· Private foundation
Stoller Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k23 grants · $53k
- $10k–50k10 grants · $150k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $314k
- $250k+2 grants · $1.4M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PACIFIC UNIVERSITY | $925,000 |
| LOWER COLUMBIA COLLEGE | $500,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $152,500 |
| OR STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION | $56,800 |
| PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY | $55,000 |
| COMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF OK | $50,000 |
| OREGON BUSINESS ACADEMY | $25,000 |
| CAMPAIGN FOR LITERARY ARTS | $25,000 |
| HOPSCOTCH HEALTH FOUNDATION | $20,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $20,000 |
| RAIDEN SCIENCE FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| HEALTH NETWORK FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| ECO CHALLENGE ORG | $10,000 |
| HOMEWARD BOUND PETS | $10,000 |
| ROTARY FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $280k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 94% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
37 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2024, 25 since wound down; 25 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $136k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PUPACIFIC UNIVERSITY8× · 2017–2024 · $8.0M · revenue +9%
- LULinfield University2× · 2018–2019 · $505k · revenue +2%
FIRST AMERICANS MUSEUM FOUNDATION2× · 2022–2023 · $250k · revenue +85%
Funded once
- OIOREGON INTERNATIONAL AIRSHOW INCgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $50k · revenue +85%
- DPDANNYS PLACEone grant, 2023 · $50k
- POPORTLAND OPERA ASSOCIATION INCone grant, 2019 · $25k · revenue -61%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Orla serves as the leading industry advocate, striving to protect, improve and promote oregon hospitality.
The oregon center for public policy's mission is to achieve economic justice for all oregonians through research, analysis, and advocacy. ocpp works to change policies that foster economic security and stability for all oregonians. we do…
Connecting people across oregon and the pacific northwest through the power of a shared story.
Oregon research institute is an independent behavioral sciences research center dedicated to understanding human behavior and improving the quality of human life through the prevention and treatment of health, educational, and social…
Oregon Justice Network is an alliance built and staffed by criminal legal system impacted people advocating for the well-being of people affected or at-risk of being affected by carceral systems. Our work centers around restorative…
To ensure economic prosperity in the portland region by providing strong leadership, partnership, and programs that encourage business growth and vitality.
Oregon agricultural trust partners with farmers and ranchers to protect agricultural lands for the benefit of oregons economy, communities, and landscapes.
Leading the transformation of primary care to achieve health equity for all.
To support public policies that will help oregon's economy and create new family supporting jobs in oregon.
Portland state university foundation is responsible for raising and managing private resources to advance psu's priorities and mission to be a leading urban university.
Promote economic and social fairness by working in coalition open a broad range of issues and activities in the public arena
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greater Portland Inc and the most unlike its peers is Metropolitan School of Dance Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 24 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 9% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
61 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 61 of the 123 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PACIFIC UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds Linfield University ↗
- Who funds FIRST AMERICANS MUSEUM FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds EVERGREEN AVIATION AND SPACE MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF OKLAHOMA ↗
- Who funds Oregon State University Foundation ↗
- Who funds VETERANS LEGACIES INC ↗
- Who funds OREGON HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds OREGON INTERNATIONAL AIRSHOW INC ↗
- Who funds OREGON BUSINESS ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds Artists Repertory Theatre ↗
- Who funds YAMHILL COUNTY LIVESTOCK ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
- Who funds PORTLAND OPERA ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds Minnesota Ovarian Cancer Alliance Inc ↗
- Who funds LITERARY ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds Oregon Environmental Council ↗
- Who funds FOSTERFUL ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST EARTH INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds HEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION FKA HEALTH NET FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Raiden Science Foundation ↗
- Who funds BLACK UNITED FUND OF OREGON ↗
- Who funds GETLINS CORNER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · The Autzen Foundation · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust · Maybelle Clark Macdonald Fund · M J Murdock Charitable Trust · The Collins Foundation · Rose E Tucker Charitable Trust · Onpoint Community Credit Union · The Harold & Arlene Schnitzer Care Foundation · The Reser Family Foundation · Juan Young Trust · OCF Joseph E Weston Public Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Stoller Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Artists Repertory Theatre — 48% of income from government
- Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation — 31% of income from government
- Boys and Girls Clubs of Bend Inc — 16% of income from government
- Oklahoma City Family Justice Center Inc — 14% of income from government
- Oregon Historical Society — 10% of income from government
- Literary Arts Inc — 10% of income from government
- Linfield University — 4% of income from government
- Pacific University — 2% of income from government
- Pivot Inc — 2% of income from government
- Evergreen Aviation and Space Museum — 2% of income from government
- Portland Opera Association Inc — 2% of income from government
- Black United Fund of Oregon — 1% of income from government
- First Americans Museum Foundation — 1% of income from government
- Oregon Business Academy — 0% of income from government
- Greater Portland Inc — 0% of income from government
- Oregon State University Foundation — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Stoller Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Stoller Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.