Skip to content

· Private foundation

Stephenson Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.2M
Granted FY2024still arriving
30
Grants FY2024still arriving
11
States reached
$850k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

71% of Stephenson Foundation’s FY2024 grant dollars went to The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 18 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

18
’20
22
’21
17
’22
15
’23
18
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Education$4.0MPublic Benefit$795kSocial Science$425kEnvironment$329kHealth$312kRecreation & Sports$210kHuman Services$87kYouth Development$85kOther$0
02FY2024 · 30 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k16 grants · $33k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $165k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $200k
  • $250k+1 grant · $850k
$5,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$21M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOOVER INSTITUTION$850,000
FOLDS OF HONOR$100,000
AMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE$50,000
FOLDS OF HONOR$50,000
HARVARD UNIVERSITY$25,000
CURE ALZHEIMER'S FUND$25,000
CAL MATTERS$25,000
LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY (SIEPR)$25,000
KIPP BAY AREA SCHOOLS$15,000
SPIRIT OF AMERICA$10,000
THE DAWN REDWOODS TRUST$10,000
ANTI CORRUPTION FOUNDATION$10,000
POSTPARTUM SUPPORT CENTER$10,000
UCLA CANCER CENTER FOUNDATION$10,000
WILMINGTON FRIENDS SCHOOL$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 34% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CURE ALZHEIMERS FUND: $50k → 7%FRIENDS OF HARVARD FOOTBALL: $30k → 8%ANGEL WINGS NETWORK: $40k → 14%FOLDS OF HONOR: $100k → 15%BENS: $200k → 14%JOSEPHY CENTER FOR ARTS AND CULTURE: $25k → 12%DUCKS UNLIMITED: $25k → 17%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB: $25k → 13%DELTA WATERFOWL: $25k → 10%SPIRIT OF AMERICA: $25k → 7%CURE ALZHEIMER'S FUND: $25k → 7%FRIENDS OF HARVARD BASEBALL: $25k → 8%AFRICAN PARKS FOUNDATION: $50k → 17%TEXAS 2036: $200k → 14%FOLDS OF HONOR: $100k → 15%BENS: $100k → 14%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB: $25k → 13%SAFE PROJECT: $25k → 7%CURE ALZHEIMERS FUND: $25k → 7%HARVARD UNIVERSITY: $25k → 8%AFRICAN PARKS FOUNDATION: $25k → 17%FOLDS OF HONOR: $55k → 15%BENS: $100k → 14%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB: $25k → 13%SPIRIT OF AMERICA - UKRAINE: $25k → 7%FOLDS OF HONOR: $50k → 15%BENS: $100k → 14%FOLDS OF HONOR: $50k → 15%FOLDS OF HONOR: $50k → 15%CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL: $50k → 7%FOLDS OF HONOR: $50k → 15%AMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE: $50k → 14%FOLDS OF HONOR: $50k → 15%AMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE: $50k → 14%CLIMATE LEADERSHIP COUNCIL: $50k → 14%CLIMATE LEADERSHIP COUNCIL: $50k → 14%HOOVER INSTITUTION: $850k → 8%LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $500k → 8%AEI: $50k → 14%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $500k → 8%HOOVER INSTITUTION: $375k → 8%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $250k → 8%HOOVER INSTITUTION: $250k → 8%HOOVER INSTITUTION: $250k → 8%STANFORD UNIVERSITY (SIEPR): $100k → 8%STANFORD UNIVERSITY (SIEPR): $100k → 8%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $100k → 8%LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY (SIEPR): $100k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ID
ND
NY
MA
OR
PA
CA
NE
VA
MD
DE
TN
NC
DC
OK
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 49% of Stephenson Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 61% of the giving stays in CA; by stated purpose, 48%.

Stephenson Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 11% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.8M · 36 repeat orgs$484k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +68% since the first grant, against +41% for those funded once.

36 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2024, 20 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

36
19

Total granted

$2.8M
$448k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+68%
+41%

Still filing today

50%
79%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $37k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationInternationalEnvironmentArts & CultureRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FO
    FOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION
    5× · 2020–2024 · $531k · revenue +103%
  • AD
    ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION
    5× · 2020–2024 · $150k · revenue +147%
  • CL
    CLIMATE LEADERSHIP COUNCIL INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $125k · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • Texas 2036graduated
    one grant, 2020 · $200k · revenue +68%
  • CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue +64%
  • AW
    ANGEL WINGS NETWORK INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $40k · revenue +34%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
2
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
3
The Rand Corporation

Help improve policy and decision making through research and analysis.

Public Benefit
4
National Academy of Public Administration

The National Academy of Public Administration is an independent, 501(c)(3) nonprofit, non partisan Organization established in 1967 and chartered by Congress in 1984. See Schedule O

Public Benefit
5
Observer Research Foundation America

Organization mission the observer research foundation america orf america is an independent, non-partisan, and nonprofit organization in washington dc dedicated to addressing policy challenges facing the united states, india, and their…

International
6
Cna Corporation

Cna is a non-profit research organization that operates the center for naval analyses, a federally funded research center that has supported the navy and marine corps for nearly seventy years, and the institute for public research that…

—
7
American Foreign Service Association

American foreign service association (afsa) is both the principal advocate for the long-term institutional wellbeing of the professional career foreign service and responsible for safeguarding the interest of afsa members. (continued on…

—
8
The International Institute for Strategic Studies - Us

To provide accurate, objective information and analysis on international strategic issues for legislators, diplomats, foreign affairs analysts, international business leaders, economists, the military, defense commentators, journalists,…

International
9
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
10
Partnership for Public Service Inc

Making our government work better is a daunting task, and we are a small organization seeking to transform a government that employs millions of civilians and manages trillions of dollars in taxpayer revenue needed to protect public…

Employment
11
Foreign Policy Research Institute

The foreign policy research institute (frpi) is dedicated to producing the highest quality scholarship and nonpartisan policy analysis focused on crucial foreign policy and national security challenges facing the united states. we educate…

International
12
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Teach for America Inc; the most unlike its peers is Grace Science Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

40 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 40 of the 65 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
40/40
Grantees still filing
28/40
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $3,180,000 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITYFOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION: $530,780 · EducationFOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION+7 more: $208,500 · EducationBENS: $500,000 · OtherBENSSTANFORD UNIVERSITY (SIEPR): $200,000 · OtherSTANFORD UNIVERSITY (SIEPR)LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY (SIEPR): $125,000 · OtherLELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERS…AFRICAN PARKS FOUNDATION: $100,000 · OtherAFRICAN PARKS FOUNDATIONBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB: $85,000 · OtherAEI: $75,000 · OtherCalMatters: $60,000 · Other+31 more: $584,800 · Other+31 moreALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $150,000 · HealthSTOP THE ADDICTION FATALITY EPIDEMIC (SAFE) PROJECT US: $50,000 · HealthFOUNDATION FOR AMERICAN INNOVATION: $40,000 · HealthANGEL WINGS NETWORK INC: $40,000 · HealthPostpartum Support Center: $10,000 · Health+3 more: $2,250 · HealthCLIMATE LEADERSHIP COUNCIL INC: $125,000 · EnvironmentCONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION: $50,000 · EnvironmentDucks Unlimited Inc: $33,500 · EnvironmentTexas 2036: $200,000 · Public BenefitAMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH: $100,000 · Social ScienceSpirit of America Worldwide: $35,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $25,000 · InternationalCOUNCIL OF AMERICAN AMBASSADORS: $13,000 · InternationalAnti-Corruption Foundation Inc: $10,000 · International+1 more: $253 · International
Education$3,919,280Other$1,729,800Health$292,250Environment$208,500Public Benefit$200,000Social Science$100,000International$83,253

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $3,180,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION: $530,780 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetTexas 2036: $200,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $150,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetCLIMATE LEADERSHIP COUNCIL INC: $125,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetAMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH: $100,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetKIPP BAY AREA SCHOOLS: $85,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCalMatters: $60,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetALL STARS HELPING KIDS INC: $57,000 over 5y, 2.0% of budgetBay Area Womens Sports Initiative: $50,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetSTOP THE ADDICTION FATALITY EPIDEMIC (SAFE) PROJECT US: $50,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetCONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR EXCELLENCE IN EDUCATION INC: $50,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR AMERICAN INNOVATION: $40,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetDelta Waterfowl Foundation: $36,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetSpirit of America Worldwide: $35,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetDucks Unlimited Inc: $33,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJosephy Center for Arts and Culture: $25,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetCASTILLEJA SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $13,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCOUNCIL OF AMERICAN AMBASSADORS: $13,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetAtherton Police Officers Assn: $12,100 over 4y, 8.1% of budgetAnti-Corruption Foundation Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetRedwood City Police Activities League Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetRAVENSWOOD EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPostpartum Support Center: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE RONALD REAGAN PRESIDENTIAL FOUNDATION AND INSTITUTE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTeach for America Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FEDERATION OF POLICE AND CONCERNED CITIZENS INC: $3,750 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SPECIAL FORCES CHARITABLE TRUST: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE DAWN REDWOODS CHARITABLE TRUST: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGRACE SCIENCE FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFREE TO CHOOSE NETWORK INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSUTTER BAY MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOCCER WITHOUT BORDERS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNo One Left Behind: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBUSINESS EXECUTIVES FOR NATIONAL SECURITY: $253 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds FOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Texas 2036 ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CLIMATE LEADERSHIP COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH ↗
  • Who funds KIPP BAY AREA SCHOOLS ↗
  • Who funds CalMatters ↗
  • Who funds ALL STARS HELPING KIDS INC ↗
  • Who funds Bay Area Womens Sports Initiative ↗
  • Who funds STOP THE ADDICTION FATALITY EPIDEMIC (SAFE) PROJECT US ↗
  • Who funds CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR EXCELLENCE IN EDUCATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR AMERICAN INNOVATION ↗
  • Who funds ANGEL WINGS NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds Delta Waterfowl Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Spirit of America Worldwide ↗
  • Who funds Ducks Unlimited Inc ↗
  • Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds Josephy Center for Arts and Culture ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Silicon Valley Community FoundationCA23× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Marin Community Foundation · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · The Stanley S Langendorf Foundation · Gordon E and Betty I Moore Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · Greater Houston Community Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Stephenson Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Stephenson Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
  • Josephy Center for Arts and Culture: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Stephenson Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Stephenson Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 65 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Stephenson’s filings →

More from the funding graph