC: $35,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetRanken Technical College: $27,540 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF KIDS WITH CANCER: $25,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICAN INSTITUTE FOR RESPIRATORY EQUITY: $25,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetHAVEN HOUSE INC: $25,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetCAMP RAINBOW FOUNDATION: $23,000 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetNURSES FOR NEWBORNS: $17,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetEarth Sangha: $12,600 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetPrecept: $10,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRIVERFRONT RECAPTURE INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBLUE RIDGE PRISM INC: $7,400 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHEATERWORKS INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCLOVERLEAF EQUINE CENTER: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetWEST HILL POND ASSOCIATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetBURNS RECOVERED SUPPORT GROUP INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetBALLROOM BASIX USA INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetNATIONAL CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION INC: $2,600 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCONNECTICUT AERONAUTICAL HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDYSAUTONOMIA INTERNATIONAL INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFeeding America: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIndependence Seaport Museum: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTREVOR PROJECT INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds OPERATION FOOD SEARCH INC ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTHERN NEW ENGLAND INC ↗
  • Who funds The Ranken-Jordan Home For Convalescent Crippled Children ↗
  • Who funds GATEWAY REGION YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds LARCHE ST LOUIS ↗
  • Who funds HOME SWEET HOME ↗
  • Who funds RAINBOW VILLAGE INC ↗
  • Who funds CASA OF ST LOUIS ↗
  • Who funds KIDS IN THE MIDDLE INC ↗
  • Who funds FOURCHE VALLEY CHARITABLE TRUST ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT CU INC ↗
  • Who funds HOPE IGNITES ST LOUIS ↗
  • Who funds READY READERS ↗
  • Who funds WILD BIRD REHABILITATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE LITTLE BIT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ST LOUIS LEARNING DISABILITIES ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds SHERWOOD FOREST CAMP INC ↗
  • Who funds Ranken Technical College ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF KIDS WITH CANCER ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN INSTITUTE FOR RESPIRATORY EQUITY ↗
  • Who funds HAVEN HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds CAMP RAINBOW FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NURSES FOR NEWBORNS ↗
  • Who funds Earth Sangha ↗
  • Who funds Precept ↗
  • Who funds RIVERFRONT RECAPTURE INC ↗
  • Who funds MIO Frontiers ↗
  • Who funds BLUE RIDGE PRISM INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

St Louis Community Foundation IncMO35.8× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: St Louis Community Foundation Inc · The William R Orthwein Jr and Laura Rand Orthwein Foundation Inc · Clifford Willard Gaylord Foundation · United Way of Greater St Louis Inc · Employees Community Fund of the Boeing Company · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · Pott Foundation · Brown Dana Charitable Trust · St Louis Community Foundation · World Wide Technology Foundation · Jordan Mary R & Ettie a Charitable · Pershing Charitable Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sunnen Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sunnen Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • Planned Parenthood of Southern New England Inc: 10% of income from government
  • Theaterworks Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Riverfront Recapture Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
15report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Sunnen Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Sunnen Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 69 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Sunnen’s filings →

More from the funding graph