· Private foundation
Snayberger Memorial Fdn (Pf)
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k57 grants · $114k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $71k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY | $25,128 |
| LEBANON VALLEY COLLEGE | $17,880 |
| COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY OF PA | $16,913 |
| WEST CHESTER UNIVERSITY | $10,631 |
| KINGS COLLEGE | $8,698 |
| INDIANA UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA | $6,282 |
| EAST STROUDSBURG UNIVERSITY | $6,282 |
| UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH | $5,798 |
| GEORGE D KELLER MEMORIAL ASSOCIATION | $5,000 |
| KUTZTOWN UNIVERSITY | $4,832 |
| HARRISBURG UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE & TECHN | $4,349 |
| NORTHEAST COLLEGE OF HEALTH SCIENCE | $4,349 |
| GETTYSBURG COLLEGE | $3,866 |
| PENNSYLVANIA COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY | $3,383 |
| THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY | $3,383 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–25, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +7% since the first grant, against +3% for the ones you funded once.
60 repeat relationships — 49 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- LVLEBANON VALLEY COLLEGE3× · 2023–2025 · $34k · revenue +15%
- KCKING'S COLLEGE3× · 2023–2025 · $21k · revenue +0%
- NCNORTHEAST COLLEGE OF HEALTH SCIENCES3× · 2023–2025 · $13k · revenue +16%
Funded once
- BUBLOOMSBURG UNIVERSITYone grant, 2023 · $20k
- TSTHADDEUS STEVENS COLLEGEone grant, 2024 · $5k
- GSGIRL SCOUTS IN THE HEART OF PAone grant, 2023 · $4k · revenue +1%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.
Dickinson college provides a useful, innovative and interdisciplinary education in the liberal arts and sciences to prepare students to lead rich and fulfilling lives of engaged global citizenship
Comprehensive institution of higher learning providing undergraduate and graduate student education.
Wesleyan university is dedicated to providing an education in liberal arts by building a diverse, energetic community of students, faculty, and staff who value independence of mind and generosity of spirit. see additional description in…
Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.
Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…
Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…
Delaware state university is a public, comprehensive, 1890 land-grant institution that offers access and opportunity to diverse populations from delaware, the nation, and the world. (continued on schedule o.)building on its heritage as a…
The trustees of the university of pennsylvania (the "university") sees itself as having a public service mission. in such regard, the university aims to provide a rich and diverse educational environment for its students; to pioneer…
Chatham university prepares women and men to be world ready: to build lives of purpose and value and fulfilling work. (see continuation on schedule o)in addition to appropriate professional skills and liberal arts learning, chatham…
Muhlenberg aims to help students become independent thinkers who are intellectually agile, characterized by a zest for reasoned and civil debate, knowledgeable about the achievements and traditions of diverse civilizations and cultures,…
Mcdaniel college is a diverse student-centered community committed to excellence in the liberal arts & sciences and professional studies with careful mentoring and attention to the individual. mcdaniel changes lives. we challenge students…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is King's College and the most unlike its peers is Majestic Theater Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 48 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
43 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 43 of the 94 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds LEBANON VALLEY COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds KING'S COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds NORTHEAST COLLEGE OF HEALTH SCIENCES ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH ↗
- Who funds URSINUS COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds GROVE CITY COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE ↗
- Who funds DESALES UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds Bucknell University ↗
- Who funds LYCOMING COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds SCHUYLKILL WOMEN IN CRISIS ↗
- Who funds Temple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education ↗
- Who funds SUSQUEHANNA UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds CEDAR CREST COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds GETTYSBURG COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds CHILD DEVELOPMENT INC ↗
- Who funds GIRL SCOUTS IN THE HEART OF PA ↗
- Who funds WILKES UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds DELAWARE VALLEY UNIVERSITY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Benevolent Association of Pottsville · Ppl Foundation · Ben D Spagolio Charitable Trust · Melvin H and Thelma N Jenkins Scholarship · Comerford Mary Tw Charitable (Pf) · Schuylkill Area Community Foundation · Will S & Anna S Fox Foundation · The Donald B and Dorothy L Stabler Foundation · Verizon Foundation · Aetna Foundation Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Snayberger Memorial Fdn (Pf) funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- University of Delaware — 30% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.