Skip to content

· Private foundation

Steve Pearson Foundation Inc

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$162k
Granted FY2026still arriving
12
Grants FY2026still arriving
4
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2026.

Animals$250kHuman Services$202kRecreation & Sports$172kReligion$99kHealth$95kInternational$74kYouth Development$20kArts & Culture$15kOther$0
02FY2026 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k5 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $90k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$2.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CRITTENTON CENTER$50,000
SEASONS CENTER FOR BEHAVIORAL HEALT$20,000
MIRACLE LEAGUE OF ARIZONA$20,000
CAMP FOSTER YMCA$20,000
UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST$10,000
PEOPLE FOR PETS$10,000
WORLD VISION$10,000
HOOKER COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$5,000
EMMETT COUNTY ANIMAL SHELTER$5,000
LOVE TAKES ROOT$5,000
HUMANE SOCIETY OF NW IOWA$5,000
SPIRIT LAKE PROTECTIVE ASSOC$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–26, $165k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 88% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Love Takes Root: $5k → 10%CRITTENTON CENTER: $50k → 13%Love Takes Root: $5k → 10%Crittenton Center: $20k → 13%Love Takes Root: $5k → 10%Crittenton Center: $20k → 13%CAMP FOSTER YMCA: $20k → 7%Love Takes Root: $5k → 10%Crittenton Center: $20k → 13%LOVE TAKES ROOT: $5k → 10%Love Takes Root: $5k → 10%Love Takes Root: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$790k · 9 repeat orgs$104k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +52% since the first grant, against +25% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2026, 3 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
10

Total granted

$790k
$64k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+52%
+25%

Still filing today

67%
10%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $40k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
Human ServicesAnimalsRecreation & SportsHealthArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ML
    MIRACLE LEAGUE OF ARIZONA
    7× · 2020–2026 · $172k · revenue +194%
  • TC
    THE CRITTENTON CENTER
    4× · 2023–2026 · $110k · revenue +62%
  • LT
    LOVE TAKES ROOT INC
    7× · 2020–2026 · $35k · revenue +52%

Funded once

  • YC
    Y Camp Foster
    one grant, 2022 · $20k
  • PL
    PEARSON LAKES ART CENTER
    one grant, 2021 · $15k · revenue +9%
  • BM
    Black Mountain United Church of Christ
    one grant, 2024 · $12k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Platte Ranch Forever Home Sanctuary
Animals
2
Des Moines County Humane Society

The des moines county humane society provides shelter and rescue operations for animals in des moines county, secures permanent, loving homes for abandoned, abused, or neglected animals, and teaches responsible pet ownership and compassion…

Animals
3
Stray Paws Rescue

Our organization believes it is our moral responsibility to protect and improve the lives of rescued animals and place them in loving permanent homes in st. louis metro.

Animals
4
Dogwood Animal Shelter Inc

Humane Treatment of all animals and to enhance the Human-Animal bond

Animals
5
Animal Lifeline of Iowa Inc

Animal lifeline is a special needs no kill animal shelter that helps dogs & cats that are abused, seriously ill, handicapped, pregnant & nursing moms, orphan babies that need to be bottle fed & abandoned. we provide vet care, surgery,…

Animals
6
The Spirit of Okoboji

The primary purpose of the corporation is to provide support for charitable and educational causes primarily, but not exclusively, in the state of iowa in the okoboji area.

Environment
7
Nowata City County Library

Provide books and research capabilities to the public

Education
8
Noahs Hope Animal Rescue Inc

Noahs Hope Animal Rescue accepts unwanted and street animals; restores health and then places the animals in homes around the metro Siouxland area.

Animals
9
Iowa Outlaws Inc
—
10
Iowa West Foundation
—
11
Humane Society of North Central Iow

Provide for shelter, food, veterinary services and adoption of small animals. this shelter operates as a no kill shelter in north central iowa.

Animals
12
Lacrescent Animal Rescue Inc

Established in 2005, La Crescent Animal Rescue (LAR) is an all-volunteer, non-profit 501(c) 3 organization dedicated to the protection and welfare of animals in La Crescent, Minnesota. Our rescue shelter depends solely on the support and…

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Camp Foster Young Mens Christian Association Inc; the most unlike its peers is Okoboji Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PEOPLE FOR PETS: $239,200 · AnimalsPEOPLE FOR PETS+1 more: $5,000 · AnimalsYMCA of the Okoboji: $60,000 · OtherYMCA of the OkobojiGateway Church: $46,500 · OtherGateway ChurchUniversity Presbyterian Church: $29,000 · OtherUniversity Presbyterian …Y Camp Foster: $20,000 · OtherY Camp FosterBlack Mountain United Church of Christ: $12,000 · OtherBlack Mountain United Ch…UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST: $10,000 · OtherClay County Community Center: $10,000 · Other+8 more: $14,900 · Other+8 moreMIRACLE LEAGUE OF ARIZONA: $172,000 · Recreation & SportsMIRACLE LEAGUE OF AR…THE CRITTENTON CENTER: $110,000 · Human ServicesTHE CRITTENTON CENT…LOVE TAKES ROOT INC: $35,000 · Human ServicesLOVE TAKES ROOT INCCamp Foster Young Mens Christian Association Inc: $20,000 · Human ServicesCamp Foster Young M…NORTHWEST IOWA MENTAL HEALTH CENTER: $95,000 · HealthNORTHWEST I…WORLD VISION INC: $39,000 · InternationalHOOKER CTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONINC: $15,000 · PhilanthropyPEARSON LAKES ART CENTER: $15,000 · Arts & Culture
Animals$244,200Other$202,400Recreation & Sports$172,000Human Services$165,000Health$95,000International$39,000Philanthropy$15,000Arts & Culture$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPEOPLE FOR PETS: $239,200 over 7y, 14% of budgetMIRACLE LEAGUE OF ARIZONA: $172,000 over 7y, 8.4% of budgetTHE CRITTENTON CENTER: $110,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetNORTHWEST IOWA MENTAL HEALTH CENTER: $95,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetWORLD VISION INC: $39,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetLOVE TAKES ROOT INC: $35,000 over 7y, 2.1% of budgetHOOKER CTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONINC: $15,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetPEARSON LAKES ART CENTER: $15,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetSPIRIT LAKE PROTECTIVE ASSOCIATION: $3,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PEOPLE FOR PETS ↗
  • Who funds MIRACLE LEAGUE OF ARIZONA ↗
  • Who funds THE CRITTENTON CENTER ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWEST IOWA MENTAL HEALTH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds WORLD VISION INC ↗
  • Who funds LOVE TAKES ROOT INC ↗
  • Who funds Camp Foster Young Mens Christian Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds HOOKER CTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONINC ↗
  • Who funds PEARSON LAKES ART CENTER ↗
  • Who funds EMMET COUNTY ANIMAL SHELTER INC ↗
  • Who funds SPIRIT LAKE PROTECTIVE ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN P BRATKOWSKI MEMORIAL FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Fdn of Greater Des Moines F/K/A Greater Des Moines Community FdnIA18.8× affinity7 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Fdn of Greater Des Moines F/K/A Greater Des Moines Community Fdn · Maser Family Foundation · Krause Gentle Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Steve Pearson Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Steve Pearson Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Steve Pearson’s filings →

    More from the funding graph