Skip to content

· Private foundation

Steward Shipping Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$64k
Granted FY2020
20
Grants FY2020
9
States reached
$22k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$534kEducation$117kYouth Development$4kHealth$4kInternational$1kOther$0
02FY2020 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2020

  • Under $10k19 grants · $42k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $22k
$2,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CRU (CAMPUS CRUSADE)$22,100
PARACLETE$7,000
LIGHTHOUSE$4,000
PINEHAVEN$3,000
PRISON FELLOWSHIP$3,000
PRISON FELLOWSHIP$3,000
JEWS FOR JESUS$2,000
MILE HIGH MINISTRIES$2,000
CAMINO ALLIANCE$2,000
NOVO$2,000
HELP FOR CHRISTIAN NATIONALS$2,000
BIBLE INSTITUTE OF HAWAII$2,000
WYCLIFF$2,000
INTERVARSITY$1,500
PIONEERS$1,200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–20, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%MILE HIGH MINISTRIES: $2k → 12%MILE HIGH MINISTRIES: $2k → 12%MILE HIGH MINISTRIES: $2k → 12%MILE HIGH MINISTRIES: $2k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
IL
WI
OH
NJ
CA
CO
VA
AZ
NC
HI
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$272k · 20 repeat orgs$8k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2020, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
3

Total granted

$272k
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-19%
0%

Still filing today

25%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20
ReligionHuman ServicesEducationYouth DevelopmentHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRIST INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $117k
  • P
    PARACLETE
    4× · 2017–2020 · $22k
  • PF
    PRISON FELLOWSHIP
    4× · 2017–2020 · $15k

Funded once

  • CC
    CHRISTIAN COLLEGE OF SOUTHERN AFRIC
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
  • TI
    The International Foundation
    one grant, 2019 · $600 · revenue -66%
  • CI
    CADENCE INTERNATIONAL
    one grant, 2018 · $500 · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Leadership Resources International

International missions: this organization is an international mission agency focusing on leadership development through teaching of the scriptures

Religion
2
International Impact Ministries in
Religion
3
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

—
4
International Leadership Institute

The international leadership institute (ili) changes history by accelerating the spread of the gospel through training and mobilizing leaders of leaders to reach their nations. ili accomplishes this purpose through cutting edge leadership…

Religion
5
Mission Without Borders International

The organization is dedicated to reaching people for christ through an international network of christians who journey with the poor and marginalized, bringing practical and spiritual support with hope of a better future,(continued on…

International
6
Global City Missions Initiative Incorporated

Global City Mission Initiative is dedicated to cross-cultural evanglism, disciplemaking, church planting among diverse diaspora populations in strategic cities reaching out evangelistically to start multiply churches, training believers to…

Religion
7
Missions International

Provide assistance to persons in foreign countries

International
8
Youth for Christ International Ministries

As part of the body of Christ, to see that every young person in every people group in every nation has the opportunity to make an informed decision to be a follower of Jesus Christ and become a part of the local church.

Religion
9
Lakelight Institute

Lakelight Institute equips Christians with timeless wisdom for modern life.

Religion
10
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
11
Missions Development International

MDI provides ministry leaders with high-caliber mentoring and innovative content to unleash their God-given potential.

International
12
International Biblical Training Inc

International Biblical Training is a teaching, training and equipping religious ministry. IBT staff provide theological teaching and training for the purpose of making Christian disciples who in turn train and disciple others in…

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cadence International; the most unlike its peers is The International Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
3/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRIST INC: $116,600 · OtherCAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRIST INCPARACLETE: $22,000 · OtherPARACLETEPRISON FELLOWSHIP: $15,000 · OtherPRISON FELLOWSHIPPINEHAVEN: $12,000 · OtherCAMINO ALLIANCE: $12,000 · OtherCHRISTIAN COMM DEV ASSN: $10,000 · Other+13 more: $55,900 · Other+13 moreTHE POTTER'S INN: $6,000 · ReligionMissionary Support Services Inc: $6,000 · ReligionMILE HIGH MINISTRIES: $8,000 · Human ServicesBIBLE INSTITUTE OF HAWAII: $8,000 · EducationYOUNG LIFE: $4,000 · Youth DevelopmentLighthouse: $4,000 · Health
Other$243,500Religion$12,000Human Services$8,000Education$8,000Youth Development$4,000Health$4,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMILE HIGH MINISTRIES: $8,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetBIBLE INSTITUTE OF HAWAII: $8,000 over 4y, 2.0% of budgetTHE POTTER'S INN: $6,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetMissionary Support Services Inc: $6,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLighthouse: $4,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetThe International Foundation: $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCADENCE INTERNATIONAL: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MILE HIGH MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds BIBLE INSTITUTE OF HAWAII ↗
  • Who funds THE POTTER'S INN ↗
  • Who funds Missionary Support Services Inc ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
  • Who funds Lighthouse ↗
  • Who funds The International Foundation ↗
  • Who funds CADENCE INTERNATIONAL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA10.1× affinity6 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Steward Shipping Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Steward Shipping Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Steward Shipping Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Steward Shipping Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $106k of grant expense with no grantee named in the published copy. A private foundation itemizes every grant it makes, so a return carrying none has filed its list as an attachment that the public copy does not include. The figures above are therefore from FY2020, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Steward Shipping’s filings →

    More from the funding graph