· Private foundation
Stibnite Foundation Co
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HORIZONS LIFESYTLE AND EDUCATION TE | $8,950 |
| WEST CENTRAL MOUNTAINS YAC | $7,150 |
| IGNITE IDAHO FAMILY RESOURCES CENTE | $5,000 |
| YELLOW PINE AREA COALITION | $4,000 |
| RISE UP 2 THRIVE | $4,000 |
| IDAHO TRAILS ASSOCIATION | $2,000 |
| MEADOWS VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $900 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $23k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
16 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 47% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $17k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CECOUNCIL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL2× · 2020–2022 · $17k
- YCYPAC CORP3× · 2020–2022 · $17k · 64% of their budget
- COCITY OF NEW MEADOWS3× · 2020–2023 · $14k
Funded once
- MYMCCALL YOUTH HOCKEY ASSOCIATIONone grant, 2022 · $10k
- SHSHEPHERDS HOME INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $9k · revenue +138%
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2022 · $6k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Enhancement and development of trails on public lands in Beaverhead County
Provide community improvements for the rural idaho mountain communities of pine & featherville, idaho.
Wild sheep preservation
Provide a safe environment for seniors to meet and socialize.
Domestic violence prevention, shelter, and education
To provide meals, health related services, social activities and other services to the local community with a focus on seniors.
Trails Utah is dedicated to trails advocacy, planning, funding, and construction in needed areas throughout the state.
Economic development for the west central mountain idaho region
To deliver meals to shut-ins who cannot or should not prepare meals for themselves.
To provide nutritious meals and social activities at the center as well as home delivered meals and transportation for seniors
Provides fire protection services for rural homes and businesses in campbell county, tn. assists with forest fires and rescue operations in east tennessee.
Cycling
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cascade Food Pantry and the most unlike its peers is Snowdon Wildlife Sanctuary. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 50 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds YPAC CORP ↗
- Who funds RISE UP 2 THRIVE INC ↗
- Who funds SHEPHERDS HOME INC ↗
- Who funds Idaho Trails Association ↗
- Who funds IGNITE IDAHO FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds CASCADE FOOD PANTRY ↗
- Who funds Payette Lakes Community Association Inc ↗
- Who funds MCCALL WINTER SPORTS CLUB INC ↗
- Who funds ROSE Advocates Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Idaho Community Foundation Inc · Laura Moore Cunningham Foundation Inc · St Luke's Health System Ltd · Rotary Club of McCall Foundation Inc · Claude R & Ethel B Whittenberger Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Stibnite Foundation Co funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Stibnite Foundation Co?
Find your warmest path to Stibnite Foundation Co through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.