Skip to content

· Private foundation

Stribling Funding Corporation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$162k
Granted FY2025still arriving
23
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$115k
Largest
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Education$325kArts & Culture$242kHealth$79kPhilanthropy$48kCommunity Improvement$38kAnimals$23kReligion$13kPublic Safety & Disaster$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k21 grants · $37k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $115k
$1,600
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SAN ANGELO MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS$115,000
FORT CONCHO FOUNDATION$10,000
TEXAS TECH FOUNDATION$6,000
SAN ANGELO ART CLUB$5,000
CRIME STOPPERS OF SAN ANGELO INC$2,500
RUST STREET MINISTRIES$2,500
YOUNG LIFE (SAN ANGELO)$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,065
PEACEFUL VALLEY DONKEY RESCUE$2,000
WTRC$2,000
SLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE (LUBBOCK CHAPTER)$2,000
DOWNTOWN SAN ANGELO INC$1,600
SECOND CHANCE - MASON ANIMAL RESCUE$1,500
BOBCAT BOOSTER CLUB$1,300
SAN ANGELO SYMPHONY$1,250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $100) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HOSPICE OF LUBBOCK: $100 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$693k · 25 repeat orgs$105k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +16% since the first grant, against +16% for those funded once.

25 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
43

Total granted

$693k
$80k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+16%

Still filing today

56%
35%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureAnimalsEducationPhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TT
    TEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $301k · revenue +20%
  • SA
    San Angelo Museum of Fine Arts
    7× · 2019–2025 · $189k · revenue +67%
  • DS
    DOWNTOWN SAN ANGELO INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $8k · revenue +36%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $15k
  • TL
    TEXAS LYCEUM ASSOCIATION INC DBA THE TEXAS LYCEUMgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +27%
  • TE
    TEMPLE EMANU-EL
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
San Antonio Automobile Dealers Association Foundation Inc
—
2
Center for 20TH Century Texas Studies
—
3
San Antonio Report

Publishing a local online news source. We believe a well informed and connected community is essential to making San Antonio a better place to live, work and play.

Arts & Culture
4
The Museum of Western Art

The Museum of Western Art in the Texas Hill Country is dedicated to excellence in the collection, preservation and display of Western art.

Arts & Culture
5
Texas Society of Architects

Texas Society of Architects is the voice for Texas architecture, supporting the creation of safe, beautiful, sustainable environments.

—
6
Art Museum of South Texas Endowment Trust Fund

Provide financial support for the south texas institute for the arts.

—
7
Cca Texas Fund

To support coastal conservation association in carrying out the charitable and educational purpose for which it was organized and is operated, namely, promoting and advancing the preservation, conservation and protection of marine, plant…

Environment
8
Texas State University Development Foundation

To support and further the mission of texas state university through the acceptance and investment of gifts established as endowments benefiting the students, faculty and staff.

Education
9
San Angelo Civic Theater Inc

The mission of san angelo civic theatre is to culturally enrich, educate, and entertain through the art of theatre and theatrical performance and to encourage community participation in all aspects thereof.

—
10
San Jacinto Museum and Battlefield Association

To collect and preserve significant historical materials that relate to the early history and culture of Texas and to promote the study of the history of Texas through exhibits, publications, and educational programs.

Arts & Culture
11
San Antonio a & M Club Foundation

To promote fellowship among former students, current students, and friends of texas a&m, to spread the aggie spirit across the greater san antonio area, and to provide scholarships to bexar county students attending texas a&m university.

Education
12
Texas State Alumni Association

None

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of the Concho Valley Inc; the most unlike its peers is Spirit of Eden. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

37 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 37 of the 80 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
37/37
Grantees still filing
23/37
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INC: $300,500 · EducationTEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INC+2 more: $1,500 · EducationWEST TEXAS REHAB CENTER: $48,887 · OtherWEST TEXAS REHAB CENTERSAN ANGELO ART CLUB: $16,500 · OtherSAN ANGELO ART CLUBIndividual grant recipient: $15,200 · OtherIndividual grant recipientLAURA W BUSH INSTITUTE FOR WOMEN'S HEALTH: $15,200 · OtherLAURA W BUSH INSTITUTE FOR WOME…MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER: $13,000 · OtherMD ANDERSON CANCER CENTERTEXAS LYCEUM ASSOCIATION INC DBA THE TEXAS LYCEUM: $10,000 · OtherFORT CONCHO FOUNDATION: $10,000 · OtherTEMPLE EMANU-EL: $10,000 · OtherSECOND CHANCE - MASON ANIMAL RESCUE: $9,000 · Other+50 more: $85,105 · Other+50 moreSan Angelo Museum of Fine Arts: $189,400 · Arts & CultureSan Angelo Museum of Fine A…DOWNTOWN SAN ANGELO INC: $7,600 · Arts & Culture+4 more: $10,000 · Arts & CultureSAN ANGELO AREA FOUNDATION: $31,500 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WEST TEXAS: $10,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF THE CONCHO VALLEY INC: $5,000 · Philanthropy+2 more: $1,750 · PhilanthropyDEL RIO CHAMBER FOUNDATION: $30,000 · Community Improvement+1 more: $600 · Community ImprovementMASON VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $10,100 · Public Safety & DisasterHumane Society of Tom Green County Concho Valley PAWS: $5,750 · AnimalsPeaceful Valley Donkey Rescue Inc: $2,000 · AnimalsAUSTIN BOXER RESCUE: $500 · AnimalsCASSIES PLACE: $350 · Animals
Education$302,000Other$232,892Arts & Culture$207,000Philanthropy$48,250Community Improvement$30,600Public Safety & Disaster$10,100Animals$8,600

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INC: $300,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetSan Angelo Museum of Fine Arts: $189,400 over 7y, 2.8% of budgetSAN ANGELO AREA FOUNDATION: $31,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDEL RIO CHAMBER FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 3y, 15% of budgetMASON VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $10,100 over 2y, 3.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WEST TEXAS: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTEXAS LYCEUM ASSOCIATION INC DBA THE TEXAS LYCEUM: $10,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetFORT CONCHO FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 9.4% of budgetDOWNTOWN SAN ANGELO INC: $7,600 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetSAN ANGELO SYMPHONY SOCIETY: $7,180 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetHumane Society of Tom Green County Concho Valley PAWS: $5,750 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetRanching Heritage Association: $5,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSCIENCE SPECTRUM INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetUNITED WAY OF THE CONCHO VALLEY INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCASETA-Center for the Advancement & Study of Early Texas Art: $3,500 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetSAN ANGELO CULTURAL AFFAIRS COUNCIL: $3,100 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetSAN ANGELO SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetTEXAS HEAT BASEBALL TEAM: $1,500 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetSAN ANGELO SYMPHONY GUILD INC: $1,050 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetCENTRAL BOBCATS BOOSTER CLUB INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTHE HOWARD COLLEGE AT SAN ANGELO FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF CENTRAL TEXAS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLUEBONNET CASA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetWEST TEXAS COUNSELING AND GUIDANCE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJUNIOR LEAGUE OF SAN ANGELO INC: $600 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSEAQUIST HOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTEXAS TECH ALUMNI ASSOCIATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAINT BENEDICT'S CHAPEL INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAUSTIN BOXER RESCUE: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCASSIES PLACE: $350 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSPIRIT OF EDEN: $250 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHOSPICE OF LUBBOCK INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetShannon Medical Center: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds San Angelo Museum of Fine Arts ↗
  • Who funds SAN ANGELO AREA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DEL RIO CHAMBER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MASON VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WEST TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS LYCEUM ASSOCIATION INC DBA THE TEXAS LYCEUM ↗
  • Who funds FORT CONCHO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DOWNTOWN SAN ANGELO INC ↗
  • Who funds SAN ANGELO SYMPHONY SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds Humane Society of Tom Green County Concho Valley PAWS ↗
  • Who funds Ranching Heritage Association ↗
  • Who funds SCIENCE SPECTRUM INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF THE CONCHO VALLEY INC ↗
  • Who funds CASETA-Center for the Advancement & Study of Early Texas Art ↗
  • Who funds SAN ANGELO CULTURAL AFFAIRS COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds CRIME STOPPERS OF SAN ANGELO INC ↗
  • Who funds RUST STREET MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds SAN ANGELO SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Peaceful Valley Donkey Rescue Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

San Angelo Area FoundationTX42.2× affinity18 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: San Angelo Area Foundation · San Angelo Health Foundation · Art and Eva Camunez Tucker Foundation · Mary Ellen Kent Bunyard Family Foundation · American Electric Power Foundation · Pak Foundation · Texas Trust Gives · Diekemper Family Foundation Inc · Texas Instruments Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Stribling Funding Corporation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Stribling Funding Corporation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Stribling Funding Corporation?

    Find your warmest path to Stribling Funding Corporation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 80 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Stribling Funding’s filings →

    More from the funding graph