Skip to content

· Private foundation

Stoddard Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$380k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
10
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$1.4MHuman Services$245kRecreation & Sports$111kEnvironment$100kPhilanthropy$100kFood & Nutrition$66kPublic Safety & Disaster$65kHealth$43kOther$0
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k10 grants · $180k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $200k
$20,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$6.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LDS PHILANTHROPIES$100,000
LITTLE TRAVERSE NATURE CONSERVANCY$50,000
NORTHWEST COLLEGE FOUNDATION$50,000
SOUTHERN VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY$40,000
THE SALVATION ARMY$20,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$20,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS LOCAL$20,000
MANNA FOOD PROJECT$15,000
MANNAHOUSE FOOD PANTRY$15,000
SHRINERS CHILDREN'S$12,500
WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT$12,500
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL$12,500
TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$12,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $45k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $25k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $20k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
WY
OH
UT
WV
VA
MD
KS
TN
DC
HI
OK
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 9% of Stoddard Family Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Stoddard Family Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 10% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

52%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 8 repeat orgs$1.0M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +22% since the first grant, against -2% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
10

Total granted

$1.1M
$804k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
-2%

Still filing today

63%
30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 36% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $243k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SV
    SOUTHERN VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY
    6× · 2017–2024 · $432k · revenue +102%
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    2× · 2023–2024 · $45k · revenue +22%
  • STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION
    2× · 2023–2024 · $38k · revenue +50%

Funded once

  • MU
    Madonna University
    one grant, 2017 · $250k · revenue +8%
  • YF
    YMCA FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $200k
  • BY
    BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2018 · $165k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
2
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
3
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
4
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
5
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
6
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
President-Board of Trustees Santa Clara College

Scu is a catholic and jesuit institution that makes student learning its central focus, promotes faculty and staff learning in its various forms, and exhibits organizational learning.

Education
8
Wentworth Institute of Technology Inc

Wentworth institute of technology is a nationally recognized private coeducational and residential university of higher education with a mission to empower, inspire and innovate through experiential learning with a core purpose of career…

Education
9
Benedictine University

Benedictine University is an inclusive academic community dedicated to teaching and learning, scholarship and service, truth and justice, as inspired by the Catholic intellectual tradition, the social teaching of the Church, and the…

Education
10
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
12
University of the Sciences in Philadelphia

University of the sciences prepares students to become leaders, innovators, and skilled practitioners in the sciences, the health professions, and related disciplines. we deliver excellence in teaching, research, and service through a safe…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Cody Cupboard. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
9/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NORTHWEST COLLEGE FOUNDATION & ALUMNI: $350,000 · OtherNORTHWEST COLLEGE FOUNDATION & ALUMNIYMCA FOUNDATION: $200,000 · OtherYMCA FOUNDATIONBRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY: $165,000 · OtherBRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITYBRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY - PHILANTHROPIES: $118,700 · OtherBRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY - PHILANTHROPIESBRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY-HAWAII: $100,000 · OtherBRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY-HAWAIILITTLE TRAVERSE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $100,000 · OtherLITTLE TRAVERSE NATURE CONSERVANCYLDS PHILANTHROPIES: $100,000 · OtherLDS PHILANTHROPIESNORTHWEST COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $50,000 · Other+10 more: $167,500 · Other+10 moreSOUTHERN VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY: $432,000 · EducationSOUTHERN VIRGINIA UNIVERSITYMadonna University: $250,000 · EducationMadonna UniversitySTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $37,500 · Education+1 more: $15,000 · EducationAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $45,000 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $12,500 · Human ServicesBuffalo Bill Memorial Association: $25,000 · Arts & CultureST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $12,500 · Health
Other$1,351,200Education$734,500Human Services$57,500Arts & Culture$25,000Health$12,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSOUTHERN VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY: $432,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetMadonna University: $250,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNORTHWEST COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $45,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $37,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MANNA FOOD PROJECT INC DBA - THE MANNA FOOD PROJECT: $28,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetBuffalo Bill Memorial Association: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CODY CUPBOARD: $23,000 over 2y, 7.9% of budgetThe University of Tulsa: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $12,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $12,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SOUTHERN VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Madonna University ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWEST COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE MANNA FOOD PROJECT INC DBA - THE MANNA FOOD PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds Buffalo Bill Memorial Association ↗
  • Who funds THE CODY CUPBOARD ↗
  • Who funds The University of Tulsa ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN10.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Stoddard Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Stoddard Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • The University of Tulsa: 5% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Stoddard Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph