Skip to content

· Private foundation

Stibnite Foundation Co

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$55k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Education$42kRecreation & Sports$32kPublic Safety & Disaster$28kHuman Services$28kYouth Development$19kFood & Nutrition$18kPhilanthropy$17kHealth$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CASCADE AQUATIC AND REC CENTER$7,157
CASCADE RURAL FIRE DISTRICT$5,000
CASCADE CULTURE ART CENTER$5,000
WCM YOUTH ADVOCACY COALITION$5,000
CITY OF NEW MEADOWS$4,500
CASCADE SCHOOL DISTRICT$4,343
CASCADE SCHOOL DISTRICT$3,300
COURAGEOUS KIDS CLIMBING$2,500
CASCADE FOOD PANTRY$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,500
VALLEY COUNTY 4-H$2,500
MCCALL FOLKLORE SOCIETY$2,000
MCCALL YOUTH HOCKEY ASSOC$2,000
MCCALL MUSIC SOCIETY$1,500
NEW MEADOWS FARMERS MARKET$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $23k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%RISE UP 2 THRIVE: $5k → 8%RISE UP 2 THRIVE: $4k → 8%SHEPHERD'S HOME: $9k → 8%IGNITE IDAHO FAMILY RESOURCES CENTE: $5k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

58%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$160k · 19 repeat orgs$118k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +39% since the first grant, against +26% for those funded once.

19 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
31

Total granted

$160k
$83k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+26%

Still filing today

16%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 37% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsCommunity ImprovementFood & NutritionAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CO
    CITY OF NEW MEADOWS
    4× · 2020–2025 · $18k
  • CE
    COUNCIL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
    2× · 2020–2022 · $17k
  • YC
    YPAC CORP
    3× · 2020–2022 · $17k · 64% of their budget

Funded once

  • SH
    SHEPHERDS HOME INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $9k · revenue +138%
  • WC
    WEST CENTRAL MOUNTAINS YAC
    one grant, 2024 · $7k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
McCall Senior Citizens Inc

Provide nutritious meals to elderly, handicapped and shut-ins. Provide recreationa and education for senior citizens and handicapped. ... Human services, Special population support, Senior services, Age groups, Adults, Seniors,…

Human Services
2
Idaho Wild Sheep Foundation Inc

Wild sheep preservation

Animals
3
South Fork Boise River Association

Provide community improvements for the rural idaho mountain communities of pine & featherville, idaho.

Human Services
4
Beaverhead Trails Coalition

Enhancement and development of trails on public lands in Beaverhead County

Environment
5
Valley County Economic Develop Dba West Central Mtn Eco Develo

Economic development for the west central mountain idaho region

Community Improvement
6
Falls Creek Wildlands and Trails

Falls Creek Wildlands and Trails FCWT promotes conservation stewardship and responsible recreation in the Falls Creek area through trail development and maintenance environmental restoration and preservation projects and educational…

Environment
7
Idaho Forest Restoration Partnership
Environment
8
Wallace District Arts Council Inc

Provide musical and artistic performances in rural North Idaho, mainly in Wallace, Idaho.

—
9
Methow Valley Sports Trail Association
Environment
10
Methow Valley Trails Collaborative

Enhancing sustainable trail experiences in the Methow Valley.

Environment
11
Southwest Idaho Mountain Biking Association Inc

To create, protect, and sustain a world-class multiuse trail network that embodies inclusivity and enhances the outdoor experience for all in Southwest Idaho.

Recreation & Sports
12
McCall Ultra Sled Dog Challenge Llc

The mccall ultra sled dog challenge is a sled dog race organized for charitable purposes. specifically the race located in mcall id provides a sporting event for mushers and is a uniaque and important family activity and volunteer…

Recreation & Sports
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mccall Music Society Inc; the most unlike its peers is Meadows Valley Community Found. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 61 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/15
Grantees still filing
8/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CITY OF NEW MEADOWS: $18,000 · OtherCITY OF NEW MEADOWSCOUNCIL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $17,000 · OtherCOUNCIL ELEMENTARY SCHOOLCASCADE SCHOOL DISTRICT: $15,393 · OtherCASCADE SCHOOL DISTRICTMCCALL YOUTH HOCKEY ASSOCIATION: $12,000 · OtherMCCALL YOUTH HOCKEY ASSOCIATIONHORIZONS LIFESYTLE AND EDUCATION TE: $11,450 · OtherYAC IDAHO WEST CENTRAL MTNS YOUTH A: $8,000 · Other+44 more: $137,607 · Other+44 moreRISE UP 2 THRIVE INC: $9,000 · Human ServicesRISE UP 2…SHEPHERDS HOME INC: $8,937 · Human ServicesSHEPHERDS…IGNITE IDAHO FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $5,000 · Human ServicesIGNITE ID…YPAC CORP: $16,500 · PhilanthropyMEADOWS VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUND: $900 · PhilanthropyIdaho Trails Association: $5,600 · Recreation & SportsMCCALL WINTER SPORTS CLUB INC: $2,000 · Recreation & SportsCASCADE FOOD PANTRY: $5,000 · Food & NutritionPayette Lakes Community Association Inc: $2,400 · Community ImprovementVALLEY COUNTY PATHWAYS INC: $1,500 · Community ImprovementSNOWDON WILDLIFE SANCTUARY: $1,000 · Animals
Other$219,450Human Services$22,937Philanthropy$17,400Recreation & Sports$7,600Food & Nutrition$5,000Community Improvement$3,900Animals$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYPAC CORP: $16,500 over 3y, 64% of budgetRISE UP 2 THRIVE INC: $9,000 over 2y, 3.1% of budgetSHEPHERDS HOME INC: $8,937 over 1y, 6.4% of budgetIdaho Trails Association: $5,600 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetIGNITE IDAHO FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCASCADE FOOD PANTRY: $5,000 over 3y, 6.4% of budgetPayette Lakes Community Association Inc: $2,400 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetMCCALL FOLKLORE SOCIETY INC: $2,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetMCCALL WINTER SPORTS CLUB INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetVALLEY COUNTY PATHWAYS INC: $1,500 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetMCCALL MUSIC SOCIETY INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetROSE Advocates Inc: $1,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSNOWDON WILDLIFE SANCTUARY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds YPAC CORP ↗
  • Who funds RISE UP 2 THRIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds SHEPHERDS HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds Idaho Trails Association ↗
  • Who funds IGNITE IDAHO FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds CASCADE FOOD PANTRY ↗
  • Who funds Payette Lakes Community Association Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Idaho Community Foundation IncID23.5× affinity9 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Idaho Community Foundation Inc · Laura Moore Cunningham Foundation Inc · St Luke's Health System Ltd · Rotary Club of McCall Foundation Inc · Claude R & Ethel B Whittenberger Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Stibnite Foundation Co funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Stibnite Foundation Co. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Stibnite Foundation Co?

    Find your warmest path to Stibnite Foundation Co through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 61 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Stibnite’s filings →

    More from the funding graph