Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Streska Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$36k
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What you fund
0190% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Community Improvement$36kReligion$15kHuman Services$12kHealth$8kPublic Benefit$6kArts & Culture$6kRecreation & Sports$4kYouth Development$4kOther$0
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$2,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$305k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NORTH RIVER COMMISSION$6,000
QUEEN OF ALL SAINTS$5,000
MAYFAIR CIVIC ASSOCIATION$4,000
NORTHWEST ARTS CONNECTION$3,000
WELL OF MERCY$3,000
MISERICORDIA HEART OF MERCY$2,500
MAYFAIR PARK ADVISORY COUNCIL$2,000
MERCY HOME FOR BOYS & GIRLS$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
ALZHEIMER ASSOCIATION$2,000
BINSTEIN FAMILY FOUNDATION$2,000
ALBANY PARK THEATER PROJECT$1,000
GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY$1,000
BUILDING PEACEFUL BRIDGES$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%YOUTH SERVICES: $500 → 14%WELL OF MERCY: $5k → 14%WELL OF MERCY: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$91k · 11 repeat orgs$15k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
9

Total granted

$91k
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+29%

Still filing today

27%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesHealthCommunity ImprovementFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NR
    NORTH RIVER COMMISSION
    3× · 2021–2024 · $36k · revenue +226%
  • QO
    QUEEN OF ALL SAINTS
    3× · 2020–2024 · $10k
  • WO
    WELL OF MERCY INC
    2× · 2022–2024 · $8k · revenue -27%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $6k
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2023 · $1k
  • CP
    CHICAGO PUBLIC MEDIA INC
    one grant, 2023 · $500 · revenue -8%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Chicago Independent Radio Project

Operation of studio space and facilities for community radio station. The station is intended to benefit thousands of listeners and various music and arts appreciation groups throughout the chicago area.

Arts & Culture
2
Chicago Media Project

To impact society through the powerful tools of media and film. we are a resource for uniting individuals interested in media and developing a core group of informed citizens.

Public Benefit
3
Chicago Refugee Coalition

The Chicago Refugee Coalition is a 501c3 non-profit organization dedicated ot the alleviation of human suffering through innovative partnerships, advocacy and community empowerment.

Human Services
4
Chicago Workers' Collaborative Nfp

Chicago Workers' Collaborative's mission is to promote full employment and equality for the lowest wage-earners, primarily temporary staffing workers, in the Chicago region through leadership and skills training, critical assistance and…

Education
5
Chicago International Film Festival Inc Cinema-Chicago

Cinema/Chicago, the non-profit 501(c)(3) presenting organization of the Chicago International Film Festival, enriches the community through year-round programming devoted to international and independent cinema. We strengthen communication…

Arts & Culture
6
A Better Chicago

A better chicago is changing how chicago fights poverty by investing in bold ideas that create opportunity for our youth.

Human Services
7
Chicago Sun-Times Media Inc

Chicago sun-times serves the public interest by strengthening the well-being of our local communities and our democracy through independent local journalism.

8
Garfield Park Community Council

Garfield Park Community Council is dedicated to the revitalization of Garfield Park community on Chicago's West Side, a neighborhood of rich history, committed residents, and tremendous opportunities.

Community Improvement
9
Community Counseling Centers of Chicago Inc

To Provide counseling, crisis intervention, case management, psychosocial rehabilitative and vocational services to mentally ill and substance abuse clients in outpatient and community based settings.

Health
10
Chicago Women in Philanthropy

Chicago Women in Philanthropy (CWIP) promotes collaboration between philanthropic and nonprofit leaders by offering opportunities to share ideas and insight and to network. CWIP gives voice to the gender lens by encouraging philanthropic…

Community Improvement
11
Block Club Chicago Nfp

Block club chicago is a nonprofit news organization dedicated to delivering reliable, nonpartisan and essential coverage of chicago's diverse neighborhoods.

Education
12
Illinois Community for Displaced Immigrants

Serving recently arrived migrants and asylum seekers in the Chicagoland area and is committed to upholding the dignity and human rights of immigrants.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chicago Public Media Inc and the most unlike its peers is Samaritan Interfaith Counseling Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
6/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

QUEEN OF ALL SAINTS — $10,000 · OtherQUEEN OF ALL SAINTSIndividual grant recipient — $7,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientALZHEIMER ASSOCIATION — $6,000 · OtherALZHEIMER ASSOCIATIONMAYFAIR CIVIC ASSOCIATION — $6,000 · OtherMAYFAIR CIVIC ASSOCIATIONIndividual grant recipient — $6,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMISERICORDIA HEART OF MERCY — $5,000 · OtherMISERICORDIA HEART OF MERCYMAYFAIR PARK ADVISORY COUNCIL — $4,000 · OtherMAYFAIR PARK ADVISORY COUNCILMERCY HOME FOR BOYS & GIRLS — $4,000 · OtherMERCY HOME FOR BOYS & GIRLSBINSTEIN FAMILY FOUNDATION — $3,000 · OtherBINSTEIN FAMILY FOUNDATIONNORTHWEST ARTS CONNECTION — $3,000 · OtherNORTHWEST ARTS CONNECTION+2 more — $1,500 · OtherNORTH RIVER COMMISSION — $36,000 · Community ImprovementNORTH RIVER COMMISSIONWELL OF MERCY INC — $8,000 · Human ServicesWELL OF M…YOUTH SERVICES OF GLENVIEWNORTHBROOK — $500 · Human ServicesYOUTH SER…GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY — $2,250 · Food & NutritionCHICAGO PUBLIC MEDIA INC — $500 · Arts & CultureWINDOW TO THE WORLD COMMUNICATIONS INC — $500 · Arts & CultureChicago Cabaret Professionals — $500 · Arts & CultureAlbany Park Theater Project — $1,000 · Youth DevelopmentCIRCLE OF FRIENDS — $300 · HealthSamaritan Interfaith Counseling Center — $250 · HealthBUILDING PEACEFUL BRIDGES — $500 · Philanthropy
Other$55,500Community Improvement$36,000Human Services$8,500Food & Nutrition$2,250Arts & Culture$1,500Youth Development$1,000Health$550Philanthropy$500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNORTH RIVER COMMISSION — $36,000 over 3y, 3.6% of budgetWELL OF MERCY INC — $8,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY — $2,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAlbany Park Theater Project — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHICAGO PUBLIC MEDIA INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUTH SERVICES OF GLENVIEWNORTHBROOK — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWINDOW TO THE WORLD COMMUNICATIONS INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBUILDING PEACEFUL BRIDGES — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetChicago Cabaret Professionals — $500 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCIRCLE OF FRIENDS — $300 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSamaritan Interfaith Counseling Center — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NORTH RIVER COMMISSION
  • Who funds WELL OF MERCY INC
  • Who funds GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY
  • Who funds Albany Park Theater Project
  • Who funds CHICAGO PUBLIC MEDIA INC
  • Who funds YOUTH SERVICES OF GLENVIEWNORTHBROOK
  • Who funds WINDOW TO THE WORLD COMMUNICATIONS INC
  • Who funds BUILDING PEACEFUL BRIDGES
  • Who funds Chicago Cabaret Professionals
  • Who funds CIRCLE OF FRIENDS
  • Who funds Samaritan Interfaith Counseling Center

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Chicago Community TrustIL13.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Chicago Community Trust · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Streska Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph