Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Stephen and Margaret Gill Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$321k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What you fund
0188% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20172024.

Arts & Culture$397kRecreation & Sports$320kEducation$281kCivil Rights$170kReligion$135kHealth$122kEnvironment$114kInternational$108kHuman Services$70kOther$313k
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $6k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $90k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $225k
$20,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$4.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ROLAND PARK COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$75,000
OLMSTED NETWORK$75,000
SAN FRANCISCO CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC$75,000
SAN FRANCISCO BALLET$20,000
UNITED RELIGIONS INITIATIVE$20,000
ACLU FOUNDATION$20,000
TRINITY CHURCH MENLO PARK$10,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE$10,000
EPISCOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICES$10,000
AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY$5,000
MEMORIAL AMBLULANCE CORPS$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $70k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%Episcopal Community Services: $10k → 10%EPISCOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICES: $10k → 10%Episcopal Community Services: $10k → 10%Episcopal Community Services: $10k → 10%Episcopal Community Services: $10k → 10%Episcopal Community Services: $10k → 10%Episcopal Community Services: $10k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
NY
MA
RI
CA
MD
DC
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 16% of Stephen and Margaret Gill Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Stephen and Margaret Gill Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.9M · 41 repeat orgs$95k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +37% since the first grant, against +33% for the ones you funded once.

41 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 33 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

41
4

Total granted

$1.9M
$9k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+33%

Still filing today

68%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $86k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureHealthEnvironmentInternationalEducationReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SF
    SAN FRANCISCO BALLET ASSOCIATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $356k · revenue +37%
  • AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $170k · revenue +102%
  • UR
    United Religions
    6× · 2017–2024 · $130k · revenue +97%

Funded once

  • EI
    Episcopal Impact Fund FKA Episcopal Charitiesgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue +136%
  • IN
    ISLAND NURSING HOME INC
    one grant, 2023 · $2k · revenue -113%
  • AH
    American Heart Association Incgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $2k · revenue +33%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

2
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
3
Museum of Modern Art

The Museum of Modern Art is a private, non-profit institution chartered by the State of New York Department of Education in 1929 to foster public awareness of modern and contemporary art. (Continued in Schedule O)

Arts & Culture
4
Marine Biological Laboratory

The Marine Biological Laboratory (MBL) is a world-renowned center for biological discovery and training that is notably affiliated with more than 60 Nobel Prize winners. Research is conducted by full-time faculty as well as hundreds of the…

Science & Tech
5
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

6
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
7
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
8
Oceana Inc

To advocate for policy changes by governments and corporations in order to preserve ocean life and return the oceans to their former abundance.

Environment
9
San Diego Museum of Art

To inspire, educate and cultivate curiosity through great works of art.

Arts & Culture
10
California Academy of Sciences

The academy is a renowned scientific and educational institution with a mission to regenerate the natural world through science, learning, and collaboration. based in san francisco's golden gate park, it is home to a world-class aquarium,…

Arts & Culture
11
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
12
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is French Heritage Society Inc and the most unlike its peers is San Francisco Opera Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyLand Conservation Organizat…Classical Music EnsemblesFaith-Based Senior LivingVolunteer Fire DepartmentsFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Christian Missionary Organi…Asian American Advocacy & H…Community Arts OrganizationsPregnancy Support ServicesProfessional Ballet Compani…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 56 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%6%10–20yr16%21%20–35yr13%21%35–55yr16%53%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%0%10–20yr16%12%20–35yr13%26%35–55yr16%62%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/34
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,531

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
33/33
Grantees still filing
23/33
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SAN FRANCISCO BALLET ASSOCIATION — $356,000 · Arts & CultureSAN FRANCISCO BALLET A…SAN FRANCISCO OPERA ASSOCIATION — $15,000 · Arts & CultureASIAN ART MUSEUM FOUNDATION OF SAN FRANCISCO — $14,000 · Arts & Culture+4 more — $12,000 · Arts & CultureOLMSTED NETWORK INC — $320,000 · Recreation & SportsOLMSTED NETWORK I…SAN FRANCISCO CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC — $231,000 · EducationSAN FRANCISCO C…Wellesley College — $50,000 · EducationWellesley Colle…MIT Annual Fund — $50,000 · OtherMIT Annual FundIndividual grant recipient — $40,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTrinity Parish Menlo Park — $36,000 · OtherTrinity Parish Menlo ParkSociety for Science the Public — $27,000 · OtherStonington Opera House — $26,000 · OtherROLAND PARK COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $75,000 · OtherROLAND PARK COMMUNITY FOUNDATION …CAMBRIDGE IN AMERICA — $60,000 · OtherCAMBRIDGE IN AMERICAFRENCH HERITAGE SOCIETY INC — $45,000 · OtherFRENCH HERITAGE SOCIETY INCEpiscopal Community Services — $70,000 · OtherEpiscopal Community ServicesAMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY — $40,000 · OtherAMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY+19 more — $134,500 · Other+19 moreAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC — $170,000 · Civil RightsAMERICAN …United Religions — $130,000 · ReligionEpiscopal Impact Fund FKA Episcopal Charities — $5,000 · ReligionPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC — $60,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE INC — $50,000 · HealthPRIORY IN THE USA OF THE MOST VENERABLE ORDER OF THE HOSP / ST JOHN OF JERUSALEM — $7,500 · Health+3 more — $4,500 · Health
Arts & Culture$397,000Recreation & Sports$320,000Education$281,000Other$603,500Civil Rights$170,000Religion$135,000Health$122,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSAN FRANCISCO BALLET ASSOCIATION — $356,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetOLMSTED NETWORK INC — $320,000 over 5y, 20% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC — $231,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC — $170,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetUnited Religions — $130,000 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetROLAND PARK COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $75,000 over 1y, 19% of budgetEpiscopal Community Services — $70,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCAMBRIDGE IN AMERICA — $60,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC — $60,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE INC — $50,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWellesley College — $50,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFRENCH HERITAGE SOCIETY INC — $45,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetAMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY — $40,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO OPERA ASSOCIATION — $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAsian Law Caucus — $15,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetASIAN ART MUSEUM FOUNDATION OF SAN FRANCISCO — $14,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC — $12,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMaine Coast Heritage Trust — $12,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNatural Resources Council of Maine Inc — $8,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetPRIORY IN THE USA OF THE MOST VENERABLE ORDER OF THE HOSP / ST JOHN OF JERUSALEM — $7,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetISLAND HERITAGE TRUST INC — $5,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetEpiscopal Impact Fund FKA Episcopal Charities — $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetMaine Center for Coastal Fisheries — $4,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO MUSEUM OF MODERN ART — $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetREADY BY 21 MENTORING — $4,000 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetPHILHARMONIA BAROQUE ORCHESTRA & CHORALE — $3,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBAL AIDS INTERFAITH ALLIANCE (GAIA) — $2,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetISLAND NURSING HOME INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE AMERICAN FUND FOR WESTMINSTER ABBEY — $2,000 over 2y, 7.6% of budgetDefenders of Wildlife — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetART IN ACTION — $2,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEMORIAL AMBULANCE CORPS — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO BALLET ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds OLMSTED NETWORK INC
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC
  • Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds United Religions
  • Who funds ROLAND PARK COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds Episcopal Community Services
  • Who funds CAMBRIDGE IN AMERICA
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE INC
  • Who funds Wellesley College
  • Who funds FRENCH HERITAGE SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO OPERA ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds Asian Law Caucus
  • Who funds ASIAN ART MUSEUM FOUNDATION OF SAN FRANCISCO
  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC
  • Who funds Maine Coast Heritage Trust
  • Who funds Natural Resources Council of Maine Inc
  • Who funds PRIORY IN THE USA OF THE MOST VENERABLE ORDER OF THE HOSP / ST JOHN OF JERUSALEM
  • Who funds ISLAND HERITAGE TRUST INC
  • Who funds Episcopal Impact Fund FKA Episcopal Charities
  • Who funds Maine Center for Coastal Fisheries
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO MUSEUM OF MODERN ART
  • Who funds READY BY 21 MENTORING
  • Who funds PHILHARMONIA BAROQUE ORCHESTRA & CHORALE
  • Who funds GLOBAL AIDS INTERFAITH ALLIANCE (GAIA)
  • Who funds ISLAND NURSING HOME INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & SonomaCA16.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · The Bessemer Giving Fund · Maine Community Foundation Inc · The San Francisco Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Raymond F and Judith K McCaskey 2003 Charitable Trust · Hickrill Foundation Inc · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Marin Community Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Jewish Communal Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Stephen and Margaret Gill Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 1%
  • Wellesley College1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph