· Public charity
Summa Health Group Return
Summa health's mission is to provide the highest quality, compassionate care to patients and members and contribute to a healthier community.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SUMMA HEALTH | $393,242 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–22, $378k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +33% since the first grant, against +1% for the ones you funded once.
15 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SHSumma Health4× · 2021–2024 · $23M · revenue +8%
- YMYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF AKRON INC4× · 2018–2022 · $320k · revenue +9%
- AHAmerican Heart Association Inc6× · 2017–2022 · $185k · revenue +33%
Funded once
- ARAKRON-CANTON REGIONAL FOODBANKone grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue +1%
- LALOVE AKRON INCone grant, 2021 · $14k · revenue -40%
- KSKENT STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONone grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +5%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.
To develop charitable gifts and resources dedicated to building healthier communities in southwest ohio.
Provide exceptional, integrated, patient-centered health care services designed to meet the needs of all patients, particularly those who experience barriers to accessing care, regardless of their ability to pay.
Kane community hospital foundation supports the people of upmc kane and their communities by providing access to financial resources to be used towards education and services aimed to enhance health and wellness within our region
Arbor research collaborative for health is committed to improving patient care through research that shapes medical policies and practice. in particular, arbor research conducts health outcomes research on chronic disease and end-stage…
We exist to serve our patients with compassionate health care of the highest quality.
To provide compassionate, exceptional and highly reliable care.
To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustful environment through the expertise, committment, and compassion of our family of caregivers.
To support salem health, salem health west valley and related organizations.
To improve, maintain and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.
The columbus medical association foundation, through the governance and oversight of its board of physicians and other experts, effects change within specific priority areas to improve the health and wellbeing of the residents and…
The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Akron Community Service Center & Urban League Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Stephen a Comunale Jr Charitable Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Summa Health ↗
- Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF AKRON INC ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds THE WELL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds AKRON COMMUNITY SERVICE CENTER & URBAN LEAGUE INC ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF SUMMIT COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds STEWART'S CARING PLACE INC AND SUBSIDIARY ↗
- Who funds THE STEPHEN A COMUNALE JR CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds AKRON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds AKRON PARKS COLLABORATIVE ↗
- Who funds AKRON-CANTON REGIONAL FOODBANK ↗
- Who funds SUMMIT COUNTY MEDICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds LOVE AKRON INC ↗
- Who funds KENT STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds OPPORTUNITY PARISH ECUMENICAL NEIGHBORHOOD MINISTRY ↗
- Who funds GUYS & GALS COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds THE BARBERTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds EPILEPSY ASSOCIATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Akron Community Foundation · Mary S & David C Corbin Foundation · United Way of Summit and Medina · Tuscora Park Health & Wellness Foundation · The Welty Family Foundation · Gar Foundation · Sisler McFawn Foundation Pfdn · The Cleveland Clinic Foundation Group Return · John S and James L Knight Foundation · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · Summa Health · The Huntington-Akron Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Summa Health Group Return funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.