Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Stout Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$23k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What you fund
0196% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Philanthropy$115kHuman Services$49kHealth$25kEducation$20kReligion$9kRecreation & Sports$6kPublic Safety & Disaster$4kEnvironment$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$2,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$334k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OKAUCHEE LIONS COMMUNITY PARK$6,000
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF COLLIER COU$3,000
ST JUDES CHILDRENS HOSPITAL$3,000
STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS$2,500
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC$2,000
THE IMMOKALEE FOUNDATION INC$2,000
MERCY SHIPS$1,500
ASPCA$1,500
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF TEXAS HILL$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $50k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $500 → 14%AVOW HOSPICE: $100 → 10%GUADALUPE CENTER: $22k → 10%GUADALUPE CENTER: $10k → 10%GUADALUPE CENTER: $7k → 10%GUADALUPE CENTER: $5k → 10%GUADALUPE CENTER: $5k → 10%YOUTH HAVEN INC: $500 → 10%NAPLES TAKE A SOLDIER FISHING: $100 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
WI
NY
OH
PA
CO
DE
TN
NC
DC
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$185k · 12 repeat orgs$45k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +46% since the first grant, against +38% for the ones you funded once.

12 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
29

Total granted

$185k
$37k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
+38%

Still filing today

75%
48%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 56% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthPhilanthropyAnimalsFood & NutritionRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GC
    Guadalupe Center Inc
    5× · 2020–2024 · $48k · revenue +27%
  • TI
    THE IMMOKALEE FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2019–2025 · $12k · revenue +151%
  • STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION
    3× · 2021–2025 · $5k · revenue +112%

Funded once

  • NC
    NCH CENTER FOR PHILANTHROPY
    one grant, 2021 · $8k
  • TS
    THE SUPER JAKE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $7k · revenue -18%
  • TD
    THE DIVINE REDEEMER
    one grant, 2024 · $7k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Variety Children's Hospital

To inspire hope and promote lifelong health by providing the best care to every child.

Health
2
Orlando Health Inc

Orlando health is a trusted leader inspiring hope through the advancement of health. our mission as a community-owned organization is to improve the health and quality of life of the individuals and communities we serve.

Health
3
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
4
Clinic for the Rehabilitation of Wildlife Inc

The clinic for the rehabilitation of wildlife is a teaching hospital and visitor center dedicated to the saving of wildlife through state-of-the-art veterinary care, research, education, and conservation medicine.

Animals
5
Aerial Recovery

Aerial recovery's mission is to save lives and stop evil. through the creation and deployment of humanitarian special operators, aerial recovery brings together selected veterans, first responders, and mission-qualified civilians who,…

6
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
7
Jacksonville Humane Society Inc

The jacksonville humane society provides care, comfort and compassion to animals in need while engaging the hearts, hands and minds of our community to bring about an end to the killing of abandoned and orphaned shelter animals.

Animals
8
Doctors Hospital Inc

As part of the baptist health network, the mission of doctors hospital, inc. is to improve the health and well-being of individuals, and to promote the sanctity and preservation of life, in the communities we serve. baptist health is a…

Health
9
Mariners Hospital Inc

As part of the baptist health network, the mission of mariner's hospital is to improve the health and well-being of individuals, and to promote the sanctity and preservation of life, in the communities we serve. baptist health is a…

Health
10
Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Tampa Bay Florida Inc

Spca tampa bay is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization that operates pinellas county's only nonprofit for-all animal shelter assisting all animals in need, regardless of species or circumstance, at its 10-acre campus in largo. (continued on…

Animals
11
Miami Children's Health System Inc

Nicklaus Children's Health System is the region's only healthcare system exclusively for children. Our mission is to inspire hope and promote lifelong health by providing the best care to every child. TO PERFORM THE FUNCTIONS OF, OR TO…

Health
12
Sacred Heart Foundation Inc

Rooted in the loving ministry of jesus as healer, we commit ourselves to serving all persons with special attention to those who are poor and vulnerable. our catholic health ministry is dedicated to spiritually-center, holistic care which…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Patty Baker Humane Society Naples Inc and the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCancer Support OrganizationsCommunity FoundationsVeteran Support ServicesAnimal Rescue and AdoptionHospice Care ServicesCommunity Health CentersChristian Missionary Organi…Food Pantries & AssistanceEducation Equity Leadership
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 41 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number27%4%<5yr16%4%5–10yr20%12%10–20yr15%24%20–35yr9%24%35–55yr12%32%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value27%3%<5yr16%0%5–10yr20%49%10–20yr15%13%20–35yr9%31%35–55yr12%5%55yr+

The field is 27% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/26
the rest of the field
17%
17,089/103,018

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/25
Grantees still filing
19/25
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SWFL CHILDREN'S CHARITIES INC SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WINE & FOOD FEST — $96,500 · PhilanthropySWFL CHILDREN'S CHARITIES INC SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WIN…THE IMMOKALEE FOUNDATION INC — $12,000 · PhilanthropyTHE IMMOKALEE FOUNDATION INC+1 more — $300 · PhilanthropyST JUDES CHILDRENS HOSPITAL — $10,540 · OtherST JUDES CHILDRENS HOSPITALCOLLIER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $10,327 · OtherCOLLIER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION …NCH CENTER FOR PHILANTHROPY — $7,500 · OtherNCH CENTER FOR PHILANTHROPYTHE DIVINE REDEEMER — $6,940 · OtherTHE DIVINE REDEEMEROKAUCHEE LIONS COMMUNITY PARK — $6,000 · OtherOKAUCHEE LIONS COMMUNITY PARKEVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATION — $3,900 · OtherEVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATIONTHE CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA — $3,269 · Other+22 more — $14,521 · Other+22 moreGuadalupe Center Inc — $48,100 · Human ServicesGuadalupe Center Inc+4 more — $2,200 · Human ServicesTHE SUPER JAKE FOUNDATION — $7,219 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $3,055 · Health+2 more — $200 · HealthSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $4,550 · EducationTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $1,580 · AnimalsPATTY BAKER HUMANE SOCIETY NAPLES INC — $725 · AnimalsMercy Ships International — $1,500 · International
Philanthropy$108,800Other$62,997Human Services$50,300Health$10,474Education$4,550Animals$2,305International$1,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSWFL CHILDREN'S CHARITIES INC SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WINE & FOOD FEST — $96,500 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetGuadalupe Center Inc — $48,100 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE IMMOKALEE FOUNDATION INC — $12,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCOLLIER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $10,327 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SUPER JAKE FOUNDATION — $7,219 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $4,550 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA — $3,269 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $3,055 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $1,580 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST MATTHEWS HOUSE INC — $1,067 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHARRY CHAPIN FOOD BANK OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPATTY BAKER HUMANE SOCIETY NAPLES INC — $725 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYOUTH HAVEN INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHUNGER TASK FORCE INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG LIFE — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFirst Weber Foundation Inc — $300 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNAPLES TAKE A SOLDIER FISHING INC — $100 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFreedom Waters Foundation Inc — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAVOW Hospice Inc — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO6.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Stout Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 60%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Youth Haven Inc0% of income from government
  • Guadalupe Center Inc0% of income from government
  • Avow Hospice Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 45 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph