Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Steven & Bede Levinson Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$214k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 55% of STEVEN & BEDE LEVINSON FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $34k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $80k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $100k
$5,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$3.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN TECHNION SOCIETY$50,000
COLEL CHABAD$50,000
FRIENDS OF ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES$35,000
GREATER JEWISH MIAMI FEDERATION$25,000
CHABAD OF WEST BOCA RATON SYNAGOGUE INC$10,000
WORLDWIDE FRIENDS FOUNDATION$10,000
THE ROK FAMILY SHUL$6,000
BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION$5,000
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION$5,000
PEDIATRIC CANCER FOUNDATION$5,000
ST ANDREWS SCHOOL$5,000
CHABAD OF DOWNTOWN CORAL GABLES$3,000
HEALTH INFORMATION PROJECT$2,500
JCC CHABAD OF DUBAI$1,800
INTERNATIONAL RETT SYNDROME FOUNDATION$250
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%AVDA (AID TO VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC ABUSE): $5k → 16%KENYA EDUCATION FUND: $500 → 17%HARRISON'S CHILDREN'S CENTER INC: $100 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WI
NY
OH
CT
CA
TN
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.2M · 18 repeat orgs$89k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +58% since the first grant, against +33% for the ones you funded once.

18 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
22

Total granted

$1.2M
$57k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+58%
+33%

Still filing today

56%
41%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $32k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthInternationalArts & CultureHuman ServicesPublic Safety & DisasterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES
    9× · 2017–2025 · $467k · revenue +53%
  • PC
    PINE CREST PREPARATORY SCHOOL INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $11k · revenue +32%
  • HI
    HEALTH INFORMATION PROJECT INC
    4× · 2018–2025 · $7k · revenue +363%

Funded once

  • TC
    TOMAHAWK CHARITABLE SOLUTIONS FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2023 · $12k · revenue +17%
  • FS
    FOUR SOLIDERS CTR IN MEMORY OF JCCH
    one grant, 2018 · $11k
  • TG
    THE GULIVER FUND
    one grant, 2022 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
2
University of Judaism Foundation
3
Hand in Hand American Friends of the Center for Jewish-Arab Education in Isra

To promote partnership and coexistence among jewish and arab citizens of israel by providing support for integrated schools and providing funding for and assisting in program development in connection with israeli nonprofits with similar…

International
4
The Steinhardt Foundation for Jewish Life Inc
Religion
5
Hebrew Academy of Cleveland

The mission of the hebrew academy is to imbue all students with a love of god, torah and eretz yisroel and to prepare them to achieve excellence in torah and general knowledge based on successful cooperation among family, judaic and…

6
Shalom School

Shalom school's mission is to provide each child with an outstanding education in a nurturing environment that is academically excellent, inclusive, innovative, and inspired by jewish values and traditions.

7
The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum

Chartered by a unanimous act of congress, the museum is america's national institution for the documentation, study, interpretation, and education of holocaust history and serves as our country's memorial to the victims of the holocaust.…

Arts & Culture
8
Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary

To prepare students for the rabbinate and to issue the traditional certificate of ordination in connection therewith. the seminary is authorized to confer the degree of master of hebrew literature (m.h.l.), doctor of hebrew literature…

Education
9
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

10
Us Middle East Project Inc

The organization's mission is to engage in non partisan analysis of u.s. foreign policy in the middle east, with special emphasis on the middle east peace process, and to present policymakers in the united states, in the region and in the…

International
11
Better Future for Israel

To strengthen israel's future in these areas: 1)providing new immigrants with assistance in a few key areas: representing them as they navigate government ministries and assisting them with their challenges as new immigrants to israel.…

Philanthropy
12
Fuchs Mizrachi Schools

The mission of fuchs mizrachi school is to educate each child in the orthodox jewish religious zionist tradition, imbued with the love of g-d, torah, people and the land of israel.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Birthright Israel Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Legion Alpha Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyJewish Community FederationsVeteran Support ServicesDomestic Violence Crisis Se…Public University Foundatio…Cancer Support OrganizationsIndependent K-8 SchoolsChristian Missionary Organi…Early Childhood Education C…Animal Rescue and AdoptionCommunity Arts Organizations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%3%<5yr14%10%5–10yr20%17%10–20yr19%28%20–35yr13%17%35–55yr16%24%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%1%<5yr14%4%5–10yr20%2%10–20yr19%36%20–35yr13%38%35–55yr16%19%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/29
the rest of the field
10%
11,858/120,731

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
16/24
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

COLEL CHABAD — $437,000 · OtherCOLEL CHABADJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF HARRISON INC — $132,714 · OtherJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF HARRISON INCTEMPLE BETH AM DAY SCHOOL — $61,035 · OtherTEMPLE BETH AM DAY SCHOOLCHABAD OF DOWNTOWN CORAL GABLES INC — $40,200 · OtherTHE ROK FAMILY SHUL — $35,000 · Other+24 more — $88,030 · Other+24 moreFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES — $467,450 · InternationalFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCESAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC — $50,000 · InternationalAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL INSTI…+2 more — $18,000 · InternationalGREATER MIAMI JEWISH FEDERATION INC — $32,500 · PhilanthropyPINE CREST PREPARATORY SCHOOL INC — $11,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION — $5,000 · EducationTHE WINDWARD SCHOOL — $5,000 · EducationKING SCHOOL INC — $1,500 · EducationHEALTH INFORMATION PROJECT INC — $7,160 · HealthPEDIATRIC CANCER FOUNDATION — $5,000 · HealthCANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITY GREATER NY & CT INC — $2,085 · HealthInternational Rett Syndrome Foundation — $500 · HealthTOMAHAWK CHARITABLE SOLUTIONS FOUNDATION INC — $11,720 · Public Safety & DisasterLEGION ALPHA INC — $2,500 · Public Safety & DisasterTHE JEWISH MUSEUM — $2,840 · Arts & CultureMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART — $2,620 · Arts & Culture+1 more — $180 · Arts & Culture
Other$793,979International$535,450Philanthropy$32,500Education$22,500Health$14,745Public Safety & Disaster$14,220Arts & Culture$5,640

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES — $467,450 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetGREATER MIAMI JEWISH FEDERATION INC — $32,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTOMAHAWK CHARITABLE SOLUTIONS FOUNDATION INC — $11,720 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetPINE CREST PREPARATORY SCHOOL INC — $11,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION — $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHEALTH INFORMATION PROJECT INC — $7,160 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetPEDIATRIC CANCER FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WINDWARD SCHOOL — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JEWISH MUSEUM — $2,840 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART — $2,620 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLEGION ALPHA INC — $2,500 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetCANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITY GREATER NY & CT INC — $2,085 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHARRISON PBA FOUNDATION INC — $2,000 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetKING SCHOOL INC — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDSHIP CIRCLE — $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetKENYA EDUCATION FUND — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Rett Syndrome Foundation — $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVOICES OF HOPE INC — $180 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHARRISON CHILDREN'S CENTER INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES
  • Who funds AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC
  • Who funds GREATER MIAMI JEWISH FEDERATION INC
  • Who funds TOMAHAWK CHARITABLE SOLUTIONS FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds PINE CREST PREPARATORY SCHOOL INC
  • Who funds Worldwide Friends Foundation
  • Who funds BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds HEALTH INFORMATION PROJECT INC
  • Who funds AVDA
  • Who funds PEDIATRIC CANCER FOUNDATION
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE WINDWARD SCHOOL
  • Who funds THE JEWISH MUSEUM
  • Who funds METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART
  • Who funds LEGION ALPHA INC
  • Who funds CANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITY GREATER NY & CT INC
  • Who funds HARRISON PBA FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds KING SCHOOL INC
  • Who funds FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE
  • Who funds CAT ASSISTANCE INC
  • Who funds KENYA EDUCATION FUND

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift FundNY15.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Jewish Communal Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Steven & Bede Levinson Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Pine Crest Preparatory School Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Steven & Bede Levinson Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Steven & Bede Levinson Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph