Skip to content

· Private foundation

Stuart D Nevermann Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$28k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Education$36kReligion$16kHuman Services$13kRecreation & Sports$8kInternational$8kFood & Nutrition$6kArts & Culture$4kHousing & Shelter$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,190
Median grant
4
States reached
$648k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TRINITY LUTHERAN CHURCH$4,760
LUTHER COLLEGE$3,570
LUTHERAN SERVICES IN IOWA CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC$2,380
NORTH IOWA AREA COMM COLLEGE$2,380
LUTHERAN WORLD RELIEF$2,380
UNIVERSITY OF IOWA$1,400
EDUCATION FOUNDATION OF THE MASON CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS$1,400
NORTH IOWA AREA COMM COLLEGE$1,400
HEIFER INTERNATIONAL$1,190
MASON CITY HIGH SCHOOL$1,190
MASON CITY FAMILY YMCA$1,190
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF NORTH CENTRAL IOWA INC$1,190
UNIVERSITY OF IOWA$1,190
MASON CITY FOUNDATION$1,190
AMERICAN PARKINSON DISEASE ASSOCIATION$476
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $12k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%LUTHERAN SERVICES IN IOWA CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC: $2k → 7%LUTHERAN SERVICES IN IOWA CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC: $2k → 7%LUTHERAN SERVICES IN IOWA CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC: $2k → 7%LUTHERAN SERVICES IN IOWA CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC: $1k → 7%MASON CITY FAMILY YMCA: $1k → 12%MASON CITY FAMILY YMCA: $1k → 12%MASON CITY FAMILY YMCA: $1k → 12%MASON CITY FAMILY YMCA: $566 → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$96k · 16 repeat orgs$1k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +16% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
1

Total granted

$96k
$1k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
0%

Still filing today

56%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesFood & NutritionEducationInternationalEnvironmentHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LC
    LUTHER COLLEGE
    4× · 2022–2025 · $12k · revenue +1%
  • LS
    LUTHERAN SERVICES IN IOWA CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $8k · revenue +251%
  • LW
    LUTHERAN WORLD RELIEF INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $8k · revenue +3%

Funded once

  • TE
    THE EDUCATION FOUNDATION OF THE MASON CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS
    one grant, 2025 · $1k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Martin Luther Home Corporation

To provide healthcare and other related services for aging persons regardless of the ability of residents to pay for these services.

—
2
Food Bank of Iowa

The organization receives, warehouses, and distributes salvageable food items to non-profit tax exempt member agencies to feed the ill, needy, and infants.

Food & Nutrition
3
Iowa College Foundation

The foundation is organized to further the growth and development of private colleges and universities of higher education in iowa.

—
4
Habitat for Humanity of Central Iowa Inc

Habitat for humanity of central iowa, inc. works in partnership with god and people everywhere, from all walks of life, to develop communities with god's people in need by building houses, so that there are decent houses in decent…

—
5
Wisconsin Lutheran Home Ministries Inc

To share christ's love as we serve the spiritual, physical, intellectual and emotional needs of people entrusted to our care and others whose lives we touch.

—
6
Luther Classical College

Luther classical college educates lutherans in the classical, lutheran tradition and prepares them for godly vocations within family, church, and society, fostering christian culture through study of the best of our western heritage.

Education
7
United Way of North Central Iowa

Seeking to build a stronger, more caring community by forming partnerships with businesses, community experts, education & health & human service agencies to achieve targeted outcomes & sustained changes in community conditions which will…

Philanthropy
8
Watertown Lutheran Senior Housing Inc

To share christ's love as we serve the spiritual, physical, intellectual and emotional needs of people entrusted to our care and others whose lives we touch.

—
9
Habitat for Humanity of Iowa Inc

Seeking to put god's love into action, habitat for humanity of iowa brings people together to build homes, communities, and hope by partnering with local habitat for humanity organizations to offer financial products, resource development,…

Housing & Shelter
10
Common Good Iowa

Common good iowa engages iowans to create and advocate for research-based public policy that makes life better and more equitable for all who make iowa home.

—
11
Harwood Place Inc

Harwood place, inc. is dedicated to serving older adults and enriching the lives of those we touch by providing compassionate and loving care.

Housing & Shelter
12
Iowa Newspaper Association

To improve member newspapers

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lutheran Services in Iowa Charitable Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is American Parkinson Disease Assoc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TRINITY LUTHERAN CHURCH: $16,375 · OtherTRINITY LUTHERAN CHURCHNORTH IOWA AREA COMM COLLEGE: $13,338 · OtherNORTH IOWA AREA COMM COLLEGEUNIVERSITY OF IOWA: $9,244 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF IOWAMASON CITY HIGH SCHOOL: $4,094 · OtherMASON CITY HIGH SCHOOLHEIFER INTERNATIONAL: $4,093 · OtherHEIFER INTERNATIONALHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF NORTH CENTRAL IOWA: $4,093 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF NORTH CENTRAL IOWAMASON CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT: $3,750 · OtherMASON CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT+1 more: $818 · OtherLUTHER COLLEGE: $12,282 · EducationLUTHER COLLEGELUTHERAN SERVICES IN IOWA CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC: $8,188 · Human ServicesLUTHERAN SERVI…YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $4,093 · Human ServicesYOUNG MEN'S CH…LUTHERAN WORLD RELIEF INC: $8,187 · InternationalLUTHERAN …MASON CITY FOUNDATION: $4,093 · EnvironmentAMERICAN PARKINSON DISEASE ASSOC: $1,638 · HealthHAWKEYE HARVEST FOOD BANK: $819 · Food & NutritionCOMMUNITY KITCHEN OF NORTH IA INC: $819 · Food & NutritionTHE EDUCATION FOUNDATION OF THE MASON CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $1,400 · Philanthropy
Other$55,805Education$12,282Human Services$12,281International$8,187Environment$4,093Health$1,638Food & Nutrition$1,638Philanthropy$1,400

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLUTHER COLLEGE: $12,282 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLUTHERAN SERVICES IN IOWA CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC: $8,188 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetLUTHERAN WORLD RELIEF INC: $8,187 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMASON CITY FOUNDATION: $4,093 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF NORTH CENTRAL IOWA: $4,093 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $4,093 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN PARKINSON DISEASE ASSOC: $1,638 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE EDUCATION FOUNDATION OF THE MASON CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $1,400 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHAWKEYE HARVEST FOOD BANK: $819 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY KITCHEN OF NORTH IA INC: $819 over 4y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LUTHER COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds LUTHERAN SERVICES IN IOWA CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds LUTHERAN WORLD RELIEF INC ↗
  • Who funds MASON CITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF NORTH CENTRAL IOWA ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN PARKINSON DISEASE ASSOC ↗
  • Who funds THE EDUCATION FOUNDATION OF THE MASON CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS ↗
  • Who funds HAWKEYE HARVEST FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY KITCHEN OF NORTH IA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Bertha Stebens Charitable FoundationDE13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Bertha Stebens Charitable Foundation · Farrer Endowment Foundation · First Citizens Bank Charitable Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Stuart D Nevermann Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Stuart D Nevermann Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 47%
  • Lutheran World Relief Inc: 47% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Stuart D Nevermann’s filings →

More from the funding graph