Skip to content

· Private foundation

Stephen and Mary Graves Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$48k
Granted FY2024still arriving
23
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$64kPhilanthropy$55kYouth Development$47kInternational$42kEducation$41kCommunity Improvement$38kArts & Culture$25kHousing & Shelter$23kOther$0
02FY2024 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,725
Median grant
6
States reached
$74k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOYS REPUBLIC$7,500
ROTARY CLUB OF SEBASTOPOL$6,095
NAMI SONOMA COUNTY$5,060
ROTARY FOUNDATION SANTA ROSA$5,000
EMPIRE LAW SCHOOL$4,884
LUTHER BURBANK CENTER$3,000
ONE ELEUTHERA FOUNDATION$2,700
100 BLACK MEN SONOMA COUNTY$2,500
COMMUNITY BAPTIST CHURCH$2,200
MIRACLE DISTRIBUTION$2,000
ROTARY INTERNATIONAL$1,912
WINDSOR ROTARY FOUNDATION$1,725
Individual grant recipient$675
THE PROMISE CENTER$500
Individual grant recipient$420
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $22k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BOYS REPUBLIC: $8k → 14%BOYS REPUBLIC: $8k → 14%BOYS REPUBLIC: $7k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
MN
IL
MI
NY
OH
PA
CT
CA
CO
MO
VA
AZ
NM
KS
TN
DC
HI
OK
LA
AL
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 11% of Stephen and Mary Graves Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Stephen and Mary Graves Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 3.7% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

60%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$243k · 30 repeat orgs$160k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +11% since the first grant, against +9% for those funded once.

30 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
52

Total granted

$243k
$155k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
+9%

Still filing today

27%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEducationCommunity ImprovementHealthInternationalPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BR
    Boys Republic
    3× · 2022–2024 · $22k · revenue +32%
  • LB
    LUTHER BURBANK MEMORIAL FOUNDATION
    2× · 2022–2023 · $10k · revenue +13%
  • SD
    SANDRA DAY O'CONNOR INSTITUTE FOR AMERICAN DEMOCRACY
    3× · 2017–2023 · $9k · revenue +195%

Funded once

  • FA
    FENCES AT THE TOP INC
    one grant, 2023 · $23k
  • SC
    Sonoma County Library Foundation
    one grant, 2023 · $19k · revenue -76%
  • LF
    LIME FOUNDATIONS
    one grant, 2017 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
2
President-Board of Trustees Santa Clara College

Scu is a catholic and jesuit institution that makes student learning its central focus, promotes faculty and staff learning in its various forms, and exhibits organizational learning.

Education
3
Dominican University of California

Our institutional mission is to educate and prepare students to be ethical leaders and socially responsible global citizens who incorporate the dominican values of study, reflection, community and service into their lives.

Education
4
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
5
California College of the Arts

California college of the arts educates students to shape culture and society through the practice and critical study of art, architecture, design, and writing. benefitting from its san francisco bay area location, the college prepares…

Education
6
Golden Gate University

Golden gate university prepares individuals to lead and serve by providing high quality, practice-based educational programs in law, taxation, business and related professions - as a nonprofit institution - in an innovative and challenging…

Education
7
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
8
University of the Pacific

To provide a superior, student-centered learning experience integrating liberal arts and professional education and preparing individuals for lasting achievement and responsible leadership in their careers and communities.

Education
9
The American Institute of Architects California

The AIA California, in collaboration with local components, is the voice of the architectural profession.

—
10
Sacramento Region Community Foundation

The Sacramento Region Community Foundation leads, serves, and inspires enduring philanthropy for a just and vibrant Sacramento region.

Philanthropy
11
Uc Santa Barbara Foundation

The uc santa barbara foundation actively works to further the goals of the university of california, santa barbara. the foundation seeks to maintain and nurture the university's quality and distinction. on behalf of the campus, the…

Education
12
The Rand Corporation

Help improve policy and decision making through research and analysis.

Public Benefit
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Heritage Foundation; the most unlike its peers is The Promise Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 91 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/35
Grantees still filing
25/35
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FENCES AT THE TOP INC: $23,338 · OtherFENCES AT THE TOP INCBAHAMAS HABITAT: $22,015 · OtherBAHAMAS HABITATROTARY CLUB OF LENEXA KS FDTN: $19,500 · OtherROTARY CLUB OF LENEXA KS FDTNSonoma County Library Foundation: $18,500 · OtherSonoma County Library FoundationLIME FOUNDATIONS: $15,349 · OtherRCRC FOUNDATION: $14,910 · OtherONE ELEUTHERA FOUNDATION: $14,510 · OtherRotary Club of Sebastopol: $13,695 · OtherROTARY FOUNDATION SANTA ROSA: $12,500 · Other+65 more: $167,769 · Other+65 moreGLOBAL OFFSITE CARE: $34,902 · InternationalGLOBAL OFFSITE CA…THE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $31,022 · InternationalTHE ROTARY FOUNDA…Boys Republic: $22,128 · Human ServicesSANDRA DAY O'CONNOR INSTITUTE FOR AMERICAN DEMOCRACY: $8,500 · Community ImprovementWOOSTER ROTARY FOUNDATION: $344 · Community ImprovementUniversity of Illinois Foundation: $5,000 · EducationKANSAS CITY ART INSTITUTE: $2,000 · EducationSTEPHENS COLLEGE: $1,000 · EducationHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $300 · Education+1 more: $198 · EducationCalifornia Womens Recovery Inc: $2,400 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $1,500 · HealthECHO PARK FILM CENTER: $2,000 · Arts & CultureTHE CIRCUS BARN INC: $1,049 · Arts & CultureKQED INC: $180 · Arts & Culture+2 more: $70 · Arts & Culture
Other$322,086International$65,924Human Services$22,128Community Improvement$8,844Education$8,498Health$3,900Arts & Culture$3,299

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGLOBAL OFFSITE CARE: $34,902 over 4y, 56% of budgetTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $31,022 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetBoys Republic: $22,128 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSonoma County Library Foundation: $18,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetRotary Club of Sebastopol: $13,695 over 4y, 5.3% of budgetLUTHER BURBANK MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSANDRA DAY O'CONNOR INSTITUTE FOR AMERICAN DEMOCRACY: $8,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetPHOENIX ROTARY CLUB CHARITIES: $7,853 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetROTARY CLUB OF SANTA ROSA WEST: $7,290 over 2y, 12% of budgetNAMI Sonoma County: $7,160 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetANN ARBOR CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetUniversity of Illinois Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEMMANUEL CHRISTIAN ACADEMY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCalifornia Womens Recovery Inc: $2,400 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetKANSAS CITY ART INSTITUTE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC: $1,900 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CIRCUS BARN INC: $1,049 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHENS COLLEGE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYoung America's Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRotary Club of Rohnert Park-Cotati: $775 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetCatholic Charities San Bernardino & Riverside Counties: $630 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGARY SINISE FOUNDATION: $520 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOOSTER ROTARY FOUNDATION: $344 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDONORSCHOOSEORG: $198 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKQED INC: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIFEWORKS OF SONOMA COUNTY: $125 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PENNSYLVANIA BALLET ASSOCIATION: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMUSEUM OF SONOMA COUNTY: $20 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $17 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GLOBAL OFFSITE CARE ↗
  • Who funds THE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds Boys Republic ↗
  • Who funds Sonoma County Library Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Rotary Club of Sebastopol ↗
  • Who funds LUTHER BURBANK MEMORIAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SANDRA DAY O'CONNOR INSTITUTE FOR AMERICAN DEMOCRACY ↗
  • Who funds PHOENIX ROTARY CLUB CHARITIES ↗
  • Who funds ROTARY CLUB OF SANTA ROSA WEST ↗
  • Who funds NAMI Sonoma County ↗
  • Who funds ANN ARBOR CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING INC ↗
  • Who funds University of Illinois Foundation ↗
  • Who funds EMMANUEL CHRISTIAN ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds California Womens Recovery Inc ↗
  • Who funds KANSAS CITY ART INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds ECHO PARK FILM CENTER ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sonoma County Community FoundationCA19.4× affinity7 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sonoma County Community Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Stephen and Mary Graves Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Stephen and Mary Graves Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Stephen and Mary Graves Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Stephen and Mary Graves Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 91 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Stephen and Mary Graves Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph