Skip to content

· Private foundation

Stephen & May C Leeman Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$157k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$14k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Crime & Legal$591kYouth Development$437kEducation$249kHuman Services$237kArts & Culture$176kHealth$136kCivil Rights$2k
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $3k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $154k
$14,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FIVER CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION$14,000
FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN OF NY$14,000
FRESH YOUTH INITIATIVES$14,000
EXALT YOUTH$14,000
CHILDREN OF PROMISE NYC$14,000
LEGAL OUTREACH$14,000
ASSOCIATION TO BENEFIT CHILDREN$14,000
BALLET TECH FOUNDATION$14,000
THE GO PROJECT$14,000
BREAKTHROUGH NEW YORK$14,000
AVENUES FOR JUSTICE$14,000
EQUAL JUSTICE USA$1,603
NORTH EAST COMMUNITY CENTER$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $485k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%RED HOOK INITIATIVE: $1k → 20%ASSOCIATION TO BENEFIT CHILDREN: $140k → 17%ASSOCIATION TO BENEFIT CHILDREN: $15k → 17%ASSOCIATION TO BENEFIT CHILDREN: $15k → 17%ASSOCIATION TO BENEFIT CHILDREN: $15k → 17%ASSOCIATION TO BENEFIT CHILDREN: $15k → 17%ASSOCIATION TO BENEFIT CHILDREN: $15k → 17%ASSOCIATION TO BENEFIT CHILDREN: $14k → 17%FRESH YOUTH INITIATIVES: $90k → 17%FRESH YOUTH INITIATIVES: $90k → 17%FRESH YOUTH INITIATIVES: $16k → 17%FRESH YOUTH INITIATIVES: $15k → 17%FRESH YOUTH INITIATIVES: $15k → 17%FRESH YOUTH INITIATIVES: $15k → 17%FRESH YOUTH INITIATIVES: $14k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.8M · 16 repeat orgs$6k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
8

Total granted

$1.8M
$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
+50%

Still filing today

81%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentEducationCrime & LegalArts & CultureCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FY
    FRESH YOUTH INITIATIVES INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $255k · revenue +43%
  • AT
    ASSOCIATION TO BENEFIT CHILDREN
    7× · 2018–2024 · $229k · revenue +61%
  • BT
    BALLET TECH FOUNDATION INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $176k · revenue +53%

Funded once

  • B
    BROTHERSINC
    one grant, 2022 · $1k
  • RH
    RED HOOK INITIATIVEgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $1k · revenue +50%
  • CF
    CENTER FOR COMMUNITY ALTERNATIVES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $500 · revenue +90%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Advocates for Children of New York

To ensure a high quality education for new york students who face barriers to academic success, focusing on students from low-income backgrounds.

Crime & Legal
2
Friends of the Children- New York

Friends of the children - new york has a mission of impacting generational change by empowering youth who are facing the greatest obstacles through relationships with professional mentors - 12+ years, no matter what. 92% go on to enroll in…

Crime & Legal
3
The New York Opportunity Network Inc Dba the Opportunity Network

The opportunity network ignites the drive, curiosity, and agency of underrepresented students on their paths to and through college and into thriving careers, powered by our commitment to access and community.

Education
4
Families Together in New York State Inc

Establish a unified voice for children and youth with emotional, behavioral, and social challenges. the organizational mission is to ensure that every family has access to needed information, support, and services.

Human Services
5
Futures and Options Inc

Futures and options expands opportunities for students from diverse backgrounds and historically underrepresented communities, collaborating with employers to empower students to gain the skills and confidence needed to succeed in future…

Education
6
Youth Justice Network Inc

Youth Justice Network (YJN)s mission is to break cycles of incarceration and build an equitable justice system by providing young people with individualized advocacy, mentorship, and opportunities to grow, thrive, and lead. (SEE SCHEDULE O)

Human Services
7
Apex for Youth Inc

Apex for youth delivers possibilities to underserved asian and immigrant youth from low-income families in nyc. apex recruits working professionals to volunteer and become positive role models who inspire youth to expand their horizons and…

Community Improvement
8
The Child Center of Ny Inc

The child center of ny strengthens children and families with skills, opportunities, and emotional support to build healthy, successful lives.

—
9
New York State Youth Leadership Council Inc

New York State Youth Leadership Council, Inc. (NYSYLC or the Organization) works to empower immigrant youth through leadership development, grassroots organizing, educational advancement, and self-expression. NYSYLCs goal is to give…

Human Services
10
Children in Conflict Inc

Vision: a world where no child's life is torn apart by war.children in conflict works tirelessly to restore hope, safety and childhoods to children whose lives are affected by war.

Human Services
11
Young New Yorkers Inc

Founded in 2012, young new yorkers' restorative art diversion programs allow young people to exit the criminal legal system, have their cases dismissed and sealed, and avoid a life-long criminal record. in addition, our graduate programs…

Crime & Legal
12
Brooklyn Youth Sports Club Inc

The purpose of the organization is to build an enriching educational setting for under-served brooklyn youth, using athletics as a vehicle to inspire them to fulfill their academic, physical, and personal potential. bkysc is driven by an…

Recreation & Sports
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Citizens Committee for Children of New York Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Children's Health Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/20
Grantees still filing
14/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FRESH YOUTH INITIATIVES INC: $255,000 · Human ServicesFRESH YOUTH INITIATIVES INCASSOCIATION TO BENEFIT CHILDREN: $229,000 · Human ServicesASSOCIATION TO BENEFIT CHILDRE…+2 more: $1,500 · Human ServicesLEGAL OUTREACH INC: $179,900 · OtherLEGAL OUTREACH INCFRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN OF NY: $134,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF THE CHILDR…ATLAS DIY CORPORATION: $20,000 · OtherATLAS DIY CORPORATION+10 more: $14,000 · OtherFIVER CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION INC: $159,000 · Youth DevelopmentFIVER CHILDREN'S F…EXALT YOUTH: $138,300 · Youth DevelopmentEXALT YOUTHAVENUES FOR JUSTICE INC: $139,000 · Crime & LegalAVENUES FOR JUST…CHILDREN OF PROMISE NYC: $130,000 · Crime & LegalCHILDREN OF PROM…THE GO PROJECT INC: $154,000 · EducationTHE GO PROJECT …BREAKTHROUGH NEW YORK INC: $94,000 · EducationBREAKTHROUGH NE…BALLET TECH FOUNDATION INC: $175,600 · Arts & CultureBALLET TEC…EQUAL JUSTICE USA INC: $1,603 · Civil Rights
Human Services$485,500Other$347,900Youth Development$297,300Crime & Legal$269,000Education$248,000Arts & Culture$175,600Civil Rights$1,603

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFRESH YOUTH INITIATIVES INC: $255,000 over 7y, 3.1% of budgetASSOCIATION TO BENEFIT CHILDREN: $229,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetLEGAL OUTREACH INC: $179,900 over 7y, 4.0% of budgetBALLET TECH FOUNDATION INC: $175,600 over 7y, 1.3% of budgetFIVER CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION INC: $159,000 over 7y, 3.7% of budgetTHE GO PROJECT INC: $154,000 over 7y, 3.3% of budgetAVENUES FOR JUSTICE INC: $139,000 over 7y, 2.9% of budgetEXALT YOUTH: $138,300 over 7y, 1.7% of budgetCHILDREN OF PROMISE NYC: $130,000 over 7y, 1.5% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH NEW YORK INC: $94,000 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetATLAS DIY CORPORATION: $20,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetNORTHEAST COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $7,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE USA INC: $1,603 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Children's Health Fund: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRED HOOK INITIATIVE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCITIZENS COMMITTEE FOR CHILDREN OF NEW YORK INC: $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR COMMUNITY ALTERNATIVES INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOUR CHILDREN INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK IMMIGRATION COALITION INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FRESH YOUTH INITIATIVES INC ↗
  • Who funds ASSOCIATION TO BENEFIT CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds LEGAL OUTREACH INC ↗
  • Who funds BALLET TECH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FIVER CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE GO PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds AVENUES FOR JUSTICE INC ↗
  • Who funds EXALT YOUTH ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN OF PROMISE NYC ↗
  • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds ATLAS DIY CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds NORTHEAST COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds EQUAL JUSTICE USA INC ↗
  • Who funds The Children's Health Fund ↗
  • Who funds RED HOOK INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds CITIZENS COMMITTEE FOR CHILDREN OF NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR COMMUNITY ALTERNATIVES INC ↗
  • Who funds HOUR CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds Preparing Leaders of Tomorrow ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK IMMIGRATION COALITION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Pinkerton FoundationNY17.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Pinkerton Foundation · Brooklyn Community Foundation · Robin Hood Foundation · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · The New York Community Trust · Jewish Communal Fund · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Rose M Badgeley Charitable Trust 10-214890 · The Jean & Louis Dreyfus Foundation Inc · The New York Bar Foundation · Credit Suisse Americas Foundation · Mother Cabrini Health Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Stephen & May C Leeman Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Stephen & May C Leeman Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Stephen & May C Leeman Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Stephen & May C Leeman Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Stephen & May C Leeman’s filings →

    More from the funding graph