· Private foundation
Stewart Laura May T U W
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k14 grants · $78k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HELP - HOPE EMPATHY LOVE & PRAYER | $10,000 |
| BEAUMONT EDUCATIONAL SUPPORT TEAM | $8,746 |
| SAN GORGONIO PASS HISTORICAL SOCIETY | $7,111 |
| LIFEPOINT CHURCH | $7,000 |
| FAITH IN ACTION OF THE SAN GORGONIO PASS | $6,576 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SAN GORGONIO PASS | $6,000 |
| BANNING PTNRS FOR REVITALIZED COMMUNITY | $6,000 |
| CULTURAL ALLIANCE OF THE PASS | $6,000 |
| CAROL'S KITCHEN INC | $6,000 |
| PLAYHOUSE BOWL ASSOCIATION INC | $6,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,971 |
| SOROPTIMIST INTERNATIONAL OF THE AMERICA | $5,956 |
| AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY WOMEN | $2,654 |
| DEANN'S PAASS KIDS | $2,299 |
| FRIENDS OF THE BANNING LIBRARY | $1,371 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $47k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
22 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $22k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CKCAROL'S KITCHEN INC6× · 2020–2025 · $35k · revenue +42%
- BEBEAUMONT EDUCATIONAL SUPPORT TEAM3× · 2023–2025 · $16k · revenue +14%
- HFHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC2× · 2020–2021 · $7k · revenue +36%
Funded once
- BVBeaumont-Cherry Valley Recreation and Park Improvement Corporationone grant, 2021 · $6k · revenue -99%
- BGBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE SAN GORGONIO Pone grant, 2020 · $6k
- BSBANNING STAGECOACH DAYS ASSOCIATIONone grant, 2020 · $6k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To operate a boys and girls club facility and after-school and summer camp programs for all area children regardless of ability to pay in the Five Cities area of San Luis Obispo County.
To provide the finest golfing and dining experience in southern california to the club members and their guests.
The club's mission is to enable all young people, specially those who need it most, to reach their potential as productive, caring, responsible citizens.
We train and equip volunteers to maintain forest and wilderness areas for recreation use by the public, working in partnership with the USFS. We patrol the wilderness for permit compliance, and we educate the public in using the recreation…
To inspire and enable all young people to realize their full potential as responsible and caring citizens.
Preserve, protect and promote the history of San Benito County.
Seeking to put god's love into action, habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope to realize our visions of a world where everyone has a decent place to live. san gabriel valley habitat for humanity…
To save and enhance the lives of the young people of our community, especially those with economic and or social needs, by offering a safe haven and meaningful youth development programs provided by a caring and qualified staff.
Serve the communitys youth
To ensure that all children and youth, especially those who need us most, are offered opportunities to realize their full potential as responsible, caring, and productive citizens of a richly diverse world.
To enable all young people to reach their full potential as productive, caring, responsible citizens. to serve youth in sierra vista by providing them a safe, friendly, healthy and structured environment where they can have fun, learn and…
To support the boys & girls of santa fe, san miguel and torrance counties through after school programs, food service and education.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Girl Scouts of San Gorgonio Council and the most unlike its peers is Playhouse Bowl Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 23 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 30% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 18% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CAROL'S KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds Cultural Alliance of the Pass ↗
- Who funds PLAYHOUSE BOWL ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds BEAUMONT EDUCATIONAL SUPPORT TEAM ↗
- Who funds SAN GORGONIO PASS HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds FAITH IN ACTION OF THE SAN GOR ↗
- Who funds HELP INC HOPE EMPATHY LOVE AND PRAYER ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds Beaumont-Cherry Valley Recreation and Park Improvement Corporation ↗
- Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF SAN GORGONIO COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds SOROPTIMIST HOUSE OF HOPE ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE SAN GORGONIO PASS ↗
- Who funds HIGHLAND ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY WOMEN INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Inland Empire Community Foundation · Sempra Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Stewart Laura May T U W funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.