Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Stuart and Susan Bell Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$40k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$197kHealth$138kHuman Services$113kCommunity Improvement$10kArts & Culture$10kRecreation & Sports$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $30k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$63k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BRIGHAM AND WOMENS FOUNDATION$10,000
NEW ENGLAND LIFE FLIGHT INC (DBA BOSTON MEDFLIGHT)$10,000
NANTUCKET CHILDREN'S CHARITY$10,000
CARVER CENTER FOUNDATION$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $93k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%LEEDS ENDOWMENT: $10k → 11%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CRISIS CENTER (DVCC): $15k → 9%TUESDAY'S CHILDREN: $5k → 14%LEEDS ENDOWMENT: $10k → 11%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CRISIS CENTER (DVCC): $15k → 9%LEEDS ENDOWMENT: $10k → 11%LEEDS ENDOWMENT: $8k → 11%LEEDS ENDOWMENT: $5k → 11%LEEDS ENDOWMENT: $5k → 11%LEEDS ENDOWMENT: $5k → 11%LEEDS ENDOWMENT: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
IL
NY
MA
CT
NE
MD
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$422k · 8 repeat orgs$55k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +53% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

8 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
7

Total granted

$422k
$50k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+53%
0%

Still filing today

63%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationRecreation & SportsArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    THE CHESHIRE ACADEMY
    2× · 2017–2018 · $86k · revenue +18%
  • NE
    NEW ENGLAND LIFE FLIGHT INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $80k · revenue +99%
  • LF
    LEEDS FOUNDATION PBC INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $58k · revenue +114%

Funded once

  • BF
    Brothers for Life
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue 0%
  • II
    INSPIRE INC
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +5%
  • NC
    NANTUCKET COTTAGE HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2020 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Beth Israel Hospital & Children's Hospital Medical Care Corporation

Pediatric healthcare, education & research

2
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
3
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
4
Nichols College

Nichols college strives to develop tomorrow's leaders through a dynamic, career-focused business education. the college transforms students into successful graduates who respond to challenges, are eager for responsibility, and assume…

Education
5
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
6
The Center for Discovery Inc

The center for discovery offers individuals with a range of disabilities and medical frailties - and their families - innovative educational, clinical, residential, social and creative arts experiences designed to enrich their lives…

Health
7
Brunswick School Inc

Brunswick school, inc. is a day school for boys in pre-kindergarten through twelfth grade. the purpose of the school is to educate the "whole boy". it does so by helping boys and young men - without regard to culture, ethnicity or religion…

Education
8
The New England Center for Children Inc

The necc exists to improve the lives of children with autism in the commonwealth of massachusetts, across new england and around the world. through direct-care services, education, parent training, research, professional development, and a…

9
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

10
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Inc

Tertiary care academic medical center

Health
11
Brooks School

Brooks school is a college preparatory school that seeks to provide the most meaningful educational experience our students will have in their lives.

Education
12
New England Lawboston

New england law/boston dedicates itself to preparing students to be successful lawyers and leaders in the public and private sectors through integrated practical, theoretical and ethical education of the highest caliber and to contributing…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Cheshire Academy and the most unlike its peers is Gladiator's Athletic Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

NANTUCKET CHILDREN'S CHARITY — $90,000 · OtherNANTUCKET CHILDREN'S CHARITYTHE CHESHIRE ACADEMY — $86,418 · OtherTHE CHESHIRE ACADEMYBRIGHAM AND WOMENS FOUNDATION — $37,500 · OtherBRIGHAM AND WOMENS FOUNDATIONCARVER CENTER — $20,000 · OtherCARVER CENTERNANTUCKET COTTAGE HOSPITAL — $10,000 · Other+2 more — $10,000 · OtherLEEDS FOUNDATION PBC INC — $58,000 · Human ServicesLEEDS FOUNDATION PBC I…DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CRISIS CENTER — $30,000 · Human ServicesDOMESTIC VIOLENCE CRIS…Tuesdays Child — $5,000 · Human ServicesTuesdays ChildNEW ENGLAND LIFE FLIGHT INC — $80,000 · HealthNEW ENGLAND LIFE FLI…The Danbury Hospital — $5,000 · HealthThe Danbury HospitalCARVER CENTER FOUNDATION INC — $20,250 · EducationINSPIRE INC — $10,000 · EducationBrothers for Life — $10,000 · Arts & CultureGLADIATOR'S ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION INC — $5,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$253,918Human Services$93,000Health$85,000Education$30,250Arts & Culture$10,000Recreation & Sports$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE CHESHIRE ACADEMY — $86,418 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetNEW ENGLAND LIFE FLIGHT INC — $80,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetLEEDS FOUNDATION PBC INC — $58,000 over 8y, 8.5% of budgetDOMESTIC VIOLENCE CRISIS CENTER — $30,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetCARVER CENTER FOUNDATION INC — $20,250 over 4y, 17% of budgetBrothers for Life — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetINSPIRE INC — $10,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetTuesdays Child — $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetThe Danbury Hospital — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE CHESHIRE ACADEMY
  • Who funds NEW ENGLAND LIFE FLIGHT INC
  • Who funds LEEDS FOUNDATION PBC INC
  • Who funds DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CRISIS CENTER
  • Who funds CARVER CENTER FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds Brothers for Life
  • Who funds INSPIRE INC
  • Who funds GLADIATOR'S ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds Tuesdays Child
  • Who funds The Danbury Hospital

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN10.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Stuart and Susan Bell Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 40%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 5%
  • Domestic Violence Crisis Center10% of income from government
  • New England Life Flight Inc5% of income from government
  • The Danbury Hospital1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Stuart and Susan Bell Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Stuart and Susan Bell Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph