Skip to content
Sue Ling Gin Foundation Trust at a glance

· Private foundation

Sue Ling Gin Foundation Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$34M
Granted FY2025still arriving
24
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$10M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Community Improvement$21MPhilanthropy$17MArts & Culture$11MEmployment$5.3MEducation$3.2MHealth$1.9MCrime & Legal$1.0MInternational$55kOther$0
02FY2025 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $28k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $105k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $310k
  • $250k+11 grants · $34M
$160,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$58M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMMERCIAL CLUB FOUNDATION$10,000,000
CHICAGO CRED INC$7,000,000
THE FIELD MUSEUM$5,200,000
CARA COLLECTIVE$5,000,000
DEPAUL UNIVERSITY$3,000,000
UNIV OF CHICAGO CRIME LAB$1,000,000
RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER$958,086
CHINESE AMERICAN SERVICE LEAGUE$550,000
RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER$500,000
RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER$400,000
GREATER JAMAICA DEVELOPMENT CORP$305,000
UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO$160,000
AUTOMOTIVE MENTORING GROUP$150,000
MIDWEST GLOBAL ALLIANCE$25,000
BRAIN RESEARCH FOUNDATION$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%TEA THE ENTREPRENEAUR ACADEMY: $5k → 11%GREATER JAMAICA DEVELOPMENT CORP: $305k → 13%NORTH AMERICAN WORD GAME PLAYERS ASSOCIATION: $10k → 14%INTERNATIONAL FLIGHT SERVICES ASSOCIATION FOUNDATION: $45k → 13%PEACETREES VIETNAM: $20k → 9%THE FIELD MUSEUM: $5.2M → 14%ONE TREE PLANTED: $6k → 10%international flight services association foundation: $31k → 13%PEACETREES VIETNAM: $10k → 9%THE FIELD MUSEUM: $5.0M → 14%SAN DIEGO CHINESE HISTORICAL SOCIETY AND MUSEUM: $10k → 11%INTERNATIONAL FLIGHT SERVICES ASSOCIATION FOUNDATION: $26k → 13%THE FIELD MUSEUM: $125k → 14%the field museum: $30k → 14%THE FIELD MUSEUM: $30k → 14%BRAIN RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $25k → 14%COMMERCIAL CLUB FOUNDATION: $10.0M → 14%LYCEE FRANCAIS DE CHICAGO: $23k → 14%COMMERCIAL CLUB FOUNDATION: $3.0M → 14%WTTW - WINDOW TO THE WORLD COMMUNICATIONS INC: $200k → 14%CHINESE AMERICAN SERVICE LEAGUE: $550k → 14%CHINESE AMERICAN SERVICE LEAGUE: $50k → 14%CHINESE AMERICAN SERVICE LEAGUE: $48k → 14%CHINESE AMERICAN SERVICE LEAGUE: $25k → 14%AUTOMOTIVE MENTORING GROUP: $150k → 14%CHINESE AMERICAN SERVICE LEAGUE: $24k → 14%AUTOMOTIVE MENTORING GROUP: $150k → 14%NAVY PIER INC: $25k → 14%NAVY PIER INC: $25k → 14%CARA COLLECTIVE: $5.0M → 14%RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER: $958k → 14%RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER: $500k → 14%RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER: $400k → 14%UNIV OF CHICAGO CRIME LAB: $1.0M → 14%THE NATIONAL MUSEUM OF MEXICAN ART: $5k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $160k → 14%MIDWEST GLOBAL ALLIANCE: $25k → 14%MEALS ON WHEELS CHICAGO: $5k → 14%MUSIC INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $5k → 14%DEPAUL UNIVERSITY: $3.0M → 14%CHICAGO CRED INC: $7.0M → 14%CHICAGO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $4.5M → 14%CHICAGO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $4.5M → 14%CHICAGO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $4.0M → 14%CHICAGO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $2.9M → 14%CHICAGO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1.4M → 14%CHICAGO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $90k → 14%FRIENDS OF ALZHEIMER'S CHICAGO: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$42M · 9 repeat orgs$19M to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
5

Total granted

$42M
$225k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+13%

Still filing today

89%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 46% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $18M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationEmploymentYouth DevelopmentCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CA
    CHINESE AMERICAN SERVICE LEAGUE INC
    6× · 2017–2025 · $700k · revenue +87%
  • PV
    PEACETREES VIETNAM
    2× · 2022–2025 · $30k · revenue +45%
  • LF
    Lycee Francais de Chicago Inc
    2× · 2024–2025 · $28k · revenue +5%

Funded once

  • WT
    WINDOW TO THE WORLD COMMUNICATIONS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $200k · revenue +26%
  • SD
    San Diego Chinese Historical Society and Museum
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue +13%
  • TT
    TEA THE ENTREPRENEUR ACADEMY
    one grant, 2024 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Loyola University of Chicago

We are chicago's jesuit, catholic university - a diverse community seeking god in all things and working to expand knowledge in the service of humanity through learning, justice, and faith.

Education
2
Toyota Technological Institute at Chicago

Achieving international impact through world-class research and education in fundamental computer science and information technology.

Education
3
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
4
The Chicago School of Professional Psychology

The Chicago School educates the next generation of change-makers in innovative theory and culturally competent practice to strengthen the integrated health of individuals, organizations, and communities.

Education
5
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
6
The University of Chicago Charter School Corporation

To Prepare Students for Success in Four-Year Colleges.

Education
7
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
8
National Opinion Research Center

See schedule onorc at the university of chicago conducts research and data science on critical societal issues to guide decision-making and the development of programs and public policy. our experts identify relationships and trends, and…

Social Science
9
Lake Forest Graduate School of Management

Lake Forest Graduate School of Management's mission is to bring the real world to business education and leadership development.

—
10
Chicagoland Chamber of Commerce

The chicagoland chamber of commerce combines the power of people, with our legacy of leadership and business advocacy, to drive a dynamic economy. we focus on delivering value for our members, making chicagoland a world-class place to live…

—
11
Chicago Maritime Museum

Operation of a nautical history museum.

—
12
Chicago Sun-Times Media Inc

Chicago sun-times serves the public interest by strengthening the well-being of our local communities and our democracy through independent local journalism.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Music Institute of Chicago; the most unlike its peers is Chicago Cred Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/26
Grantees still filing
8/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHICAGO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $17,285,506 · OtherCHICAGO COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONTHE COMMERCIAL CLUB FOUNDATION: $13,035,050 · OtherTHE COMMERCIAL CLUB FOUNDATION+7 more: $78,000 · OtherChicago Cred Inc: $7,000,000 · EmploymentChicago Cred IncThe Cara Program: $5,000,000 · EmploymentThe Cara Program+1 more: $300,000 · EmploymentFIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY: $10,385,000 · Arts & CultureFIELD MUSEUM OF NAT…+5 more: $270,000 · Arts & CultureDEPAUL UNIVERSITY: $3,000,000 · EducationUniversity of Chicago: $1,160,000 · Education+2 more: $37,750 · EducationRush University Medical Center: $1,858,086 · Health+1 more: $25,000 · HealthCHINESE AMERICAN SERVICE LEAGUE INC: $700,124 · Community ImprovementGREATER JAMAICA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $305,000 · Community ImprovementInternational Flight Services: $101,000 · PhilanthropyONE TREE PLANTED INC: $5,500 · Philanthropy
Other$30,398,556Employment$12,300,000Arts & Culture$10,655,000Education$4,197,750Health$1,883,086Community Improvement$1,005,124Philanthropy$106,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE COMMERCIAL CLUB FOUNDATION: $13,035,050 over 2y, 46% of budgetFIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY: $10,385,000 over 5y, 4.3% of budgetThe Cara Program: $5,000,000 over 1y, 24% of budgetDEPAUL UNIVERSITY: $3,000,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetRush University Medical Center: $1,858,086 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUniversity of Chicago: $1,160,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHINESE AMERICAN SERVICE LEAGUE INC: $700,124 over 6y, 2.2% of budgetGREATER JAMAICA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $305,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetAUTOMOTIVE MENTORING GROUP INC: $300,000 over 2y, 28% of budgetWINDOW TO THE WORLD COMMUNICATIONS INC: $200,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetInternational Flight Services: $101,000 over 3y, 32% of budgetNAVY PIER INC: $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPEACETREES VIETNAM: $30,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetLycee Francais de Chicago Inc: $27,750 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBRAIN RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetNORTH AMERICAN WORD GAME PLAYERS ASSOCIATION: $10,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetSan Diego Chinese Historical Society and Museum: $10,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetTEA THE ENTREPRENEUR ACADEMY: $6,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetNATIONAL MUSEUM OF MEXICAN ART FKA MEXICAN FINE ARTS CENTER MUSEUM: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF ALZHEIMER'S CHICAGO: $5,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetMUSIC INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE OCEAN CLEANUP FOUNDATION: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF CHICAGO: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Chicago Community…Elizabeth Morse Chari…The Robert Thomas Bob…Robert R McCormick Fo…United Way of Metropo…AbbVie FoundationJohn D and Catherine …Jpmorgan Chase Founda…The Blackbaud Giving …Charities Aid Foundat…The Bank of America C…Gs Donor Advised Phil…
The Chicago Community TrustIL19.6× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Chicago Community Trust · Elizabeth Morse Charitable Trust Xxxxx1008 · The Robert Thomas Bobins Foundation · Robert R McCormick Foundation · United Way of Metropolitan Chicago Inc · AbbVie Foundation · John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sue Ling Gin Foundation Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sue Ling Gin Foundation Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Sue Ling Gin’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home