Skip to content

· Private foundation

Sue & John Irvin Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$125k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Philanthropy$180kArts & Culture$80kAnimals$60kScience & Tech$45kHuman Services$10kEducation$5kHealth$5kFood & Nutrition$5k
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $35k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $40k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER GRE$50,000
WILD TRAILS NC$20,000
TOE RIVER ARTS COUNCIL INC$20,000
MUSTARD SEED COMMUNITY HEALTH$5,000
SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF NW NC$5,000
GUILFORD EDUCATION ALLIANCE$5,000
RECONSIDERED GOODS$5,000
ARTS COUNCIL OF GREATER GREENSBORO$5,000
BACK PACK BEGINNINGS$5,000
SHEPHERD'S CENTER OF GREENSBORO$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%BACK PACK BEGINNINGS: $5k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Greenville Center for Creative Arts

The greenville center for creative arts exists to enrich the cultural fabric of the communities we serve by providing a nurturing environment for art-education, appreciation and enjoyment, and by establishing a lasting legacy in the visual…

Arts & Culture
2
Green Hill Center for North Carolina Art

The mission of green hill center for nc art is to promote the visual arts of north carolina by engaging a broad community of artists, adults and children through dynamic exhibitions and educational programs while providing a platform for…

Arts & Culture
3
Greensboro Area Chamber of Commerce Inc

To serve as greensboro, north carolina's principal economic and community development organization. our goal is to strategically develop a vibrant community that creates, expands, and attracts business while advancing the quality of life…

—
4
Greensboro Historical Museum Inc

Together with its diverse communities, the organization collects objects and stories, connects generations, and challenges people to explore our city's past, present and future. the museum sparks wonder through bold exhibitions and…

Arts & Culture
5
Goodwill Industries of Central North Car

Goodwill industries of central north carolina, inc.'s mission is improving lives and enriching communities through the power of work

Employment
6
Greensboro Opera Company

Greensboro opera is a community-based company dedicated to fostering the growth of opera and to presenting professional productions of the highest artistic caliber for the enjoyment, education, and enrichment of the triad region of north…

Arts & Culture
7
Greenville Theatre Arts Center
—
8
Carolina Art Association Dba Gibbes Museum of Art

The mission of the gibbes museum of art is to enhance lives through art by engaging people of every background and experience with art and artists of enduring quality; collect and preserve the art that touches charleston; and provide…

Arts & Culture
9
Greensboro Children's Museum Inc

The greensboro children's museum engages all children and families in hands-on, fun, learning experiences which contribute to their growth and development through play, creation, outdoor exploration, and stem activities.

Unclassified
10
Greenville Area Development Corporation

Promoting and enhancing the economic growth and development of greenville county south carolina; gadc was formed by greenville county council.

Community Improvement
11
The Greater Greenbrier Valley
Philanthropy
12
Center for Visual Artists Greensboro Inc

Support emerging artists of all ages through education programs, exhibition opportunities, and community outreach.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Arts Council of Greensboro Inc; the most unlike its peers is Reconsidered Goods Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
5/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER GREENSBORO INC: $180,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER GREENSBORO INCTOE RIVER ARTS COUNCIL INC: $50,000 · OtherTOE RIVER ARTS COUNCIL I…GOODLY FRAME THEATER: $20,000 · OtherGOODLY FRAME THEATERTHE SHEPHERD'S CENTER OF GREENSBORO INC: $5,000 · OtherTHE SHEPHERD'S CENTER OF…BACKPACK BEGINNINGS: $5,000 · OtherBACKPACK BEGINNINGSGUILFORD EDUCATION ALLIANCE: $5,000 · OtherGUILFORD EDUCATION ALLIA…WILD TAILS NC INC: $60,000 · AnimalsWILD TAILS NC INCTHE NATURAL SCIENCE CENTER OF GREENSBORO INC DBA GREENSBORO SCIENCE CENTER: $45,000 · Arts & CultureTHE NATURAL SC…UNITED ARTS COUNCIL OF GREENSBORO INC: $5,000 · Arts & CultureUNITED ARTS CO…SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF NORTHWEST NC INC: $5,000 · Food & NutritionMUSTARD SEED COMMUNITY HEALTH: $5,000 · HealthRECONSIDERED GOODS INC: $5,000 · Environment
Philanthropy$180,000Other$85,000Animals$60,000Arts & Culture$50,000Food & Nutrition$5,000Health$5,000Environment$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER GREENSBORO INC: $180,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetWILD TAILS NC INC: $60,000 over 3y, 16% of budgetTOE RIVER ARTS COUNCIL INC: $50,000 over 4y, 4.7% of budgetTHE NATURAL SCIENCE CENTER OF GREENSBORO INC DBA GREENSBORO SCIENCE CENTER: $45,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetUNITED ARTS COUNCIL OF GREENSBORO INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF NORTHWEST NC INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRECONSIDERED GOODS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetBACKPACK BEGINNINGS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGUILFORD EDUCATION ALLIANCE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Tannenbaum-Sternberger Foundation IncNC17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Tannenbaum-Sternberger Foundation Inc · Hillsdale Fund · Moses H Cone Memorial Hospital Operating Corporation · Moses Cone - Wesley Long Community Health Foundation · Amg Charitable Gift Foundation · Lincoln Financial Foundation Inc · The Allendale Fund · Hagan Family Fund · The Edward M Armfield Sr Foundation I · Weaver Foundation Inc · The Cemala Foundation Inc · The VF Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sue & John Irvin Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sue & John Irvin Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Sue & John Irvin’s filings →

    More from the funding graph