Skip to content
Stoddart Harry T Uw at a glance

· Private foundation

Stoddart Harry T Uw

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$82k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$21k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Education$302kHealth$59kScience & Tech$5kEmployment$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k14 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $62k
$1,200
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YALE UNIVERSITY$21,200
UNIVERSITY OF PENNA TRUSTEES$21,000
PRESBYTERIAN MEDICAL CENTER$20,000
WILKES UNIVERSITY$3,600
BLOOMSBURG UNIVERSITY$2,400
PENN STATE SCRANTON CAMPUS$1,200
LUZERNE COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE$1,200
JOHNSON COLLEGE$1,200
EMPIRE BEAUTY SCHOOL$1,200
UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH$1,200
MISERICORDIA UNIVERSITY$1,200
LOCK HAVEN UNIVERSITY$1,200
THE UNIVERSITY OF SCRANTON$1,200
LACKAWANNA COLLEGE$1,200
PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY$1,200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–21) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 88% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%BUCKS COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $2k → 6%ELIZABETHTOWN COLLEGE: $1k → 9%KUTZTOWN UNIVERSITY: $2k → 11%DREXEL UNIVERSITY: $1k → 11%LACKAWANNA COLLEGE: $1k → 13%ALLEGHENY COLLEGE: $1k → 14%BLOOMSBURG UNIVERSITY: $1k → 14%INDIANA UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $1k → 14%WILKES BARRE AREA CAREER & TECH CTR: $1k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $24k → 22%ITHACA COLLEGE: $1k → 16%BUCKS COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $1k → 6%ELIZABETHTOWN COLLEGE: $1k → 9%KUTZTOWN UNIVERSITY: $1k → 11%DREXEL UNIVERSITY: $1k → 11%LACKAWANNA COLLEGE: $1k → 13%ALLEGHENY COLLEGE: $1k → 14%INDIANA UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $1k → 14%WYOMING VALLEY HEALTH & ED FND: $1k → 15%PRESBYTERIAN MEDICAL CENTER: $23k → 22%ITHACA COLLEGE: $1k → 16%ELIZABETHTOWN COLLEGE: $1k → 9%DREXEL UNIVERSITY: $1k → 11%LACKAWANNA COLLEGE: $1k → 13%ALLEGHENY COLLEGE: $1k → 14%WYOMING VALLEY HEALTH & ED FND: $1k → 15%PRESBYTERIAN MEDICAL CENTER: $11k → 22%ITHACA COLLEGE: $1k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF SCRANTON: $1k → 13%LUZERNE COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $1k → 15%TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVAN: $11k → 22%UNIVERSITY OF SCRANTON: $1k → 13%PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY: $1k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF THE SCIENCES: $1k → 22%UNIVERSITY OF SCRANTON: $1k → 13%PENN STATE HAZLETON CAMPUS: $1k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF THE SCIENCES: $1k → 22%WYOMING VALLEY HEALTH & ED FND: $1k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF THE SCIENCES: $1k → 22%PENN STATE HAZLETON CAMPUS: $1k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $1k → 22%UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $1k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$269k · 29 repeat orgs$45k to everyone else

29 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
5

Total granted

$269k
$22k

Still filing today

48%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $22k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PM
    PRESBYTERIAN MEDICAL CENTER OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA HEALTH SYSTEM
    3× · 2020–2025 · $54k · revenue +46%
  • WU
    WILKES UNIVERSITY
    7× · 2019–2025 · $23k · revenue +9%
  • LC
    LACKAWANNA COLLEGE
    7× · 2019–2025 · $8k · revenue +42%

Funded once

  • PM
    PRESBYTERIAN MEDICAL CENTER OF THE UNIVE
    one grant, 2024 · $16k
  • CC
    COMMUNITY COLLEGE OF RHODE ISLAND
    one grant, 2024 · $2k
  • CH
    CRAFTON HILLS COLLEGE
    one grant, 2024 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Endicott College

Endicott college offers students a vibrant academic environment that remains true to its founding principle of integrating professional and liberal arts with experiential learning. for more information see schedule o.

Education
2
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
3
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
4
Dickinson College

Dickinson college provides a useful, innovative and interdisciplinary education in the liberal arts and sciences to prepare students to lead rich and fulfilling lives of engaged global citizenship

Education
5
Monmouth University Inc

See schedule omonmouth university is a comprehensive institution of higher education committed to excellence and integrity in teaching, scholarship and service. through its offerings in liberal arts, sciences, and professional programs,…

Education
6
Seton Hill University

Comprehensive institution of higher learning providing undergraduate and graduate student education.

Education
7
Lewis & Clark College

Lewis & clark is a premier private higher education institution offering an exceptional education in an inclusive environment. by fostering critical thinking, innovation, creativity, civic engagement, and leadership, both inside and…

Education
8
Fairleigh Dickinson University

Fairleigh dickinson university is a center of academic excellence dedicated to the preparation of world citizens through global education. the university strives to provide students with the multi-disciplinary, intercultural, and ethical…

Education
9
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
10
St Marys University of Minnesota

Enriched by the lasallian catholic heritage, saint mary's university of minnesota awakens, nurtures, and empowers learners to ethical lives of service and leadership.

Education
11
Chatham University

Chatham university prepares women and men to be world ready: to build lives of purpose and value and fulfilling work. (see continuation on schedule o)in addition to appropriate professional skills and liberal arts learning, chatham…

Education
12
Georgian Court University

Georgian court university (gcu), provides a comprehensive liberal arts education and is open to students of all faiths, delivers a curriculum that promotes scholarship, service, and personal development.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Allegheny College; the most unlike its peers is Presbyterian Medical Center of the University of Pennsylvania Health System. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
14/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

YALE UNIVERSITY: $39,818 · OtherYALE UNIVERSITYYALE UNIVERSITY: $31,951 · OtherYALE UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF PENNA TRUSTEES: $21,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF PENNA TRUSTEESPRESBYTERIAN MEDICAL CENTER OF THE UNIVE: $16,335 · OtherPRESBYTERIAN MEDICAL CENTER OF THE UNIVEPENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY: $10,800 · OtherPENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITYKUTZTOWN UNIVERSITY: $9,600 · OtherWYOMING VALLEY HEALTH & ED FND: $7,000 · Other+15 more: $48,000 · Other+15 moreTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $56,569 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVAN…WILKES UNIVERSITY: $22,800 · EducationWILKES UNIVERSITYLACKAWANNA COLLEGE: $8,400 · EducationLACKAWANNA COLLEGEMISERICORDIA UNIVERSITY: $4,800 · EducationITHACA COLLEGE: $4,800 · EducationUniversity of Scranton: $4,800 · EducationBucknell University: $4,800 · EducationELIZABETHTOWN COLLEGE: $4,800 · EducationDREXEL UNIVERSITY: $4,800 · Education+5 more: $14,400 · Education+5 morePRESBYTERIAN MEDICAL CENTER OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA HEALTH SYSTEM: $54,234 · HealthPRESBYTERIAN MED…
Other$184,504Education$130,969Health$54,234

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $56,569 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPRESBYTERIAN MEDICAL CENTER OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA HEALTH SYSTEM: $54,234 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWILKES UNIVERSITY: $22,800 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetLACKAWANNA COLLEGE: $8,400 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMISERICORDIA UNIVERSITY: $4,800 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPOINT PARK UNIVERSITY: $4,800 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetITHACA COLLEGE: $4,800 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Scranton: $4,800 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBucknell University: $4,800 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetELIZABETHTOWN COLLEGE: $4,800 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDREXEL UNIVERSITY: $4,800 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMarywood University: $3,600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetALLEGHENY COLLEGE: $3,600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $3,600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSUSQUEHANNA UNIVERSITY: $2,400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJOHNSON COLLEGE: $1,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds PRESBYTERIAN MEDICAL CENTER OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA HEALTH SYSTEM ↗
  • Who funds WILKES UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds LACKAWANNA COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds MISERICORDIA UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds POINT PARK UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds ITHACA COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds University of Scranton ↗
  • Who funds Bucknell University ↗
  • Who funds ELIZABETHTOWN COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds DREXEL UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Marywood University ↗
  • Who funds ALLEGHENY COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH ↗
  • Who funds SUSQUEHANNA UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds JOHNSON COLLEGE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Verizon FoundationW W & Lucretia Hafer …The Hawk Family Found…The Luzerne FoundationIbm International Fou…Sordoni Family Founda…Snayberger Memorial F…The 1994 Charles B De…Moses Taylor Foundati…Allone CharitiesWilliam G McGowan Cha…First Community Found…
Verizon FoundationNJ17.2× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Verizon Foundation · W W & Lucretia Hafer Scholarship Tuw · The Hawk Family Foundation · The Luzerne Foundation · Ibm International Foundation · Sordoni Family Foundation · Snayberger Memorial Fdn (Pf) · The 1994 Charles B Degenstein Fdn · Moses Taylor Foundation Inc · Allone Charities · William G McGowan Charitable Fund · First Community Foundation Partnership

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Stoddart Harry T Uw funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Stoddart Harry T Uw. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Stoddart Harry T Uw’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home