Skip to content

· Private foundation

Stephen and Jennifer Errico Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$311k
Granted FY2024still arriving
20
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$80k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$2.5MHealth$422kReligion$142kYouth Development$118kRecreation & Sports$105kPhilanthropy$98kArts & Culture$86kScience & Tech$54kOther$0
02FY2024 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k8 grants · $24k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $207k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $80k
$10,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$4.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PRESERVATION FOUNDATION OF PB$80,000
JUPITER MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION$35,000
NICKLAUS CHILDREN'S HEALTH CARE FOU$27,000
BOSTON COLLEGE$25,000
LE MOYNE COLLEGE$25,000
RIVERA BEACH HEALTH INITIATIVE$20,000
COLGATE UNIVERSITY$20,000
LOST TREE FOUNDATION$15,000
LOST TREE CHAPEL$10,000
MARK MESSIER FOUNDATION$10,000
OUR LADY OF MOUNT CARMEL CHURCH$10,000
ST EDWARD CATHOLIC CHURCH$10,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
GEORGE WASHINGTON'S MOUNT VERNON$5,000
FRIENDS OF GEORGICA POND FOUNDATION$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $83k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 88% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%FRIENDS OF GEORGICA POND FOUNDATION: $5k → 7%FRIENDS OF GEORGICA POND FOUNDATION: $5k → 7%OASIS-A HAVEN FOR WOMEN CHILDREN: $500 → 12%MOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM: $40k → 17%MOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM: $33k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
NJ
CT
VA
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.2M · 19 repeat orgs$303k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +31% since the first grant, against +8% for those funded once.

19 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
17

Total granted

$3.2M
$148k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+8%

Still filing today

47%
35%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 50% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $155k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationPhilanthropyArts & CultureHuman ServicesHealthYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CU
    COLGATE UNIVERSITY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.5M · revenue +80%
  • LM
    Le Moyne College
    5× · 2017–2024 · $497k · revenue +23%
  • TV
    THE VALLEY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $173k · revenue +157%

Funded once

  • Southern Methodist Universitygraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $100k · revenue +37%
  • MM
    MARK MESSIER FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2019 · $15k · revenue -53%
  • TB
    TEH BELPOINTE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
2
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
3
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
4
The Mount Sinai Hospital

Mount sinai is committed to the advancement of the art and science of medicine through clinical excellence. the central mission consists of high-quality patient care and teaching conducted in an atmosphere of social concern and scholarly…

Health
5
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
6
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
Stony Brook Orthopedic Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
Mcphs University

Mcphs university prepares students for careers in health care through teaching, scholarship, research, professional service and community engagement.

Education
11
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ramapo College Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Ridgewood Backcourt Club Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/21
Grantees still filing
13/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COLGATE UNIVERSITY: $1,490,326 · EducationCOLGATE UNIVERSITYLe Moyne College: $496,932 · EducationLe Moyne CollegeTRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE: $99,920 · EducationSouthern Methodist University: $99,563 · Education+3 more: $11,500 · EducationCOLGATE UNIVERISTY: $272,208 · OtherCOLGATE UNIVERISTYTHE FIRST TEE OF METROPOLITAN NY: $100,000 · OtherTHE FIRST TEE OF METROP…LOST TREE FOUNDATION: $72,500 · OtherLOST TREE FOUNDATIONMARK MESSIER FOUNDATION: $54,000 · OtherMARK MESSIER FOUNDATIONOUR LADY OF MOUNT CARMEL CHURCH: $50,000 · OtherOUR LADY OF MOUNT CARME…CONVENT OF THE SACRED HEART: $40,000 · OtherCONVENT OF THE SACRED H…NICKLAUS CHILDREN'S HEALTH CARE FOU: $27,000 · Other+19 more: $112,150 · Other+19 moreTHE VALLEY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $173,230 · HealthJupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc: $115,000 · PhilanthropyMARK MESSIER FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 · Philanthropy+2 more: $4,000 · PhilanthropyTHE BOYS' CLUB OF NEW YORK: $115,000 · Youth DevelopmentThe Preservation Foundation of Palm Beach Inc: $80,000 · Arts & CultureTHE MOUNT VERNON LADIES' ASSOCIATION OF THE UNION: $5,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $723 · Arts & CultureMOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $72,500 · Human ServicesFRIENDS OF GEORGICA POND FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · Human Services+1 more: $500 · Human ServicesCATO INSTITUTE: $5,000 · Public Benefit
Education$2,198,241Other$727,858Health$173,230Philanthropy$134,000Youth Development$115,000Arts & Culture$85,723Human Services$83,000Public Benefit$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOLGATE UNIVERSITY: $1,490,326 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetLe Moyne College: $496,932 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetTHE VALLEY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $173,230 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetJupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc: $115,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BOYS' CLUB OF NEW YORK: $115,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE: $99,920 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSouthern Methodist University: $99,563 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Preservation Foundation of Palm Beach Inc: $80,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $72,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMARK MESSIER FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetFRIENDS OF GEORGICA POND FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCATO INSTITUTE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MOUNT VERNON LADIES' ASSOCIATION OF THE UNION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNicklaus Children's Health Care Foundation: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRAMAPO COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSKANEATELES LAKE ASSOCIATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRIDGEWOOD BACKCOURT CLUB INC: $1,000 over 1y, 7.0% of budgetGREENWICH HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $723 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOASIS - A HAVEN FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COLGATE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Le Moyne College ↗
  • Who funds THE VALLEY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Jupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE BOYS' CLUB OF NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Southern Methodist University ↗
  • Who funds The Preservation Foundation of Palm Beach Inc ↗
  • Who funds MOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM INC ↗
  • Who funds MARK MESSIER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF GEORGICA POND FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI ↗
  • Who funds CATO INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds THE MOUNT VERNON LADIES' ASSOCIATION OF THE UNION ↗
  • Who funds Nicklaus Children's Health Care Foundation ↗
  • Who funds RAMAPO COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SKANEATELES LAKE ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds RIDGEWOOD BACKCOURT CLUB INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift FundNY12.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Stephen and Jennifer Errico Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Stephen and Jennifer Errico Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Trustees of Boston College: 3% of income from government
  • Ramapo College Foundation: 1% of income from government
  • Rutgers University Foundation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Stephen and Jennifer Errico’s filings →

More from the funding graph