· Private foundation
Stephen & Mary Birch Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k78 grants · $371k
- $10k–50k138 grants · $2.2M
- $50k–250k25 grants · $2.0M
- $250k+3 grants · $1.5M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| WACO FAM PRACTICE FDN | $750,000 |
| AVE PHILOMENA | $500,000 |
| SBCS CORPORATION | $250,000 |
| UC SAN DIEGO BIRCH AQUARIUM | $225,000 |
| KICK START | $200,000 |
| GROSSMONT HOSPITAL FDN | $150,000 |
| CHRISTIAN HEALTH CARE CENTER | $100,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $100,000 |
| RAMAPO COLLEGE FOUNDATION | $100,000 |
| MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER | $100,000 |
| RUTGERS CANCER INSTITUTE OF NJ | $100,000 |
| MCKINLEY PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARY | $75,000 |
| HOUSE OF UKRAINE | $75,000 |
| SAN DIEGO NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM | $65,000 |
| OPERATION WARM | $65,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $1.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 62% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +23% since the first grant, against +9% for the ones you funded once.
179 repeat relationships — 132 still active in FY2024, 47 since wound down; 108 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.0M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- APAVE PHILOMENA INC3× · 2022–2024 · $625k · revenue +72% · 25% of their budget
- SHSharp Healthcare Foundation3× · 2020–2023 · $625k · revenue +34%
- KDKick Drugs Out of America Foundation3× · 2020–2022 · $500k · revenue +5%
Funded once
- TITERI Incgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $500k · revenue +25%
- TSTHE STATION OF THE CROSS RADIOone grant, 2020 · $500k
- CCCOVENANT CHRISTIAN SCHOOLone grant, 2021 · $500k · revenue -11% · 84% of their budget
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Divine canines therapy encourages smiles and brightens lives. to accomplish this, we recruit and train teams of dogs and their owners and organize and facilitate regular, frequent visits to residents of special care facilities.
Hero Dogs improves the quality of life of our nations heroes and enhances the services of community organizations by placing assistance dogs with customized training & lifetime support.
To champion public awareness of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and challenges confronting our countrys heroes and rally support for shelter animal adoption by connecting heroes and companions.
To maximize the innate ability of dogs to give the gift of independence to individuals regardless of disability or age.
Our organization's mission is to raise awareness for and provide physical aid and support to disabled us military veterans. our program covers a crucial gap in the industry-a veteran operated organization, that can assist veterans with…
To train and provide service dogs of the highest quality at no cost to disabled american veterans and others with mobile disabilities in order to help restore their physical and emotional independence.
Operation Freedom Paws empowers veterans and individuals with disabilities to restore their freedom to live life.
To remove the "no pets allowed" sign on the doors of domestic violence shelters. women should not have to choose between leaving their abuser and leaving their pets behind to be abused.
Healing paws for warriors is a local veteran found / veteran led 501(c)(3) that provides rescue to trained service dogs to veterans faced with post traumatic stress disorder (ptsd), traumatic brain injury (tbi) and/or military sexual…
Pets for Vets enriches the lives of veterans by creating a life-changing Super Bond with expertly selected and trained shelter or rescue pets. It provides ongoing expert support to ensure a reciprocal and thriving partnership at no cost to…
In addition to rescue and adoption, pet orphans provides a wide range of services including education, medical/financial, spay/neuter, and training assistance.
Sof is called to empower warriors to find purpose, be resilient, and live well. we develop and provide customized treatment plans for veterans through our national network of partners.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Minuteman Disaster Response Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Czech Catholic Foundation of Texas. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 7% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
269 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 269 of the 516 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds AVE PHILOMENA INC ↗
- Who funds Sharp Healthcare Foundation ↗
- Who funds TERI Inc ↗
- Who funds Kick Drugs Out of America Foundation ↗
- Who funds COVENANT CHRISTIAN SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds RAMAPO COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Mission of Divine Mercy Inc ↗
- Who funds SBCS CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds SAN DIEGO SOCIETY OF NATURAL HISTORY ↗
- Who funds Operation Warm Inc ↗
- Who funds HOUSE OF UKRAINE ↗
- Who funds Burn Institute ↗
- Who funds Cornell University ↗
- Who funds CHULA VISTA FIREFIGHTER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE VALLEY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Christian Health Care Center ↗
- Who funds THE SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds K9S4COPS INC ↗
- Who funds Grossmont Hospital Foundation ↗
- Who funds THE BIOLOGICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds Metropolitan Opera Association Inc ↗
- Who funds PARLANCE CHAMBER CONCERTS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Ken W Davis Foundation · Gil and Dody Weaver Foundation · W P & Bulah Luse Foundation · Strake Foundation · Hattie Mae Lesley Foundation Inc · Walter J & Betty C Zable Foundation · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Coserv Charitable Foundation · The Rees-Jones Foundation · The Cushman Foundation · Thomas M Helen McKee & John P Ryan Fo John P Ryan Foundation Inc · Harry S & Isabel C Cameron Foundation Sentinel Trust Company
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Stephen & Mary Birch Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Family Promise of Southern Delaware Inc — 100% of income from government
- Big Brothers Big Sisters of Delaware Inc — 73% of income from government
- Selah Freedom Inc — 53% of income from government
- The Montclair Art Museum — 11% of income from government
- Ramapo College Foundation — 1% of income from government
- Christian Health Care Center — 0% of income from government
- Casa of Jackson County Inc — 0% of income from government
- Big Dog Ranch Rescue Inc — 0% of income from government
- New Jersey Performing Arts Center Corporation — 0% of income from government
- Children's Dream Fund Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Stephen & Mary Birch Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Stephen & Mary Birch Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.