Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Stinehart Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$212k
Granted FY2025still arriving
25
Grants FY2025still arriving
11
States reached
$67k
Largest
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192025.

Religion$462kEducation$129kHealth$57kCivil Rights$20kInternational$18kRecreation & Sports$11kFood & Nutrition$4kHuman Services$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k19 grants · $55k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $91k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $67k
$5,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UCI FOUNDATION$66,500
CHRIST LIFE MINISTRIES$27,400
GRACE FELLOWSHIP CHURCH$24,000
STANDING STONE MINISTRY$17,278
PRACTICING THE WAY$12,456
EVERY GENERATION MINISTRIES$10,000
HOAG HOSPITAL$5,000
FREE WHEELCHAIR MISSION$5,000
ELAM MINISTRIES$5,000
CHILDREN'S HUNGER FUND$5,000
COMMON GROUND$5,000
STANFORD UNIVERSITY$5,000
THE BIBLE PROJECT$5,000
NORTHRISE UNIVERSITY INITIATIVE$4,500
ALLEGRO ORGANIZATIONAL SOLUTIONS$3,217
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–25, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MOVEMENTS OF GRACE: $2k → 10%MOVEMENTS OF GRACE: $1k → 10%MOVEMENTS OF GRACE: $310 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
NY
OR
CA
CO
VA
MD
AZ
NC
HI
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$690k · 26 repeat orgs$24k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +42% since the first grant, against +11% for the ones you funded once.

26 repeat relationships — 20 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
13

Total granted

$690k
$15k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
+11%

Still filing today

65%
46%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthReligionEducationInternationalHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SS
    STANDING STONE MINISTRIES INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $115k · revenue +210%
  • CL
    CHRIST LIFE MINISTRIES
    7× · 2019–2025 · $104k · revenue +13%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE FOUNDATION
    2× · 2024–2025 · $78k · revenue +84%

Funded once

  • TM
    THE MAVEN PROJECT
    one grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue 0%
  • GC
    GIVING CHILDREN HOPE
    one grant, 2020 · $2k · revenue -40%
  • PC
    PEDIATRIC CANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE
    one grant, 2024 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

2
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
3
Global Media Outreach

Leveraging technology to invite all people to know jesus christ as savior and grow in a personal relationship with him.

Religion
4
Youth for Christ International Ministries

As part of the body of Christ, to see that every young person in every people group in every nation has the opportunity to make an informed decision to be a follower of Jesus Christ and become a part of the local church.

Religion
5
Biglife International Inc

Biglife international inc. empowers believers worldwide to reach and disciple their own people for jesus christ.

Recreation & Sports
6
Global Outreach International Inc

To get the good news to every nation this generation by showing and sharing god's love by providing opportunities and supporting christian missionaries in over fifty seven countries around the world.

International
7
Christian Healthcare Ministries Inc

To glorify god, show christian love, and experience god's presence as christians share each other's medical bills.

Religion
8
Jewish Voice Ministries Intl

To proclaim the gospel, grow the messianic jewish community and engage the church concerning israel and the jewish people. this is done through education, evangelism and being a movement leader, all with excellence in order to transform…

9
Christian World Outreach

Providing responsible evangelism, leadership, development, and humanitarian assistance.

Employment
10
Corus International Inc

TO MANAGE AN INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT, HEALTH, AND RELIEF FOCUSED FAMILY OF ORGANIZATIONS HELPING PEOPLE AND COMMUNITIES LIFT THEMSELVES OUT OF POVERTY, SUPPORT WELL-BEING OF INDIVIDUALS, FAMILIES AND COMMUNITIES, AND PROVIDE…

Human Services
11
Los Angeles Mission Inc

The los angeles mission breaks the cycle of homelessness and poverty, by stabilizing people in a safe and spiritual environment, connecting them to solutions and walking with them on their journey.

Housing & Shelter
12
Zimzam Global

Equip and develop leaders and church planters (includes evangelism, discipleship, leadership development and church planting). empower children and, through them, next generation churches. engage communities through the church as a…

Religion

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Every Generation Ministries Inc and the most unlike its peers is Beacon of Light. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyIndependent K-8 SchoolsFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Pregnancy Support ServicesCommunity Health CentersLegal Aid & Immigration Ser…Cancer Support OrganizationsChristian Missionary Organi…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%11%<5yr15%4%5–10yr20%15%10–20yr17%26%20–35yr11%22%35–55yr13%22%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%8%<5yr15%3%5–10yr20%6%10–20yr17%32%20–35yr11%31%35–55yr13%21%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 11% of your grantees by number, and just 8% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/31
the rest of the field
14%
26,003/186,947

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/27
Grantees still filing
20/27
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

GRACE FELLOWSHIP CHURCH — $128,060 · OtherGRACE FELLOWSHIP CHURCHCHRIST LIFE MINISTRIES — $104,400 · OtherCHRIST LIFE MINISTRIESPRACTICING THE WAY — $27,312 · OtherPRACTICING THE WAYIndividual grant recipient — $21,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCOMMON GROUND — $20,000 · OtherCOMMON GROUND+15 more — $46,200 · Other+15 moreSTANDING STONE MINISTRIES INC — $114,576 · HealthSTANDING STONE MINISTRIES…FREE WHEELCHAIR MISSION — $20,000 · HealthFREE WHEELCHAIR MISSIONBEACON OF LIGHT — $10,800 · HealthBEACON OF LIGHTCYSTINOSIS RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $10,000 · HealthCYSTINOSIS RESEARCH FOUND…+2 more — $5,250 · HealthUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE FOUNDATION — $77,500 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF CALI…NORTHRISE UNIVERSITY INITIATIVE — $26,500 · EducationNORTHRISE UNIVERSI…THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $8,500 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUST…UNIVERSITY OF THE NATIONS KONA INC — $5,400 · Education+1 more — $1,000 · EducationEVERY GENERATION MINISTRIES INC — $42,500 · ReligionEVERY GENER…Elam Ministries — $15,000 · ReligionElam Minist…BIBLEPROJECT — $13,000 · ReligionBIBLEPROJEC…+1 more — $1,000 · ReligionCHILDREN'S HUNGER FUND — $6,500 · InternationalALLEGRO ORGANIZATIONAL SOLUTIONS INC — $3,217 · InternationalWORLD VISION INC — $2,795 · InternationalCompassion International Incorporated — $2,772 · InternationalGIVING CHILDREN HOPE — $1,500 · InternationalMOVEMENTS OF GRACE INC — $3,788 · Human ServicesAGAPE CHILDREN'S MINISTRY INC — $2,700 · Human ServicesFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES — $3,100 · Youth DevelopmentTEEN LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION — $1,000 · Youth Development
Other$346,972Health$160,626Education$118,900Religion$71,500International$16,784Human Services$6,488Youth Development$4,100

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSTANDING STONE MINISTRIES INC — $114,576 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetCHRIST LIFE MINISTRIES — $104,400 over 7y, 5.3% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE FOUNDATION — $77,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEVERY GENERATION MINISTRIES INC — $42,500 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetNORTHRISE UNIVERSITY INITIATIVE — $26,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetFREE WHEELCHAIR MISSION — $20,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetElam Ministries — $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBIBLEPROJECT — $13,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBEACON OF LIGHT — $10,800 over 5y, 2.1% of budgetCYSTINOSIS RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMARINERS CHRISTIAN SCHOOL — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $8,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S HUNGER FUND — $6,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF THE NATIONS KONA INC — $5,400 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MAVEN PROJECT — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMOVEMENTS OF GRACE INC — $3,788 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES — $3,100 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD VISION INC — $2,795 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAGAPE CHILDREN'S MINISTRY INC — $2,700 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetGIVING CHILDREN HOPE — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTEEN LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWESTMONT COLLEGE — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPEDIATRIC CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHOC FOUNDATION — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds STANDING STONE MINISTRIES INC
  • Who funds CHRIST LIFE MINISTRIES
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds EVERY GENERATION MINISTRIES INC
  • Who funds NORTHRISE UNIVERSITY INITIATIVE
  • Who funds FREE WHEELCHAIR MISSION
  • Who funds Elam Ministries
  • Who funds BIBLEPROJECT
  • Who funds BEACON OF LIGHT
  • Who funds CYSTINOSIS RESEARCH FOUNDATION
  • Who funds MARINERS CHRISTIAN SCHOOL
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HUNGER FUND
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF THE NATIONS KONA INC
  • Who funds THE MAVEN PROJECT
  • Who funds MOVEMENTS OF GRACE INC
  • Who funds ALLEGRO ORGANIZATIONAL SOLUTIONS INC
  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES
  • Who funds WORLD VISION INC
  • Who funds Compassion International Incorporated
  • Who funds AGAPE CHILDREN'S MINISTRY INC
  • Who funds GIVING CHILDREN HOPE
  • Who funds TEEN LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION
  • Who funds WESTMONT COLLEGE
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE
  • Who funds PEDIATRIC CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Cashion FoundationCA22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Cashion Foundation · Orange County Community Foundation · Christian Community Foundation Inc · Greater Horizons · Servant's Heart Foundation Inc · Mark H and Blanche M Harrington Foundation · Servant Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation · The Bowie Family Foundation · The Devto Support Foundation · International Generosity Foundation Trust

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Stinehart Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph