Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Sonance Cares Inc

To work together with our parnters to leave a lasting impact on the plant, people, animals, and communities.

$1.1M
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$793k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20232024.

Human Services$1.3MYouth Development$139kAnimals$102kFood & Nutrition$75kInternational$75kHealth$70kPhilanthropy$70kEducation$60kOther$0
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 14 grants below total $1,108,317 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,134,502 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $26,185 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k11 grants · $163k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $153k
  • $250k+1 grant · $793k
$21,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$27k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ELEPHANT COOPERATION$792,750
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA$78,000
RX3 FOUNDATION$75,000
MERCY FOR ANIMALS$25,000
LIMB KIND FOUNDATION INC$25,000
RHINO 911$21,567
VETERAN HEALTH CHARITY (FITOPS FOUNDATION)$21,000
AOKI FOUNDATION$10,000
UNCONDITIONAL RESCUE$10,000
LAS PALMAS PTA$10,000
VIRTUAL WORLD SOCIETY$10,000
SHECKLER FOUNDATION$10,000
RADY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$10,000
COMPASSIONATE ANIMAL RESCUE FOR MEDICAL AID$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–24, $1.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ELEPHANT COOPERATION: $793k → 11%ELEPHANT COOPERATION: $415k → 11%RX3 FOUNDATION: $75k → 14%TILLY'S STARS & STRIPES: $25k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NH
WA
WI
NY
NV
CA
KY
WV
AZ
TN
HI
GA

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.4M · 4 repeat orgs$619k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +63% since the first grant, against +13% for the ones you funded once.

4 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
15

Total granted

$1.4M
$401k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+63%
+13%

Still filing today

100%
93%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $218k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24
AnimalsHealthHuman ServicesEducationPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EC
    ELEPHANT COOPERATION
    2× · 2023–2024 · $1.2M · revenue +63% · 33% of their budget
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA
    2× · 2023–2024 · $113k · revenue +35%
  • AF
    AOKI FOUNDATION
    2× · 2023–2024 · $20k · revenue +115%

Funded once

  • PP
    PAUL'S PANTRY INC
    one grant, 2023 · $75k · revenue +13%
  • SC
    SADDLEBACK COLLEGE FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue +79%
  • CR
    CASA ROMANTICA CULTURAL CENTER & GARDENS
    one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue +3%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Lichtenstein Family Foundation
Philanthropy
2
The Lulu Foundation
Philanthropy
3
The Animal Welfare Foundation
4
Global Animal Partnership
Animals
5
Born Free Foundation
6
Lsf Foundation
Philanthropy
7
The Serengeti Foundation
Environment
8
World Animal Protection

World animal protection is a global organization working to end factory farming and wildlife exploitation. we expose cruel systems, promote animal-friendly alternatives, and influence policy change. for over 75 years, we've been rewriting…

Animals
9
The Lef Foundation
10
Elephant Crew Foundation
Animals
11
Unlikely Collaborators Foundation
Philanthropy
12
The Fauna Foundation

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Veterans Future Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Virtual World Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyEnvironmental Conservation …Youth Development CentersLocal Food System Organizat…Military Veterans SupportAnimal Rescue and ShelterHealth Access Advocacy and …Community FoundationsCancer Support ServicesYouth Sports ProgramsChristian Missionary Organi…Youth Development ServicesCommunity College Foundatio…Food Banks and Pantries
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 17 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%0%<5yr15%8%5–10yr20%48%10–20yr17%20%20–35yr11%16%35–55yr13%8%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%0%<5yr15%2%5–10yr20%77%10–20yr17%16%20–35yr11%3%35–55yr13%1%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 3% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
3%1/29
the rest of the field
14%
26,002/186,949

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/29
Grantees still filing
18/29
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ELEPHANT COOPERATION — $1,207,750 · Human ServicesELEPHANT COOPERATIONEDWARD CHARLES FOUNDATION — $75,000 · Human ServicesEDWARD CHARLES FOUNDATION+1 more — $25,000 · Human ServicesBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA — $113,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE LIFT FOUNDATION — $15,000 · Youth DevelopmentMERCY FOR ANIMALS INC — $25,000 · AnimalsRhino 911 — $21,567 · AnimalsFRIENDS OF THE SEA LIONS INC DBA PACIFIC MARINE MAMMAL CENTER — $20,000 · AnimalsCOMPASSIONATE ANIMAL RESCUE FOR MEDICAL AID INC — $15,203 · AnimalsUNCONDITIONAL INC — $10,000 · AnimalsMAUI HUMANE SOCIETY — $10,000 · AnimalsSADDLEBACK COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $50,000 · EducationTILLY'S LIFE CENTER — $25,863 · EducationVIRTUAL WORLD SOCIETY — $10,000 · EducationOLIVE CREST — $25,000 · HealthLimb Kind Foundation — $25,000 · HealthJessie Rees Foundation — $25,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $10,000 · HealthPAUL'S PANTRY INC — $75,000 · Food & NutritionCASA ROMANTICA CULTURAL CENTER & GARDENS — $50,000 · Arts & CultureLEXINGTON LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION INC — $25,000 · Arts & CultureAOKI FOUNDATION — $20,000 · OtherTHE SHECKLER FOUNDATION — $10,000 · OtherRADY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION SAN DIEGO — $10,000 · OtherMATT LEINART FOUNDATION — $25,000 · OtherLAS PALMAS ELEMENTARY PTA — $10,000 · OtherVETERANS FUTURE FOUNDATION — $21,000 · OtherCHARLES A AND ANNE MORROW LINDBERGH FOUNDATION — $10,580 · OtherInternational FIRST Committee Associatio co Toohey Law Group — $10,000 · Other
Human Services$1,307,750Youth Development$128,000Animals$101,770Education$85,863Health$85,000Food & Nutrition$75,000Arts & Culture$75,000Other$116,580

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetELEPHANT COOPERATION — $1,207,750 over 2y, 33% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA — $113,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPAUL'S PANTRY INC — $75,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetEDWARD CHARLES FOUNDATION — $75,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSADDLEBACK COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetCASA ROMANTICA CULTURAL CENTER & GARDENS — $50,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetTILLY'S LIFE CENTER — $25,863 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetOLIVE CREST — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLimb Kind Foundation — $25,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetLEXINGTON LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION INC — $25,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetMERCY FOR ANIMALS INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSTARS AND STRIPES CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetJessie Rees Foundation — $25,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetRhino 911 — $21,567 over 1y, 13% of budgetVETERANS FUTURE FOUNDATION — $21,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetAOKI FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE SEA LIONS INC DBA PACIFIC MARINE MAMMAL CENTER — $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCOMPASSIONATE ANIMAL RESCUE FOR MEDICAL AID INC — $15,203 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetTHE LIFT FOUNDATION — $15,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetCHARLES A AND ANNE MORROW LINDBERGH FOUNDATION — $10,580 over 1y, 39% of budgetVIRTUAL WORLD SOCIETY — $10,000 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetUNCONDITIONAL INC — $10,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetInternational FIRST Committee Associatio co Toohey Law Group — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLAS PALMAS ELEMENTARY PTA — $10,000 over 1y, 9.3% of budgetMAUI HUMANE SOCIETY — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE SHECKLER FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 5.2% of budgetRADY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION SAN DIEGO — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sonance FoundationCA22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sonance Foundation · Orange County Community Foundation · The Van Metre Family Foundation Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Sonance Cares Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Sonance Cares Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Sonance Cares Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph